Literature DB >> 27145987

Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study.

R Heller1, C Purcell2, L Mackay3, L Caird3, S T Cameron1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of women from a remote and rural setting who had a termination of pregnancy (TOP), in relation to any barriers they may have experienced trying to access TOP.
DESIGN: Qualitative interview study.
SETTING: Scottish Highlands and Western Isles. POPULATION: Women who had undergone TOP in the Scottish Highlands National Health Service between October 2014 and May 2015.
METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured, audio-recorded telephone interviews were conducted by a researcher with women who had consented to be interviewed at their initial assessment. Six stages of thematic analysis were followed to explore themes in and across participant accounts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes derived from interview transcripts.
RESULTS: Four themes emerged relating to barriers to access and experience: (1) the impact of travel for TOP, (2) temporal factors unique to this population and how they affected women, (3) the attitude of health professionals, notably general practitioners, as a result of local culture, and (4) stigma surrounding TOP and the expectation that abortion will be traumatising.
CONCLUSION: Women in remote and rural areas experience barriers to accessing TOP. Prompt referrals, more providers of TOP and tackling stigma associated with TOP could make delivery of this service more equitable and improve women's journey through TOP. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women in remote and rural areas of Scotland face multiple barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy.
© 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health service accessibility; induced abortion; qualitative; rural health; travel

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27145987     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Katherine A Guthrie; Marlies Schellekens; James Trussell; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care.

Authors:  Annik Mahalia Sorhaindo; Antonella Francheska Lavelanet
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sarah E Baum; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

Authors:  C Purcell; S Cameron; J Lawton; A Glasier; J Harden
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation.

Authors:  Rosalind McDougall; Bridget Pratt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Jill Barr-Walker; Ruvani T Jayaweera; Ana Maria Ramirez; Caitlin Gerdts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial barriers as moral failings: What rural distance can teach us about women's health and medical mistrust author names and affiliations.

Authors:  Michele Statz; Kaylie Evers
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.