| Literature DB >> 27146090 |
Wayne A Warner1, Shan N Kuang1, Rina Hernandez1, Melissa C Chong1, Peter J Ewing1, Jen Fleischer1, Jia Meng1, Sheena Chu2, Dawn Terashita3, L'Tanya English3, Wangxue Chen4, H Howard Xu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii have been responsible for an increasing number of nosocomial infections including bacteremia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. In this study, we analyzed 38 isolates of A. baumannii obtained from two hospital outbreaks in Los Angeles County for the molecular epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance determinants.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Antimicrobial susceptibility; Epidemiology; Mechanism of resistance; Nosocomial outbreak
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27146090 PMCID: PMC4857389 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1526-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
A. baumannii isolates, nature of samples (case vs control), their collection dates, sites, source of outbreaks and PFGE type
| Isolate No. | Case/Control | Collection Date | Specimen Source | Outbreak Code | No. of Band Differences | PFGE Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC-201 | Case 1 | 12/19/2007 | BAL | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–202 | Case 1 | 12/14/2007 | Blood | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–203 | Case 2 | 12/29/2007 | Tip | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–204 | Case 2 | 12/30/2007 | ETT | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–205 | Case 3 | 12/8/2007 | Tip | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–206 | Case 3 | 11/29/2007 | Tip | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–207 | Case 3 | 12/8/2007 | BAL | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–208 | Case 4 | 11/20/2007 | BAL | X | 0 | X–A |
| LAC–209 | Case 4 | 12/1/2007 | Blood | X | 1 | X–A1 |
| LAC–210 | Control 1 | 12/23/2007 | Wound | X | 3 | X–A2 |
| LAC–211 | Control 1 | 12/29/2007 | Blood | X | 3 | X–A2 |
| LAC–212 | Case 5 | 12/22/2007 | BAL | X | 3 | X–A3 |
| LAC–213 | Case 5 | 12/30/2007 | BAL | X | 3 | X–A3 |
| LAC–214 | Case 5 | 12/21/2007 | ETT | X | 3 | X–A3 |
| LAC–215 | Case 6 | 12/8/2007 | Urine | X | 3 | X–A3 |
| LAC–216 | Case 6 | 12/20/2007 | Blood | X | 3 | X–A3 |
| LAC–217 | Control 2 | 12/4/2007 | Blood | X | 4 | X–A4 |
| LAC–218 | Control 2 | 11/29/2007 | Resp | X | 4 | X–A4 |
| LAC–219 | Control 3 | 1/4/2008 | Resp | X | 3 | X–A5 |
| LAC–220 | Control 3 | 1/3/2008 | Blood | X | 4 | X–A6 |
| LAC–221 | Control 4 | 10/19/2007 | BAL | X | >7 | X–B |
| LAC–222 | Control 4 | 11/10/2007 | Blood | X | >7 | X–B |
| LAC–223 | Control 5 | 10/29/2007 | BAL | X | >7 | X–B1 |
| LAC–224 | Control 6 | 11/16/2007 | Tip | X | >7 | X–C |
| LAC–225 | Control 6 | 11/22/2007 | Resp | X | >7 | X–C |
| LAC–226 | Control 5 | 10/24/2007 | Wound | X | >7 | X–D |
| LAC–227 | Case 1 | 8/4/2009 | Sputum | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–228 | Case 2 | 8/24/2009 | Sputum, Expectorated | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–229 | Case 3 | 8/31/2009 | Sputum | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–230 | Case 4 | 9/3/2009 | Sputum | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–231 | Environmental | 9/15/2009 | Environmental | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–232 | Environmental | 9/15/2009 | Environmental | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–233 | Environmental | 9/15/2009 | Environmental | Y | 0 | Y–A |
| LAC–234 | Case 5 | 8/6/2009 | Sputum | Y | 1 | Y–A1 |
| LAC–235 | Control 1 | 9/6/2009 | Wound | Y | 1 | Y–A2 |
| LAC–236 | Case 6 | 8/4/2009 | Bronchoscopy | Y | >7 | Y–B |
| LAC–237 | Case 7 | 8/6/2009 | Sputum | Y | >7 | Y–B |
| LAC–238 | Case 8 | 8/3/2009 | Wound | Y | >7 | Y–C |
Abbreviations: BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, ETT endotracheal tube, resp respiratory, tip catheter tip
Fig. 1The dendrogram of PFGE profiles of the 38 A. baumannii isolates and comparison of PFGE types, trilocus multiplex PCR types and MLST sequence types. The dendrogram includes PFGE patterns of 38 isolates and the comparison was performed with the BioNumerics software v5.1 using the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) clustering method and the Dice similarity coefficient with 1.5 % band matching tolerance and 0.5 % optimization. The PFGE types were assigned, first based on the outbreaks (X or Y), then based to the degree of similarity according to guidelines of Tenover and colleagues [27]
MIC ranges, MIC50 and MIC90 values based on outbreak
| Outbreak | Antimicrobial agents | MIC, μg/ml | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| range | MIC50 | MIC90 | ||
| Outbreak X ( | Amikacin | 1–256 | 256 | 256 |
| Gentamicin | 4–256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Tobramycin | 0.5–256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Imipenem | 2–32 | 16 | 32 | |
| Meropenem | 8–64 | 32 | 64 | |
| Piperacillin | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Cefepime | 64–256 | 128 | 256 | |
| Cefotaxime | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ceftazidime | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ceftriaxone | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 64–256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Gatifloxacin | 4–64 | 32 | 64 | |
| Levofloxacin | 16–32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Polymyxin B | 0.25–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | |
| Outbreak Y ( | Amikacin | 256 | 256 | 256 |
| Gentamicin | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Tobramycin | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Imipenem | 1–32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Meropenem | 2–32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Piperacillin | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Cefepime | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Cefotaxime | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ceftazidime | 128–256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ceftriaxone | 256 | 256 | 256 | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 64–128 | 128 | 128 | |
| Gatifloxacin | 8–64 | 16 | 32 | |
| Levofloxacin | 16–64 | 32 | 64 | |
| Polymyxin B | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
GyrA and ParC amino acid substitutions and detection of Class 1 integrons in A. baumannii isolates
| Isolate No. | GyrA amino acid changes | ParC amino acid changes | Class 1 integron |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gly -81 | Ser-83 TCA | Ala-84 | Glu-87 | Ser-80 TCG | Glu-84 | integrase | cassette organization | OXA-23 | OXA-24 | OXA-51 | OXA-58 | IS | IS/OXA-23 PCR | |
| LAC–201 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–202 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–203 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–204 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–205 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–206 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–207 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–208 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–209 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–210 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
| LAC–211 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
| LAC–212 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–213 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–214 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–215 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–216 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–217 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
| LAC–218 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–219 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
| LAC–220 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
| LAC–221 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–222 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | – | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–223 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–224 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | ||
| LAC–225 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | ||
| LAC–226 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–227 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–228 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–229 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–230 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–231 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–232 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–233 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–234 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–235 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| + | – | + | – | + | + |
| LAC–236 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–237 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
| LAC–238 | – | Leu TTA | – | – | Leu TTG | – | + |
| – | – | + | – | + | |
Absence of mutations in gyrA or parC genes is denoted as “–“
Presence or absence of class 1 integrase gene is denoted as “+” or “–”
Empty spaces, no tests were performed