Literature DB >> 27738559

Comparative genomics of 9 novel Paenibacillus larvae bacteriophages.

Casey Stamereilers1, Lucy LeBlanc2, Diane Yost1, Penny S Amy1, Philippos K Tsourkas1.   

Abstract

American Foulbrood Disease, caused by the bacterium Paenibacillus larvae, is one of the most destructive diseases of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Our group recently published the sequences of 9 new phages with the ability to infect and lyse P. larvae. Here, we characterize the genomes of these P. larvae phages, compare them to each other and to other sequenced P. larvae phages, and putatively identify protein function. The phage genomes are 38-45 kb in size and contain 68-86 genes, most of which appear to be unique to P. larvae phages. We classify P. larvae phages into 2 main clusters and one singleton based on nucleotide sequence identity. Three of the new phages show sequence similarity to other sequenced P. larvae phages, while the remaining 6 do not. We identified functions for roughly half of the P. larvae phage proteins, including structural, assembly, host lysis, DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory, and host-related functions. Structural and assembly proteins are highly conserved among our phages and are located at the start of the genome. DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory, and host-related proteins are located in the middle and end of the genome, and are not conserved, with many of these genes found in some of our phages but not others. All nine phages code for a conserved N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. Comparative analysis showed the phages use the "cohesive ends with 3' overhang" DNA packaging strategy. This work is the first in-depth study of P. larvae phage genomics, and serves as a marker for future work in this area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Foulbrood; DNA packaging strategy; N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase; Paenibacillus larvae; Phamerator; bacteriophage; comparative genomics; comparative proteomics; endolysin; large terminase; siphoviridae

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738559      PMCID: PMC5056774          DOI: 10.1080/21597081.2016.1220349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bacteriophage        ISSN: 2159-7073


Introduction

Paenibacillus larvae is a Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium that is the causative agent of American Foulbrood Disease (AFB), one of the leading causes of the global population decline of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). As its name implies, P. larvae only infect the larva of the honeybee, adult bees being immune. Infection typically occurs when food contaminated with P. larvae spores is fed to a honeybee larva by nurse bees. The spores germinate and proliferate in the larval mid-gut within hours of ingestion, resulting in the death of the larva. The dead larvae turn into a viscous, brownish liquid that then dries to form a hard scale. AFB scales contain millions of highly infectious spores that are then inadvertently spread throughout the hive by other bees as they remove dead larvae from the hive. P. larvae spores are extremely durable, lasting several decades, and are largely antibiotic resistant, making treatment of P. larvae outbreaks difficult. Currently the only method for eliminating P. larvae outbreaks is the wholesale incineration of infected hives. Antibiotics such as oxytetracycline have been used extensively in the past to control AFB, however there now exist antibiotic-resistant P. larvae strains, and furthermore many countries ban the use of antibiotics on honeybees. As bees lack an adaptive immune system, one potential antibiotic-free AFB treatment is the use of bacteriophages that target P. larvae. Phages have several attractive features as a treatment strategy, such as not harming important symbiotic bacteria in the larval gut. The first P. larvae phages were identified from the 1950s through the 1990s, but these were not sequenced as rapid and cost-effective genome sequencing was not available at the time. With the advent of next-generation sequencing and the rise in antibiotic resistant P. larvae strains, there is growing interest in P. larvae phages as a potential treatment for AFB. In the last year alone 5 studies were published on treating AFB with P. larvae phages or P. larvae phage endolysins, with promising, if not conclusive, results. Since 2013, several bacteriophages that infect P. larvae were purified, sequenced, and characterized. Phage phiIBB_Pl23, isolated in Portugal in 2013, was the first to be sequenced and characterized, followed in 2015 by phages Diva, Lily, Rani, Redbud, Shelly and Sitara, isolated in North Carolina, and phage HB10c2 in Germany. Our group recently sequenced and published the genomes of 9 P. larvae phages. In this work, we characterize the genomes of these 9 new P. larvae phages and compare them to the genomes of other currently sequenced P. larvae phages. We putatively identify protein function and characterize the degree to which P. larvae phage proteins are conserved, with a focus on 2 phage proteins in particular: the large terminase and the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase endolysin.

Results

Phage sources, geographical origin, and morphology

The source and geographic origins of the 9 new phages are listed in Table 1. While 2 phages (Diane, Fern) were obtained from lysogens, all 9 phages lyse P. larvae in laboratory conditions (especially P. larvae genotype ERIC I) without needing to be induced, while leaving other Paenibacillus species unharmed. Electron micrographs of phages Diane (Fig 1A), Fern (Fig 1B) and Hayley (Fig 1C) are shown in Fig. 1. All of our phages are Siphoviridae, as are all currently known P. larvae phages. Capsids are prolate, approximately 100 nm long by 50 nm wide, and tails are approximately 150–200 nm long (Fig. 1).
Table 1.

Geographical origin and isolation source of P. larvae phages.

Phage nameGeographical locationIsolation Source
DianeaOHInfected larva, ATCC culture 25747
FernbUSDA lab Germantown MDInfected larva, P. larvae wild strain 2231
HarrisonGilcrease Orchards, N. Las Vegas, NVSoil
HayleyGilcrease Orchards, N. Las Vegas, NVSoil
PaisleyPASoil
VadimcNVLip balm
VegascNVLip balm
WillowNear Bremerton, WASoil
XeniaUSDA lab Germantown MDInfected larva

Lysogenic phage from ATCC culture 25747 isolated in Ohio by White from an infected insect

Lysogenic phage from P. larvae wild strain 2231 isolated from an infected larva scale

Isolated from commercial products purchased in NV

Figure 1.

Scanning electron micrographs of phages (A) Diane, (B) Fern, and (C) Hayley.

Scanning electron micrographs of phages (A) Diane, (B) Fern, and (C) Hayley. Geographical origin and isolation source of P. larvae phages. Lysogenic phage from ATCC culture 25747 isolated in Ohio by White from an infected insect Lysogenic phage from P. larvae wild strain 2231 isolated from an infected larva scale Isolated from commercial products purchased in NV

Phage genome sequencing and assembly

The GenBank accession numbers and results of the genome assembly process for the 9 phages are shown in Table 2. Genome size ranges from 38 to 45 kb, and GC content from 40% to 43%. The genomes are 93–95% coding. No tRNAs were identified. The assembly process for Fern, Harrison, Paisley, Willow and Xenia produced complete genomes (hence min. coverage depth >1 ). For Diane, Hayley, Vadim and Vegas, the assembly process missed the genome ends (hence min. coverage depth = 1), and the genome ends were obtained by PCR as described in ref 26.
Table 2.

Accession numbers and genome assembly results of our P. larvae phages.

Phage nameGenBank accession numberGenome lengthAv. coverage depthMin. coverage depthGC contentPercent coding
DianeKT36165745,65367143.795.7
FernKT36164937,9955029841.993.7
HarrisonKT36165144,2472916140.293.6
HayleyKT36165544,25643143.595.4
PaisleyKT36165344,1723505840.093.5
VadimKT36165645,65394143.795.7
VegasKT36165445,653128143.795.7
WillowKT36165037,9941225041.993.7
XeniaKT36165241,1491234141.593.2
Accession numbers and genome assembly results of our P. larvae phages.

Genome annotation and comparative genomics of P. larvae phages

Genome annotation results are shown in Table 3. The genome annotation process identified between 68 and 86 protein coding genes in each phage. The number of genes increases linearly with genome size (R2=0.99). Approximately 90–95% of the P. larvae phage genes have a statistically significant BLASTP or CD-Search match (E-value<1E-3), while approximately half have a statistically significant BLASTP or CD-Search match to a protein with known function. Comparative genomics using our Phamerator database revealed that the majority (∼75%) of the genes are found only in P. larvae phages, with the majority of the remainder mostly shared with other Bacillus phages. Xenia has 9 genes not found in any other phages, while Harrison and Paisley each have one gene unique to them. Quantitative metrics of our phages genomes such as the length and number of non-coding gaps and overlaps are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Table 3.

Comparative genomics of our P. larvae phages.

Phage nameNo. of genesNo. of genes with BLAST E-value <0.001No. of genes with putative functionGenes found in non-P. larvae phagesGenes found only in P. larvae phagesGene unique to this phage
Diane86834522640
Fern68653618500
Harrison84753823601
Hayley84814321630
Paisley84753823601
Vadim86834522640
Vegas86834522640
Willow68653618500
Xenia77724320489
Comparative genomics of our P. larvae phages. Dotplots of the phages' genomes are shown in Fig. 2. All phages have a conserved region located at the start of the genome. Diane, Vadim, Vegas, and Hayley all appear to be highly similar to each other. Hayley appears to be missing a region located approximately in the middle of the genome that is present in Diane, Vadim, and Vegas. Paisley and Harrison are also very similar to each other, and Fern and Willow to each other. Xenia does not appear to be highly similar to any other phage, but seems closest to Fern and Willow.
Figure 2.

Dotplot of the genomes for 9 new P. larvae phages. A black dot is placed where there is nucleotide identity between 2 phages.

Dotplot of the genomes for 9 new P. larvae phages. A black dot is placed where there is nucleotide identity between 2 phages. To quantify the degree of nucleotide sequence identity between our phages, we constructed a nucleotide sequence identity matrix using ClustalW, shown in Fig. 3. In this figure, we also included all other currently published P. larvae phages (Diva, Lily, Rani, Redbud, Shelly, Sitara, HB10c2 and phiIBB_Pl23). P. larvae phages fall into two similarity clusters containing phages with >60 % nucleotide sequence identity. Phage Lily is very divergent from all other P. larvae phages and does not fall into either cluster. Cluster A and Cluster B phages have a low degree of nucleotide sequence identity with each other (∼40%, which is roughly the percentage nucleotide sequence identity produced by ClustalW for 2 randomly generated nucleotide sequences of equal length). The clusters can be broken down into subclusters containing phages with >90 % nucleotide sequence identity, with Cluster B containing several singletons. All of these groupings cross geographical and source boundaries, e.g. Xenia (isolated in MD) has a very high degree of nucleotide sequence identity (99.5%) with Shelly (isolated in NC). Phages within the same subcluster have similar, though not identical lytic profiles and plaque morphologies. For this reason, we considered Diane, Vadim and Vegas (>99.9% nucleotide sequence identity) and Fern and Willow (99.99% nucleotide sequence identity) to be distinct from each other. However, as the annotation process did not produce any differences between Diane, Vadim and Vegas, we treat these phages as one in subsequent genomic analyses, and do likewise for Fern and Willow. In contrast, annotations of Xenia and Shelly are not identical despite the 99.5% nucleotide sequence identity between these two phages, as Shelly was annotated by another group.
Figure 3.

Percent nucleotide sequence identity matrix for all 17 sequenced P. larvae phages. Phages are classified into clusters and subclusters based on nucleotide sequence identity.

Percent nucleotide sequence identity matrix for all 17 sequenced P. larvae phages. Phages are classified into clusters and subclusters based on nucleotide sequence identity. Genome maps produced with Phamerator are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The difference between Diane/Vadim/Vegas and Hayley is due to 2 genes absent in Hayley (gp30 and gp31), but otherwise all 4 of these phages contain the same genes. Similarly, the difference between Harrison and Paisley is due to a single gene (gp65). Up to gp21 the majority of genes appear to be fully conserved in all phage genomes, with the exception of gp5 and gp8–15, which differ between Cluster A phages and Fern/Willow and Xenia. Of these, gp5, gp8, gp14 and gp15 are single pham genes and are thus still somewhat conserved across all phages, however gp9–13 are not. Past gp21 the genomes diverge, the sole exception being Xenia and Fern/Willow, which have several genes in the same pham throughout the genome, especially in the region between gp42 and gp52 in Fern/Willow (gp51 and gp61 in Xenia). Gp53 and gp54 in Harrison and Paisley are very similar to gp40 and gp41 in Fern/Willow, even though they occur in a non-conserved region in the genomes' mid-section, possibly indicating horizontal gene transfer. The same is true of the last gene in the genome of all the phages.
Figure 4.

Genome maps of our phages obtained from Phamerator (first half). Boxes represent genes, with boxes of the same color indicating genes in the same pham. Genes in a pham of their own are uncolored. Shaded areas indicate regions of high nucleotide sequence similarity between phages, with purple indicating the highest degree of similarity, and red the lowest.

Figure 5.

Genome maps of our P. larvae phages obtained from Phamerator (second half). Boxes represent genes, with boxes of the same color indicating genes in the same pham. Genes in a pham of their own are uncolored. Shaded areas indicate regions of high nucleotide sequence similarity between phages, with purple indicating the highest degree of similarity, and red the lowest.

Genome maps of our phages obtained from Phamerator (first half). Boxes represent genes, with boxes of the same color indicating genes in the same pham. Genes in a pham of their own are uncolored. Shaded areas indicate regions of high nucleotide sequence similarity between phages, with purple indicating the highest degree of similarity, and red the lowest. Genome maps of our P. larvae phages obtained from Phamerator (second half). Boxes represent genes, with boxes of the same color indicating genes in the same pham. Genes in a pham of their own are uncolored. Shaded areas indicate regions of high nucleotide sequence similarity between phages, with purple indicating the highest degree of similarity, and red the lowest. Multiple alignment and percent amino acid sequence identity matrix of P. larvae phage large terminases. With the exception of Lily, all P. larvae phages have a large terminase that is either identical to that of Diane (Diane, Hayley, Vadim, Vegas, Harrison, Paisley), or Xenia (Xenia, Fern, Willow, Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly, Sitara, HB10c2, phiIBB_Pl23). Multiple alignment and average amino acid identity matrix of P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases. There are 5 distinct P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases, with phages in the same group having an identical N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. Group 1 consists of phages Diane, Vadim, Vegas and Hayley, Group 2 consists of phages Harrison, Paisley and phiIBB_Pl23, Group 3 consists of phages Willow and Fern, Group 4 consists of phages Xenia, Shelly, Diva, and Sitara, and Group 5 consists of phages HB10c2, Rani, and Redbud.

P. larvae phage protein functions

Gene products that have at least one statistically significant (E-value <1E-3) BLAST or CD-Search match with a protein of known function are shown in Table 4. The list of all the gene products of our 9 P. larvae phages, the phams to which they belong, and any other phage gene products in those phams are included as Supplementary Table 2.
Table 4.

P. larvae phage genes with statistically significant BLAST and/or CDD matches (E-value < 1E-3) to proteins with known function. The gene product number is shown in the first row of each cell, and the pham number is shown in the second row, italicized in parentheses. Rows are colored according to protein function. We classify phage proteins into 6 functional categories: 1) virion particle (blue), 2) virion assembly (burgundy), 3) host lysis (purple), 4) DNA replication/metabolism (tan), 5) gene regulation, including putative transcription factors (green), and 6) host-related functions (yellow). Gene products whose function cannot be classified into these 6 categories due to lack of sufficient information or conflicting information are left uncolored. Instances where there are 2 or more unrelated functions with statistically significant matches are marked with a footnote, with the more statistically significant (or with higher bit score) function listed in the table, and the less statistically significant (or with lower bitscore) function listed in the footnotes at the end of the table.

 Diane/Vadim/VegasHayleyHarrisonPaisleyFern/WillowXenia
Small terminasegp1 (16596)gp1 (16596)gp1 (16596)gp1 (16596)gp1 (16596)gp1 (16596)
Large terminasegp2 (16567)gp2 (16567)gp2 (16567)gp2 (16567)gp2 (16567)gp2 (16567)
Portal proteingp3 (16597)gp3 (16597)gp3 (16597)gp3 (16597)gp3 (16597)gp3 (16597)
Clp protease ClpPgp4 (16598)gp4 (16598)gp4 (16598)gp4 (16598)gp4 (16598)gp4 (16598)
Major capsid proteingp5 (16599)gp5 (16599)gp5 (16599)gp5 (16599)gp5 (16599)gp5 (16599)
Head-tail connector proteingp7a(16601)gp7a(16601)gp7a(16601)gp7a(16601)gp7a(16601)gp7a(16601)
Head-tail adaptor proteingp8b(16602)gp8b(16602)gp8b(16602)gp8b(16602)gp8b(16602)gp8b(16602)
Head-tail joining proteingp9 (16865)gp9 (16865)gp9 (16865)gp9 (16865)  
Prohead proteasegp10 (16866)gp10 (16866)gp10 (16866)gp10 (16866)  
Tail protein    gp10 (16604)gp10 (16604)
Major tail proteingp11 (16867)gp11 (16867)gp11 (16867)gp11 (16867)gp11 (16605)gp11 (16605)
Tail tape measure proteingp14 (16578)gp14 (16578)gp14 (16578)gp14 (16578)gp14 (16578)gp14 (16578)
Tail proteingp15 (16608)gp15 (16608)gp15 (16608)gp15 (16608)gp15 (16608)gp15 (16608)
Endopeptidase tail proteingp16c(16609)gp16c(16609)gp16c(16609)gp16c(16609)gp16c(16609)gp16c (16609)
Tail proteingp17 (16610)gp17 (16610)gp17 (16610)gp17 (16610)gp17 (16610)gp17 (16610)
Bacteriocin biosynthesis proteingp20d(16613)gp20d(16613)gp20d(16613)gp20d(16613)gp20d(16613)gp20d(16613)
N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidasegp21 (16614)gp21 (16614)gp21 (16614)gp21 (16614)gp21 (16614)gp21 (16614)
Acetyltransferasegp22e(16870)gp22e(16870)    
Transposasegp23f(16615)gp23f(16615)gp23f(16615)gp23f(16615)gp22f(16615)gp22f(16615)
ABC-like transporter protein  gp25 (19147)gp25 (19147)  
Amidase domain protein     gp26g(16618)
Transposasegp30 (16876)    gp29h(16621)
Transposase     gp31 (16622)
Toxin-like protein    gp26 (18320) 
YolD-like protein    gp28 (16625)gp35 (16625)
Toxin  gp30 (19152)gp30 (19152)  
Ankyrin-repeat containing proteingp31i(16877)     
Arc-like DNA binding proteingp32 (16878)gp30 (16878)    
Transposase     gp36h(690)
Transposase     gp37h(16626)
Transposase     gp38 (16627)
Stress proteingp35 (16880)gp33 (16880)    
Integrasegp38 (16588)gp36 (16588)  gp32 (16588) 
Toxingp39 (16723)gp37 (16723)    
Transcriptional regulator  gp35 (19155)gp35 (19155)  
Telomeric repeat binding factor 2  gp37 (19014)gp37 (19014)  
Accessory gene regulator B  gp39 (16970)gp39 (16970)  
Dipeptidyl aminopeptidase/ acylaminoacyl-peptidase  gp41 (19158)gp41 (19158)  
Serine recombinase  gp44j(19161)gp44j(19161)  
Helix-turn-helix domain XRE family transcriptional regulatorgp40 (16883)gp38 (16883)    
Helix-turn-helix domain XRE family transcriptional regulatorgp41 (16884)gp39 (16884)gp45 (19162)gp45 (19162)gp33k(17376) 
Helix-turn-helix Cro/C1 family transcriptional regulator    gp34 (18325) 
Helix-turn-helix domain transcriptional regulator    gp35l(18326) 
Helix-turn-helix domain XRE family transcriptional regulator  gp46 (19163)gp46 (19163)  
Rha-like antirepressor     gp41 (16810)
Transcriptional regulator     gp42m(696)
Helix-turn-helix domain XRE family transcriptional regulator     gp43n(16628)
Helix-turn-helix domain XRE family transcriptional regulator     gp44 (16629)
Restriction endonucleasegp43 (16885)gp41 (16885)    
DNA binding antirepressorgp45o(16631)gp43o(16631)  gp37o(16631)gp47o(16631)
Excisionasegp46 (16887)gp44 (16887)    
Antirepressor  gp53 (16689)gp53 (16689)gp41 (16689)gp51 (16689)
AAA domain ATPase    gp45 (16634)gp55 (16634)
DNA recombinational protein RecT    gp47 (16636)gp57 (16636)
Metallo-hydrolase    gp48 (16637)gp58 (16637)
Primosome component-like protein    gp50 (16639)gp60 (16639)
Replicative DNA helicase    gp51 (16640)gp61 (16640)
yopX family protein    gp55 (16645) 
DNA methylasegp61 (16902)gp59 (16902)    
Single-stranded DNA binding protein, ERF superfamily  gp61 (19169)gp61 (19169)  
Single-stranded DNA binding protein  gp62 (16720)gp62 (16729)  
AbrB family transcriptional regulatorgp64 (16905)gp62 (16905)    
Replication terminator proteingp65 (16906)gp63 (16906)    
Primosome, DnaD subunit  gp65 (16529)   
DNA damage-inducible protein DnaD   gp65 (15038)  
DNA replication protein  gp66p(16552)gp66p(16552)  
Chromosome segregation protein SMCgp67q(16908)gp65q(16908)    
AAA domain ATPasegp68r(16909)gp66r(16909)    
DEAD/DEAH box helicasegp70 (16911)gp68 (16911)    
ABC-type transport system, ATP binding proteingp71 (16912)gp69 (16912)    
DNA primasegp72s(16913)gp70s(16913)    
Endodeoxyribonuclease RusA  gp69 (19173)gp69 (19173)  
Crossover junction endodeoxyribonuclease RusAgp75 (16916)gp73 (16916)    
DNA–cytosine methyltransferase  gp72 (16642)gp72 (16642) gp63 (16642)
RuvC-like resolvase    gp62 (16647)gp66 (16647)
RNA polymerase sigma factorgp77 (16918)gp75 (16918)    
ArpU family/ArpU-like transcriptional regulator  gp78 (16560)gp78 (16560)gp64 (16560)gp68 (16560)
RinA transcriptional activator-like proteingp79 (16920)gp77 (16920)    
Serine recombinase     gp70 (16818)
Phosphomannomutasegp80 (16819)gp78 (16819)   gp71 (16819)
Toxin HicAgp81t(16921)gp79t(16921)    
Antitoxin HicBgp82 (16922)gp80 (16922)gp80 (16649)gp80 (16649)gp65 (16649)gp72 (16649)
Toxin HicA  gp81t(16820)gp81t(16820)gp66 (16650)gp73t(16820)
Transglycosylasegp83 (16651)gp81 (16651)gp83 (16651)gp83 (16651)gp67 (16651)gp 76 (16651)
HNH endonucleasegp86 (16652)gp84 (16652)gp84 (16652)gp84 (16652)gp68 (16652)gp77 (16652)

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to DNA packaging protein

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to head-tail joining protein

CDD matches only (Evalue=1E-123)

Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to bhlA protein

Also has equally strong BLAST matches to DNA methyltransferase

Also has strong BLAST matches to holin

Also has equally strong BLAST matches to peptidase domain

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to integrase

Also has strong BLAST matches to toxin-like protein, DNA Smf single strand binding protein, transcriptional regulatory protein YclJ, phosphatase, transposase

Also has equally strong BLAST matches to integrase, ATPase, resolvase, invertase

Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to peptidase

Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to excisionase

Also has strong BLAST matches to Xre-like protein

Also has strong BLAST matches to repressor

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to Rha family transcriptional regulator

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to chromosomal replication initiator protein DnaA

Also has equally strong BLAST matches to DNA recombination protein RecF

Also has strong BLAST matches to oxidoreductase, putative DNA helicase, putative RecA NTPase, ATP-dependent Lon protease

Also has equally strong BLAST matches to RecA familyATPase

Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to ycfA-like protein

P. larvae phage genes with statistically significant BLAST and/or CDD matches (E-value < 1E-3) to proteins with known function. The gene product number is shown in the first row of each cell, and the pham number is shown in the second row, italicized in parentheses. Rows are colored according to protein function. We classify phage proteins into 6 functional categories: 1) virion particle (blue), 2) virion assembly (burgundy), 3) host lysis (purple), 4) DNA replication/metabolism (tan), 5) gene regulation, including putative transcription factors (green), and 6) host-related functions (yellow). Gene products whose function cannot be classified into these 6 categories due to lack of sufficient information or conflicting information are left uncolored. Instances where there are 2 or more unrelated functions with statistically significant matches are marked with a footnote, with the more statistically significant (or with higher bit score) function listed in the table, and the less statistically significant (or with lower bitscore) function listed in the footnotes at the end of the table. Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to DNA packaging protein Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to head-tail joining protein CDD matches only (Evalue=1E-123) Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to bhlA protein Also has equally strong BLAST matches to DNA methyltransferase Also has strong BLAST matches to holin Also has equally strong BLAST matches to peptidase domain Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to integrase Also has strong BLAST matches to toxin-like protein, DNA Smf single strand binding protein, transcriptional regulatory protein YclJ, phosphatase, transposase Also has equally strong BLAST matches to integrase, ATPase, resolvase, invertase Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to peptidase Also has strong BLAST and CDD matches to excisionase Also has strong BLAST matches to Xre-like protein Also has strong BLAST matches to repressor Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to Rha family transcriptional regulator Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to chromosomal replication initiator protein DnaA Also has equally strong BLAST matches to DNA recombination protein RecF Also has strong BLAST matches to oxidoreductase, putative DNA helicase, putative RecA NTPase, ATP-dependent Lon protease Also has equally strong BLAST matches to RecA familyATPase Also has equally strong BLAST and CDD matches to ycfA-like protein

Virion particle genes

Virion particle genes are clustered near the start of the genome, from position gp3 to gp17. They include a portal protein (gp3), a major capsid protein (gp5), a head-tail connector (gp7), a head-tail adaptor protein (gp8) and a head-tail joining protein (gp9), and 5 or 6 tail proteins, including a major tail protein (gp11), a tail tape measure protein (gp14), and an endopeptidase tail protein (gp16). The head-tail adaptor protein at gp7 also has strong BLAST and CD-Search matches with a “DNA packaging protein.” However, as this is not confirmed and DNA packaging is handled by the terminase, we assigned head-tail adaptor function to this gene product. The tail tape measure protein is encoded by the longest gene in the genome in all of the phages. All the identified virion particle genes are found in all of our phages, except for the head-tail joining protein (gp9) found only in Cluster A phages, and a tail protein (gp10) exclusive to Fern/Willow and Xenia. Virion particle genes are conserved, as they are all single-pham genes, the sole exception being the major tail protein (gp11), which is in 2 phams (see also Fig. 3); one pham for the Cluster A phages (who have the same major tail protein), and one pham for Fern/Willow, and Xenia (who also have the same major tail protein). The tail tape measure protein (gp14) is a single-pham gene, however it follows the same pattern as the major tail protein: Cluster A phages have an identical tail tape measure protein that is different than the tail tape measure protein of Fern/Willow, and Xenia. Both the major tail protein and tail tape measure protein of Cluster A phages are considerably longer than those of Fern/Willow and Xenia, suggesting Cluster A phages have longer tails than Fern/Willow and Xenia. From Fig. 1, we can discern that Diane and Hayley do indeed have a longer tail (∼200 nm) than Fern (∼150 nm).

Virion assembly genes

Assembly genes identified include a small and large terminase (gp1 and gp2, respectively), a Clp protease (gp4) and a prohead protease (gp10). The small and large terminase and the Clp protease are found in all the phages, but the prohead protease at gp10 is only present in Cluster A phages. The assembly genes are all conserved, all of them being single-pham genes.

Host lysis genes

All of our phages encode an N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase endolysin at position gp21. This protein varies between 224 and 226 amino acids in length and is conserved among our phages, as all N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases are in a single pham. In addition, all of our phages encode a transglycosylase near the end of their genomes. Transglycosylases, also known as glycosyltransferases, are known to cleave glycosidic bonds in the host glycan, and are thus used by phages for host lysis. The transglycosylase is conserved, as it is a single-pham gene. In addition, Xenia encodes a protein (gp26) with statistically significant matches to an amidase domain, although nothing more is known about the function of this protein (and it also has statistically significant matches to peptidase domains).

DNA replication and metabolism genes

All our phages encode numerous genes with putative functions related to DNA replication and metabolism. These include transposases, integrases, endonucleases, serine recombinases, excisionases, methyltransferases, and others. This is by far the largest and most diverse functional category. The vast majority of DNA replication and metabolism genes are not conserved among our phages. Only 2 genes in this category, the transposase at gp23/gp22 and the HNH endonuclease (which is the last gene in the phage genomes), are found in all the phages and are conserved. Of significance is that the transposase at gp23/gp22 has significant BLAST matches to proteins with holin function. However, the matches to transposase function are much more statistically significant than to those with holin function (e.g., E-value of 1E-37 compared to 1E-5), thus we assigned it transposase function. A conserved integrase is found in Diane/Vadim/Vegas (gp38), Hayley (gp36), and Fern/Willow (gp32). Harrison and Paisley possess a serine recombinase at gp44 that has equally significant BLAST and CDD matches to integrases, therefore this protein could be an integrase. In addition, Xenia possesses several genes assigned transposase function that have equally significant matches to proteins with integrase function (gp29, gp36, gp37). It is therefore possible and in fact likely that all of our phages possess at least one integrase, indicating they possess lysogenic potential; in fact 2 of our phages (Diane and Fern) were isolated as lysogens that converted to lytic phages in vitro.

Regulatory genes

All 9 P. larvae phages encode genes that regulate gene expression, whether in the host or the phage itself. These include XRE (Xenobiotic response element), Cro/Cl, AbrB (ambiactive repressor) and ArpU (autolysin regulatory protein) family transcriptional regulators, as well as anti-repressor proteins. Many of these proteins, in particular the XRE-family transcriptional regulators, contain a helix-turn-helix domain. However, the function of these proteins in the P. larvae phage life cycle is not known, which suggests these phages use novel methods of gene regulation to modulate host expression in support of their life cycle. These are the least conserved genes in our phages. There is no regulatory gene that is common to all of the phages, and even genes of the same family are divergent, e.g., the XRE family transcriptional regulator at gp41 in Diane/Vadim/Vegas, gp39 in Hayley, gp45 in Harrison and Paisley, and gp33 in Fern/Willow, is in 3 different phams.

Host-related genes

The nine phages also code for a variety of host-related proteins, such as several toxins, 2 ABC transporters, a stress protein, a metallo-hydrolase, a phosphomannomutase, a toxin-antitoxin system, and others. At position gp20 all the phages code for a conserved (single-pham) bacteriocin, a toxin prokaryotes produce to inhibit the growth of closely related competitor strains. This gene also has strong BLAST matches to a “bhlA protein,” an unconfirmed holin-like protein. While this could be the “missing” holin gene, we assigned bacteriocin function due to its much more statistically significant match (E-value < 1E-100 compared to 1E-13). Fern/Willow and Xenia contain a putative metallo-hydrolase, a type of β-lactamase (gp48/58). All of the phages also encode the HicA/HicB toxin/antitoxin system. With the exception of the bacteriocin, none of these genes are conserved. Besides the bacteriocin, only the toxin-antitoxin genes are present in all of the phages, and these are not conserved; the HicA genes are in 3 phams, while the HicB genes are in 2 phams. In Diane/Vadim/Vegas and Hayley the HicA genes are located in front of the HicB genes, while the opposite is true in the other phages.

Gene operons

In every one of our phages' genomes, there are 10 to 15 instances of genes whose start codon is located 3 bp before the stop codon of the gene upstream, suggesting these genes are transcribed together as part of an operon. Of these, the following are operons involving proteins with putative function: The large terminase at gp2 and the portal protein at gp3 (all phages), the Clp protease at gp4 and the major capsid protein at gp5 (all phages), the head-tail connector at gp7 and the head-tail adaptor at gp8 (all phages), which extends to include the head-tail joining protein at gp9 and the prohead protease at gp10 in the Cluster A phages, the major tail protein at gp11 and the hypothetical protein at gp12 (Fern/Willow, Xenia), the tail tape measure protein at gp14 and the tail protein at gp15 (Fern/Willow, Xenia), the endopeptidase tail protein at gp16 and the tail protein at gp17 (all phages), the bacteriocin at gp20 and the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase at gp21 (all phages), the transglycosylase at gp67/gp76 and the HNH endonuclease at gp68/gp77 (Fern/Willow, Xenia).

Multiple alignment of P. larvae phage large terminases

We performed a multiple alignment of the P. larvae phage large terminases using ClustalW in Fig. 6. The alignment showed that there are only 3 distinct large terminases for the 17 known P. larvae phages. Diane/Vadim/Vegas, Hayley, Harrison and Paisley all have the same large terminase (Group 1), as do Fern/Willow, Xenia, Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly, Sitara, HB10c2 and phiIBB_Pl23 (Group 2), with the large terminase of Lily by itself (Group 3). The large terminases follow the classification of the phages based on nucleotide sequence identity, i.e. Cluster A phages all have the Group1 large terminase, while Cluster B phages have the Group 2 large terminase, with Lily an outlier (Fig. 3). From Fig. 6A we observe 11 locations where the Group 1 and Group 2 large terminases differ, corresponding to an amino acid sequence identity of approximately 98% (Fig. 6B). We also note the large terminase of Lily is very distant from the other 2 (10% amino acid identity), and also considerably longer than the other 2 (622 amino acids compared to 574 amino acids). A pham circle of the P. larvae phage large terminase is included as Supplementary Fig. 1.
Figure 6.

Multiple alignment and percent amino acid sequence identity matrix of P. larvae phage large terminases. With the exception of Lily, all P. larvae phages have a large terminase that is either identical to that of Diane (Diane, Hayley, Vadim, Vegas, Harrison, Paisley), or Xenia (Xenia, Fern, Willow, Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly, Sitara, HB10c2, phiIBB_Pl23).

Multiple alignment of P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases

A multiple alignment of the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases of all the P. larvae phages is shown in Fig. 7. There are 5 distinct N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases among the 17 currently sequenced P. larvae phages. Group 1 consists of the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase of Diane/Vadim/Vegas, and Hayley, Group 2 consists of Harrison, Paisley, and phiIBB_Pl23, Group 3 consists of Fern/Willow, Group 4 consists of Xenia, Diva, Shelly and Sitara, and Group 5 consists of HB10c2, Redbud, and Rani. The N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases follow the classification of the phages based on nucleotide sequence identity (Fig. 3), i.e. phages in the same subcluster have the same N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. The 5 different N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases all have >90 % similarity with each other. A pham circle of the P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases is included as Supplementary Fig. 2.
Figure 7.

Multiple alignment and average amino acid identity matrix of P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases. There are 5 distinct P. larvae phage N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases, with phages in the same group having an identical N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. Group 1 consists of phages Diane, Vadim, Vegas and Hayley, Group 2 consists of phages Harrison, Paisley and phiIBB_Pl23, Group 3 consists of phages Willow and Fern, Group 4 consists of phages Xenia, Shelly, Diva, and Sitara, and Group 5 consists of phages HB10c2, Rani, and Redbud.

P. larvae phages use the 3′ cohesive ends DNA packaging strategy

Comparative analysis shows our phages use the cohesive ends with 3′ overhangs DNA packaging strategy. Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly and Sitara (whose large terminases are either 98% or 100% identical with those of our phages) are known to possess 9-bp 3′ overhangs with the sequence “CGACTGCCC.” We found the same 9-bp sequence in Diane/Vadim/Vegas, Hayley, Fern/Willow and Xenia, and rearranged their genomes so that base 1 is the first base immediately after the last overhang base. When the genomes are rearranged this way, the first gene in the genome is the small terminase, which begins 50 bp downstream of base 1, exactly like in Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly and Sitara. When we rearrange the genomes of Harrison and Paisley in this manner, this reveals an overhang whose sequence is “CGACGGACC,” differing by 2 bases from the overhang of the other phages, even though the large terminase of Harrison and Paisley is identical to that of Diane/Vadim/Vegas and Hayley. That P. larvae phages use the 3′ cohesive ends packaging strategy is further confirmed by a phylogenetic tree of the large terminases of the phages in our Phamerator database, shown in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Discussion

In this study we have conducted an in-depth comparative genomic analysis of 9 P. larvae phages recently sequenced and published by our group. These phages were isolated from a variety of sources, such as infected larvae, soil samples, and commercial beeswax products, from different geographical regions of the United States. Interestingly, there are several instances of phages from different locations having a very high degree of nucleotide sequence identity with each other. Phage Fern (lysogenic phage isolated from a wild P. larvae strain) is very similar to phage Willow (soil sample from Washington state); phage Harrison (soil sample from Nevada) is very similar to phage Paisley (soil sample from Pennsylvania); and phages Diane (lysogenic phage isolated from ATCC P. larvae strain), Vadim (commercial beeswax product), Vegas (another commercial beeswax product) and Hayley (soil sample from Nevada) are all very similar to one another. Phage Xenia (isolated from infected larva from a USDA lab in Maryland) shows a very high degree of sequence similarity (99.5%) with phage Shelly, which was isolated in North Carolina by another group. These findings suggest that subsets of P. larvae phages are subject to very similar selection pressures. P. larvae phages can be classified into 2 main clusters based on nucleotide sequence identity (we used a threshold of 60%), both of which can be broken down into 2 or more subclusters, and one singleton (Lily). Cluster A phages (Diane, Vadim, Vegas, Hayley, Harrison, Paisley) show little sequence similarity (∼40%) with Cluster B phages (Fern, Willow, Xenia, Diva, Rani, Redbud, Shelly, Sitara, HB10c2, phiIBB_Pl23). The clusters are themselves heterogeneous and can be further broken down into subclusters that contain phages that are very similar to one another (>90% nucleotide sequence identity), and in the case of Cluster B, several singletons. This is similar to what has been observed in other well-studied phages, such as Mycobacterium phages. As with Mycobacterium phages, we expect that as the number of sequenced P. larvae phages increases over time, the clusters and subclusters will increase in number and grow in size and diversity. Comparative genomic analysis of the 9 new P. larvae phages shows that the majority of their genes are only found in P. larvae phages. Using bioinformatics tools alone, we were able to predict putative functions for about half of the genes of the new P. larvae phages. We found genes coding for virion particle proteins, virion assembly proteins, host lysis proteins, DNA replication and metabolism proteins, regulatory proteins, and host-related proteins. Almost all of the virion particle and assembly genes are found in all our phages and are conserved, indicating similar morphology and assembly mechanisms. The tail proteins may possess catalytic activity (e.g., gp16 may have endopeptidase activity), which would allow the phages to penetrate into their host; more work is needed to understand how P. larvae phages invade their hosts. On the other hand, the DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory genes, and host-related genes are generally not conserved. Many of the DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory, and host-related genes are found in some of the phages but are absent from others. This suggests diverse and potentially novel DNA replication and gene regulation mechanisms at the transcriptional level. More work is needed to understand the functions of many of the DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory, and host-related genes, as their precise role in P. larvae phage and/or P. larvae biology is not known. The host-related genes are of particular interest as they include genes implicated in antibiotic resistance, such as a β-lactamase, and host virulence, such as toxins, a bacteriocin, and a toxin-antitoxin system. These genes may be used by the phages, once integrated into the host chromosome, to promote their spread by assisting infected P. larvae in outcompeting bacterial competitors and in defending against antibiotics. In terms of genome architecture, the conserved virion particle and assembly genes are located at the front end of the genome in synteny, typical of Siphoviridae phage genomes. It is possible, and in fact likely, that genes located in this genomic region whose function cannot be inferred from sequence comparison alone, such as gp6, gp9, gp12, gp13, gp18 and gp19 encode virion particle or assembly genes, but more work is needed to identify the function of these genes. The divergent DNA replication/metabolism, regulatory and host-related genes are located downstream of the virion particle and assembly genes. The genomes of our P. larvae phages converge at the ends, where a conserved transglycosylase and HNH endonuclease are located. All of the new phages encode a highly conserved N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase endolysin. Multiple alignment of the P. larvae phages' N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase revealed that there are 5 distinct N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases among the 17 currently sequenced P. larvae phages, all with >90% amino acid sequence identity to each other. Phages grouped in the same subcluster by nucleotide sequence identity have the same N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, suggesting subsets of P. larvae phages lyse slightly different hosts. Many bacteriophages lyse their hosts by means of a holin/endolysin cassette. The new P. larvae phages seem to lack a holin on first inspection, although they do encode for at least 2 proteins with significant matches to holin or holin-like proteins (the bacteriocin at gp20 and the transposase at gp23/gp22). It could be that either (or perhaps both) of these proteins are indeed holins used by the P. larvae phages. This possibility is reinforced by the fact that both genes are located proximally to the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, and that the putative bacteriocin is part of the same operon with the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. Holins are generally not conserved, and are therefore difficult to detect bioinformatically, thus more work is needed in this area. The phages also code for a transglycosylase, raising the interesting possibility that P. larvae phages have more than one lytic mechanism. The fact that the transglycosylase is found in all our phages and is conserved (all transglyosylases are in the same pham), lends additional support to this hypothesis. This gene occurs in a region of the genome that is not conserved, suggesting it may have spread by horizontal gene transfer. More work is needed to discern the mechanisms of how P. larvae phages lyse their hosts. All the phages also encode at least one transposase and likely one integrase. Thus in addition to lytic activity, they also appear to possess lysogenic activity. However these proteins are not conserved among our phages, pointing to potentially different lysogenic mechanisms. Analysis of the large terminase protein indicated that there are only 3 distinct large terminases among the 17 currently sequenced P. larvae phages. Two of the large terminases are very similar to each other, having 98% amino acid sequence identity between them. These 2 large terminases account for 16 of the 17 P. larvae phages, the sole exception being the large terminase of phage Lily, which is very divergent from the other two (i.e. Cluster A and Cluster B). Phages in the same cluster have the same large terminase. All our P. larvae phages use the “cohesive ends with 9-bp 3′ overhangs” strategy, consistent with all other sequenced P. larvae phages (with the sole exception of phage Lily). In recent years there has been a surge of interest in P. larvae phages, partly due to their potential to treat AFB. The number of sequenced P. larvae phages has increased from 0 at the start of 2013, to 17 as of this writing, and is likely to grow significantly. Our comparative genomic study is the first of its kind, and we expect to see much growth in P. larvae genomics in the coming years. Key areas to be addressed are identifying the function of more P. larvae phage proteins, the evolutionary history of P. larvae phages, the mechanisms by which P. larvae phages lyse their hosts, including identification of P. larvae phage holins and the role of transglycosylase, and the role of phage-encoded β-lactamases and toxins in P. larvae antibiotic resistance and virulence. Other potential areas of interest are the mechanism by which P. larvae phages penetrate their host, the relationship of P. larvae phages to their hosts in the wild, including the phages' role in horizontal gene transfer, identifying uses of P. larvae phage proteins for biotechnology applications, understanding how P. larvae defend against infection from phages, and further studies on the use of P. larvae phages as a treatment of AFB.

Materials and methods

Phages were isolated from a variety of sources and amplified using P. larvae NRRL 2605. Details of the isolation and amplification process are given in. Assembly was carried out using Geneious 7.1 (Biomatters, Auckland, NZ). Details of the assembly process are given in. Genomes were annotated using DNA Master (cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu), which includes the gene calling programs Glimmer (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/glimmer) and GeneMark (exon.gatech.edu). We also used GeneMark.hmm (exon.gatech.edu). Details of the annotation procedure are given in. Dot plots were obtained with Gepard 1.30 (cube.univie.ac.at/gepard). The percent nucleotide sequence identity between phage genomes was obtained by performing a multiple alignment using ClustalW, using the IUB cost matrix. Protein alignments were performed using ClustalW using the BLOSUM62 cost matrix. Protein phylogenetic trees were constructed using Clustal Omega. Putative protein function was inferred from manual curation of searches of NCBI's non-redundant protein database with BLASTP, and searches of NCBI's Conserved Domain Database (CDD) with CD-Search, both with an E-value cutoff of 1E-3. In cases where the searches returned multiple conflicting results, the result with the lowest E-value was chosen (unless the result was a “hypothetical protein,” in which case the result with the lowest E-value that wasn't a hypothetical protein was entered). In cases where there were conflicting results with equal E-value, the bit score was used as a tie-breaker. Phage genome maps and pham circles were obtained from Phamerator. Phage genome maps were obtained using the “Align Two Sequences” algorithm of BLASTN and default window and step size, and an E-value cutoff of 1E-4. Genes with percent nucleotide identity >32.5% as calculated using ClustalW and BLAST E-value < 1E-50 were grouped into the same “pham”. The Phamerator database was populated with Bacillus and non-Bacillus phages whose proteins appeared in our BLAST results with E-value < 1E-3, as in. The full list of phages in our Phamerator database, their accession number, and host, is included as Supplementary Table 3.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Application of bacteriophages for detection and control of foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  Steven Hagens; Martin J Loessner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Pros and cons of phage therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Loc-Carrillo; Stephen T Abedon
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping.

Authors:  Elke Genersch
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics.

Authors:  Steven G Cresawn; Matt Bogel; Nathan Day; Deborah Jacobs-Sera; Roger W Hendrix; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Functional analysis of a putative holin-like peptide-coding gene in the genome of Bacillus licheniformis AnBa9.

Authors:  Thangamani Anthony; Gunasekaran Stalin Chellappa; Thangamani Rajesh; Paramasamy Gunasekaran
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.552

6.  Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.

Authors:  Fabian Sievers; Andreas Wilm; David Dineen; Toby J Gibson; Kevin Karplus; Weizhong Li; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Michael Remmert; Johannes Söding; Julie D Thompson; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

7.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Complete Genome Sequence of the Broad-Host-Range Paenibacillus larvae Phage phiIBB_Pl23.

Authors:  Ana Oliveira; Luís D R Melo; Andrew M Kropinski; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-09-05

9.  CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database.

Authors:  Aron Marchler-Bauer; John B Anderson; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Carol DeWeese-Scott; Jessica H Fong; Lewis Y Geer; Renata C Geer; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; Siqian He; David I Hurwitz; John D Jackson; Zhaoxi Ke; Christopher J Lanczycki; Cynthia A Liebert; Chunlei Liu; Fu Lu; Shennan Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; Mikhail Mullokandov; James S Song; Asba Tasneem; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Dachuan Zhang; Naigong Zhang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Whole genome comparison of a large collection of mycobacteriophages reveals a continuum of phage genetic diversity.

Authors:  Welkin H Pope; Charles A Bowman; Daniel A Russell; Deborah Jacobs-Sera; David J Asai; Steven G Cresawn; William R Jacobs; Roger W Hendrix; Jeffrey G Lawrence; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genomic Analysis of 48 Paenibacillus larvae Bacteriophages.

Authors:  Casey Stamereilers; Christopher P Fajardo; Jamison K Walker; Katterinne N Mendez; Eduardo Castro-Nallar; Julianne H Grose; Sandra Hope; Philippos K Tsourkas
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.048

2.  Identification of the first endolysin Cell Binding Domain (CBD) targeting Paenibacillus larvae.

Authors:  Sílvio B Santos; Ana Oliveira; Luís D R Melo; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Characterization of CRISPR Spacer and Protospacer Sequences in Paenibacillus larvae and Its Bacteriophages.

Authors:  Casey Stamereilers; Simon Wong; Philippos K Tsourkas
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Complete Genome Sequences of Paenibacillus larvae Phages BN12, Dragolir, Kiel007, Leyra, Likha, Pagassa, PBL1c, and Tadhana.

Authors:  Jamison K Walker; Bryan D Merrill; Jordan A Berg; Aziza Dhalai; Douglas W Dingman; Chris P Fajardo; Kiel Graves; Hunter L Hill; Jared A Hilton; Cameron Imahara; Bradley K Knabe; James Mangohig; Josh Monk; Heejin Mun; Ashley M Payne; Alicia Salisbury; Casey Stamereilers; Kathie Velez; Andy T Ward; Donald P Breakwell; Julianne H Grose; Sandra Hope; Philippos K Tsourkas
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2018-06-14

5.  Isolation and Characterization of Phages Active against Paenibacillus larvae Causing American Foulbrood in Honeybees in Poland.

Authors:  Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak; Barbara Owczarek; Ewa Popiela; Kinga Świtała-Jeleń; Paweł Migdał; Martyna Cieślik; Norbert Łodej; Dominika Kula; Joanna Neuberg; Katarzyna Hodyra-Stefaniak; Marta Kaszowska; Filip Orwat; Natalia Bagińska; Anna Mucha; Agnieszka Belter; Mirosława Skupińska; Barbara Bubak; Wojciech Fortuna; Sławomir Letkiewicz; Paweł Chorbiński; Beata Weber-Dąbrowska; Adam Roman; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.