| Literature DB >> 27144085 |
Diane G Yost1, Philippos Tsourkas1, Penny S Amy1.
Abstract
American Foulbrood Disease (AFB) is an infection of honeybees caused by the bacterium Paenibacillus larvae. One potential remedy involves using biocontrol, such as bacteriophages (phages) to lyse P. larvae. Therefore, bacteriophages specific for P. larvae were isolated to determine their efficacy in lysing P. larvae cells. Samples from soil, beehive materials, cosmetics, and lysogenized P. larvae strains were screened; of 157 total samples, 28 were positive for at least one P. larvae bacteriophage, with a total of 30. Newly isolated bacteriophages were tested for the ability to lyse each of 11 P. larvae strains. Electron microscopy demonstrated that the phage isolates were from the family Siphoviridae. Seven phages with the broadest host ranges were combined into a cocktail for use in experimental treatments of infected bee larvae; both prophylactic and post-infection treatments were conducted. Results indicated that although both pre- and post-treatments were effective, prophylactic administration of the phages increased the survival of larvae more than post-treatment experiments. These preliminary experiments demonstrate the likelihood that phage therapy could be an effective method to control AFB.Entities:
Keywords: Paenibacillus larvae; bacteriophages; environmental sampling; genomes; phage therapy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27144085 PMCID: PMC4836486 DOI: 10.1080/21597081.2015.1122698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bacteriophage ISSN: 2159-7073
Sources and designations of phage isolates.
| Category | Source | Phage Designations |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmetics | Hand cream (with beeswax and honey) | Scottie |
| Body wash (with royal jelly) | Beta | |
| Lipbalm #1 | Valery | |
| Lipbalm #2 | Vadim | |
| Lipbalm #3 | Vegas | |
| Hive Samples | Scale from infected hive | Xenia |
| Hive sample from Iowa | Iowa | |
| Hive sample from Iowa (honey and wax) | Ivy | |
| Propilis – Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Halcyone | |
| Propilis – Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Holly | |
| Propilis – Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Heidi | |
| Propilis – Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Harvey | |
| Soil Under Hives | Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Harrison |
| Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Hermione | |
| Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Hayley | |
| Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Hope | |
| Gilcrease Orchards, Nevada | Heath | |
| Pennsylvania | Penny | |
| Pennsylvania | Charlie | |
| Pennsylvania | Paisley | |
| UNLV, Nevada | Tristan | |
| Washington | Willow | |
| Other | Garden soil, Summerlin, Las Vegas, Nevada | Summerlin |
| Garden soil, Summerlin, Las Vegas, Nevada | Sunny | |
| Lysogenic Phages | Phage from ATCC-49843 | Alexis |
| Phage from ATCC-25368 | Bella | |
| Phage from ATCC-25367 | Carly | |
| Phage from ATCC-25747 | Diane | |
| Phage from ATCC-49843 | Erin | |
| Phage from wild strain 2231 | Fern |
Plaque and phage morphologies of the 7 cocktail phages.
| Plaque Morphology | EM Imaging Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Phage Designation | Size | Clarity | Head Shape |
| Xenia | Large | Clear | No data |
| Halcyone | Pinpoint | Turbid | Prolate |
| Willow | Medium | Clear | Prolate |
| Fern | Large | Clear | Prolate |
| Vadim | Large | Clear | Icosahedral |
| Harrison | Medium | Clear | Icosahedral |
| Hayley | Medium | Clear | Prolate |
Plaque diameters were described classified as follows: pinpoint (<0.1 mm), small (0.1 mm – 0.5 mm), medium (0.5 mm – 1.0 mm), and large (>1.0 mm).
= plaques with a turbid halo around a clear plaque center. TEM images were provided by the CAMCOR facilities at the University of Oregon. Measurements are based on the averages of 2–4 images. Family classifications are based on descriptions of morphology only (Ackermann, 1987).
Figure 1.Host range of isolated P. larvae bacteriophages determined by soft agar overlay spot tests. Results range from no lysis (blank cell) to complete lysis (black cell). The bacterial species are represented across the top and are ranked from left to right in order of susceptibility to lysis. The isolated phages are listed on the left side of the table and are ranked from top to bottom in order of the percentage of P. larvae strains they are capable of lysing.
Figure 2.Representative TEM images of 2 phage isolates. The left image displays a phage isolated from a propolis sample with a prolate head and the right image displays a phage isolated from a cosmetic source with an icosahedral head. Scale bar = 100 nm.
Figure 3.Larvae survival rates of media controls. Survival of larvae treated with a negative control (food only) and with the addition of broth (200 µl per 1.0 ml food). Larvae were harvested on Day 0 and fed daily according to Table 3. Negative control data represents 10 control replicates with n = 12 or 13 each. Error bars = standard error.
Daily doses of food, number of spores, and number of phages fed to larvae.
| Days after Grafting | Day 0 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume of Larvae Food (µl) | 10 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 0 |
| # ATCC 49843 Spores | 100 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 500 | 600 | 0 |
| # NRLL B-3554 Spores | 90 | 90 | 180 | 270 | 360 | 450 | 450 | 540 | 0 |
| # Isolated 2188 Spores | 90 | 90 | 180 | 270 | 360 | 450 | 450 | 540 | 0 |
| # of PFUs in Phage cocktail | 3.003 | 3.003 | 6.003 | 9.003 | 1.204 | 1.504 | 1.504 | 1.804 | 0 |
Figure 4.Larvae survival rates with spore infections. Survival rates after infection with P. larvae spores from strains ATCC 49843, NRRL B-3554, and newly isolated 2188. Spores were fed to as indicated (Table 3). Two different treatments with 2188 were conducted: spores given daily or in one dose on Day 0. Negative control data represents 10 control replicates with n = 12 or 13 each. Error bars = standard error.