Ming Ann Sim1, Syen Yee Leow2, Ying Hao3, Cheo Lian Yeo4,5. 1. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 2. Department of Paediatric Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. 3. Health Services and Biostatistics Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 4. Department of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 5. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Abstract
AIM: Thermoregulatory stability and monitoring are crucial in neonatal care. However, the current standard of temperature measurement using Axillary Thermometry (AT) poses multiple limitations. Temporal Artery Thermometry (TT) is a promising new method, which thus begs the question: Can TT replace AT in neonates? Previous studies reveal conflicting results, with none involving a Southeast-Asian multi-ethnic neonatal population under different environments. METHODS: A 6-month prospective comparative study involving neonates managed in a tertiary neonatal centre. Subjects were divided into 4 groups based on the required nursing environment: A) Room air B) Phototherapy C) Radiant warmers D) Incubators. Six hundred and sixty-one paired TT and AT temperature readings were obtained, with concurrent FLACC scoring to evaluate the discomfort associated with each thermometry method. RESULTS: TT readings were higher than AT in all groups. The mean temperature difference between both methods (TT-AT) was lowest in Group A (0.10 ± 0.19°C), followed by Groups B (0.50 ± 0.33°C), C (0.97 ± 0.76°C) and D (1.15 ± 0.57°C) respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed good clinical agreement (± 0.5°C) between both methods in Group A (7-0.27,0.47). However, Groups B (-0.14,1.13), C (-0.51,2.45) and D (0.03,2.27) showed poor agreement. Multiple GEE analysis revealed Malay ethnicity to be an additional predictor of decreased TT-AT ( β = -0.13, p = 0.012). Compared to TT, AT was associated with higher discomfort levels (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the good agreement and increased comfort with TT use, our study confirms that TT is comparable to AT for neonates nursed in room air. TT is therefore recommended for the temperature screening and monitoring of neonates nursed on ambient air. Its use in other environments and factors predictive of comparability of both methods requires further study.
AIM: Thermoregulatory stability and monitoring are crucial in neonatal care. However, the current standard of temperature measurement using Axillary Thermometry (AT) poses multiple limitations. Temporal Artery Thermometry (TT) is a promising new method, which thus begs the question: Can TT replace AT in neonates? Previous studies reveal conflicting results, with none involving a Southeast-Asian multi-ethnic neonatal population under different environments. METHODS: A 6-month prospective comparative study involving neonates managed in a tertiary neonatal centre. Subjects were divided into 4 groups based on the required nursing environment: A) Room air B) Phototherapy C) Radiant warmers D) Incubators. Six hundred and sixty-one paired TT and AT temperature readings were obtained, with concurrent FLACC scoring to evaluate the discomfort associated with each thermometry method. RESULTS: TT readings were higher than AT in all groups. The mean temperature difference between both methods (TT-AT) was lowest in Group A (0.10 ± 0.19°C), followed by Groups B (0.50 ± 0.33°C), C (0.97 ± 0.76°C) and D (1.15 ± 0.57°C) respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed good clinical agreement (± 0.5°C) between both methods in Group A (7-0.27,0.47). However, Groups B (-0.14,1.13), C (-0.51,2.45) and D (0.03,2.27) showed poor agreement. Multiple GEE analysis revealed Malay ethnicity to be an additional predictor of decreased TT-AT ( β = -0.13, p = 0.012). Compared to TT, AT was associated with higher discomfort levels (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the good agreement and increased comfort with TT use, our study confirms that TT is comparable to AT for neonates nursed in room air. TT is therefore recommended for the temperature screening and monitoring of neonates nursed on ambient air. Its use in other environments and factors predictive of comparability of both methods requires further study.
Authors: Mashette E Syrkin-Nikolau; Karen J Johnson; Tarah T Colaizy; Ruthann Schrock; Edward F Bell Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 1.862