Euan J McCaughey1, Ling Li1, Andrew Georgiou1, Michael Hg Golding2,3, Johanna I Westbrook1. 1. Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Emergency Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to quantify utilisation of imaging for patients presenting to an ED with back pain, their characteristics and dispositions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1132 ED presentations for back pain to an Australian metropolitan ED in 2013 was performed. Patient demographics, rates of radiography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and rates of subsequent admission and ED re-presentation were analysed. RESULTS: Patients aged 26-35 years were the largest group presenting with back pain (19.4% of presentations), with the majority being female (52.3%). Imaging was requested at 29.5% (n = 334) of presentations (radiography n = 297; advanced imaging n = 63). Patients over 70 years had higher imaging rates than younger patients (49.4% vs 25.5%, P < 0.001). Imaging was not associated with attendance during or outside office hours (29.3% vs 31.8%, P = 0.4). Of presentations, 34.1% resulted in admission, with no association between imaging and admission (31.8% vs 36.0%, P = 0.2) or ED re-presentation for back pain in the same year (6.5% vs 9.7%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: This study provides benchmark data on the use of imaging for back pain in an Australian ED, an area which has been largely unexplored. The rate of imaging in the ED was higher than previously reported in a General Practice setting. Consistent with guidelines, patients older than 70 were more than twice as likely to receive imaging compared to younger patients. It was beyond the scope of the current study to determine whether these images were clinically indicated and further research is required to determine if initiatives to reduce imaging in this population are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to quantify utilisation of imaging for patients presenting to an ED with back pain, their characteristics and dispositions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1132 ED presentations for back pain to an Australian metropolitan ED in 2013 was performed. Patient demographics, rates of radiography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and rates of subsequent admission and ED re-presentation were analysed. RESULTS:Patients aged 26-35 years were the largest group presenting with back pain (19.4% of presentations), with the majority being female (52.3%). Imaging was requested at 29.5% (n = 334) of presentations (radiography n = 297; advanced imaging n = 63). Patients over 70 years had higher imaging rates than younger patients (49.4% vs 25.5%, P < 0.001). Imaging was not associated with attendance during or outside office hours (29.3% vs 31.8%, P = 0.4). Of presentations, 34.1% resulted in admission, with no association between imaging and admission (31.8% vs 36.0%, P = 0.2) or ED re-presentation for back pain in the same year (6.5% vs 9.7%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: This study provides benchmark data on the use of imaging for back pain in an Australian ED, an area which has been largely unexplored. The rate of imaging in the ED was higher than previously reported in a General Practice setting. Consistent with guidelines, patients older than 70 were more than twice as likely to receive imaging compared to younger patients. It was beyond the scope of the current study to determine whether these images were clinically indicated and further research is required to determine if initiatives to reduce imaging in this population are warranted.
Authors: C Treanor; S Brogan; Y Burke; A Curley; J Galvin; L McDonagh; C Murnaghan; P Mc Donnell; N O'Reilly; K Ryan; H P French Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Gustavo C Machado; Bethan Richards; Chris Needs; Rachelle Buchbinder; Ian A Harris; Kirsten Howard; Kirsten McCaffery; Laurent Billot; James Edwards; Eileen Rogan; Rochelle Facer; David Lord Cowell; Chris G Maher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jill A Hayden; Rachel Ogilvie; Samuel Alan Stewart; Simon French; Samuel Campbell; Kirk Magee; Patrick Slipp; George Wells; Ian Stiell Journal: Diagn Progn Res Date: 2019-01-14
Authors: Simon R E Davidson; Steven J Kamper; Robin Haskins; Michael O'Flynn; Karen Coss; John Paul Smiles; Amanda Tutty; Jane Linton; Joe Bryant; Maree Buchanan; Christopher M Williams Journal: Aust J Rural Health Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.060
Authors: Sweekriti Sharma; Adrian C Traeger; Gustavo C Machado; Christina Abdel Shaheed; Caitlin Jones; Chris G Maher Journal: Australas Emerg Care Date: 2021-07-08