J Haier1, M Nasralla, G L Nicolson. 1. The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, California 92649-10941, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Carcinomas of the colon and rectum are the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although advances in the surgical treatment of primary colorectal cancers have lead to improvements in patient survival at early tumor stages, treatment of more progressive cancers has not resulted in dramatic improvements in patient survival. However, the selection of patient subgroups based on their prognosis and other characteristics could result in improved outcomes from adjuvant therapies in patients with Dukes B and C carcinomas. METHODS: The authors reviewed the available data on the value of cell surface molecules in assessing the prognosis of colorectal carcinomas, paying specific attention to the evaluation of statistical analysis and multivariate procedures. RESULTS: Cell surface molecules have been identified on colorectal carcinoma cells whose expression appears to be related to malignant transformation, tumor progression, or patient prognosis. Among these cell surface molecules, various cell adhesion molecules, growth factor receptors, proteinases, and their receptors and inhibitors have been identified as potentially useful prognostic markers. CONCLUSIONS: Although data exist on the prognostic values of certain cell surface markers, the use of multivariate analysis for the identification of valuable prognostic factors remains uncommon. Using reproducible and standardized multivariate analysis procedures, new tumor markers should be carefully examined for their biologic and prognostic relevance before being considered as potentially useful in the management of colorectal cancers.
OBJECTIVE:Carcinomas of the colon and rectum are the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although advances in the surgical treatment of primary colorectal cancers have lead to improvements in patient survival at early tumor stages, treatment of more progressive cancers has not resulted in dramatic improvements in patient survival. However, the selection of patient subgroups based on their prognosis and other characteristics could result in improved outcomes from adjuvant therapies in patients with Dukes B and C carcinomas. METHODS: The authors reviewed the available data on the value of cell surface molecules in assessing the prognosis of colorectal carcinomas, paying specific attention to the evaluation of statistical analysis and multivariate procedures. RESULTS: Cell surface molecules have been identified on colorectal carcinoma cells whose expression appears to be related to malignant transformation, tumor progression, or patient prognosis. Among these cell surface molecules, various cell adhesion molecules, growth factor receptors, proteinases, and their receptors and inhibitors have been identified as potentially useful prognostic markers. CONCLUSIONS: Although data exist on the prognostic values of certain cell surface markers, the use of multivariate analysis for the identification of valuable prognostic factors remains uncommon. Using reproducible and standardized multivariate analysis procedures, new tumor markers should be carefully examined for their biologic and prognostic relevance before being considered as potentially useful in the management of colorectal cancers.
Authors: W F Grigioni; G Biagini; A D Errico; M Milani; V Villanacci; S Garbisa; S Mattioli; G Gozzetti; A M Mancini Journal: Acta Pathol Jpn Date: 1986-02
Authors: M Cosimelli; F De Peppo; M Castelli; D Giannarelli; G Schinaia; P Castaldo; G L Buttini; F Sciarretta; G Bigotti; F Di Filippo Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1989-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: M d'Istria; S Fasano; F Catuogno; F Gaeta; L Bucci; G Benassai; F Mazzeo; G Delrio Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1986-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Nikolaos Vassos; Tilman Rau; Susanne Merkel; Fabian Feiersinger; Carol I Geppert; Michael Stürzl; Werner Hohenberger; Roland S Croner Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2013-12-15
Authors: Carsten N Gutt; Lars Brinkmann; Arianeb Mehrabi; Hamidreza Fonouni; Beat P Müller-Stich; Gregor Vetter; Jürgen M Stein; Peter Schemmer; Markus W Büchler Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 5.614