Literature DB >> 2714130

Multivariate analysis of a tissue CEA, TPA, and CA 19.9 quantitative study in colorectal cancer patients. A preliminary finding.

M Cosimelli1, F De Peppo, M Castelli, D Giannarelli, G Schinaia, P Castaldo, G L Buttini, F Sciarretta, G Bigotti, F Di Filippo.   

Abstract

Tissue CEA, TPA, and CA 19.9 concentrations from samples of surgical specimens were measured in 47 evaluable colorectal cancer patients (median follow-up, 20 months, 13 recurrences) and correlated with individual patient follow-up status. The quantitative method appeared to be sensitive, easily reproducible, and standardizable. The tissue marker concentration was analyzed by means of the multivariate discriminant analysis, to evaluate the risk of relapse in each patient; the tumor CEA (CEA T) showed the best discriminant capacity (P = .005). The relative Fisher function provided a reliable prognostic patient index, independently of other recognized prognostic factors (Dukes' stage and cellular differentiation grade). The Cox model showed a statistical significance analyzing the tumor (T) and healthy mucosa (M) CEA values (P = .001 and P = .006, respectively). The combination of these two variables allowed for identification of three classes of patients according to CEA T and M threshold values of 216 and 85 ng/mg of protein, respectively, and different disease-free curves were obtained for each group. The two-year disease-free rate was 81 percent for patients with low values of both CEA T and M, and 21.4 percent for the group with both values above these thresholds (P = .0008). In the third class (CEA T or M higher than the reported cut-off levels), the two-year disease-free rate was 65.9 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2714130     DOI: 10.1007/BF02563690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cell surface molecules and their prognostic values in assessing colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  J Haier; M Nasralla; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Radioimmuno-guided endoscopy (RIGE) in the detection of primary and recurrent rectal tumor.

Authors:  U Prati; L Roveda; R Butera; S Nazari; E Trespi; C Aprile; A Zonta
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Carcinoembryonic antigen: function in metastasis by human colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Jessup; P Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 4.  Cell surface markers in colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Jerry Zhou; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  CEACAM6 as detected by the AP11 antibody is a marker notable for mucin-producing adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Ok-Jun Lee; Seung-Myoung Son; Kwon Pyo Hong; Yong-Moon Lee; Min-Young Kim; Jae-Woon Choi; Sang-Jeon Lee; Young-Jin Song; Hak Soon Kim; Wun-Jae Kim; See-Ok Shin; Hyung Geun Song
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Correlation Between Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Expression on Pancreatic and Rectal Cancer Tissue.

Authors:  L S F Boogerd; F A Vuijk; C E S Hoogstins; H J M Handgraaf; M J M van der Valk; P J K Kuppen; C F M Sier; C J H van de Velde; J Burggraaf; A Fariña-Sarasqueta; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17

7.  Selection of optimal molecular targets for tumor-specific imaging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Willemieke S Tummers; Arantza Farina-Sarasqueta; Martin C Boonstra; Hendrica A Prevoo; Cornelis F Sier; Jan S Mieog; Johannes Morreau; Casper H van Eijck; Peter J Kuppen; Cornelis J van de Velde; Bert A Bonsing; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.