Literature DB >> 27144821

Unstable Proximal Femur Fractures Treated With Proximal Femoral Locking Plates: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study of 111 Cases.

Cory A Collinge1, Robert Hymes, Michael Archdeacon, Phillip Streubel, William Obremskey, Timothy Weber, J Tracy Watson, David Lowenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A few small case series have found that proximal femur fractures treated with a proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) have experienced more failures than expected. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of patients with acute, unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates in a large, multicenter patient cohort.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective clinical study.
SETTING: The study included patients from 12 regional trauma centers and tertiary referral hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with unstable proximal femur fractures stabilized with a PFLP and having required clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 12 months after injury. INTERVENTION: Surgical repair of an unstable proximal femur fracture with a PFLP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Treatment failures (failure of fixation, nonunion, and malunion) and need for revision surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients (41.4%) experienced a major treatment failure, including failed fixation with or without nonunion (39), surgical malalignment or malunion (18), deep infection (8), or a combination of these. Thirty-eight (34%) patients underwent secondary surgeries, including 30 for failed fixation, nonunion, or both. Treatment failure was found to occur at a significantly higher rate in patients with major comorbidities, in femurs repaired in varus malalignment, and using specific plate designs.
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal femoral locking plates are associated with a high complication rate, frequently requiring revision or secondary surgeries in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures. Given the high complication rate with PFLPs, careful attention to reduction, use of a PFLP implant, and consideration should be given to alternative implants or fixation techniques when appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27144821     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes.

Authors:  Emrah Kovalak; Cenk Ermutlu; Tolga Atay; Özgür Başal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-15

Review 2.  Management of Subtrochanteric Proximal Femur Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Christopher Jackson; Mina Tanios; Nabil Ebraheim
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-28

Review 3.  Subtrochanteric femur fractures: current review of management.

Authors:  Ian Garrison; Grayson Domingue; M Wesley Honeycutt
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Limited Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhang; Bin Zhang; Qirong Dong; Dawei Ge
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-03-26

5.  High failure rate of proximal femoral locking plates in fixation of trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Shuangjian He; Bin Yan; Jian Zhu; Xiaoyi Huang; Jianning Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.