Martin A Cake1, Melinda A Bell1, Julie C Williams2, Fiona J L Brown3, Marshall Dozier3, Susan M Rhind3, Sarah Baillie4. 1. a College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University , Perth , Australia ; 2. b School of Oral and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK ; 3. c The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK ; 4. d School of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear. AIM: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source. RESULTS: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience. CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear. AIM: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source. RESULTS: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience. CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.
Authors: C Svensson; L Forsberg; U Emanuelson; K K Reyher; A M Bard; S Betnér; C von Brömssen; H Wickström Journal: Animal Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauren A Maggio; Aliki Thomas; H Carrie Chen; John P A Ioannidis; Steven L Kanter; Candace Norton; Nancy H Tannery; Anthony R Artino Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2018-10
Authors: Catarina Svensson; Hans Wickström; Ulf Emanuelson; Alison M Bard; Kristen K Reyher; Lars Forsberg Journal: Vet Rec Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 2.695