Literature DB >> 27141033

Impact of the National Health Service Health Check on cardiovascular disease risk: a difference-in-differences matching analysis.

Kiara Chu-Mei Chang1, John Tayu Lee2, Eszter P Vamos2, Michael Soljak2, Desmond Johnston2, Kamlesh Khunti2, Azeem Majeed2, Christopher Millett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Health Check program in England is the largest cardiovascular risk assessment and management program in the world. We assessed the effect of this program on modelled risk of cardiovascular disease, individual risk factors for cardiovascular disease, prescribing of relevant medications and diagnosis of vascular disease.
METHODS: We obtained retrospective electronic medical records for a randomly selected sample of 138 788 patients aged 40-74 years registered with 462 English general practices participating in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 2009 and 2013. We used a quasi-experimental design of difference-indifferences matching analysis to compare changes in outcomes between Health Check attendees and nonattendees, with a median follow-up time of 2 years.
RESULTS: Overall, 21.4% of the eligible population attended a Health Check. After matching (n = 29 672 in each group), attendees had a significant absolute reduction in modelled risk for cardiovascular disease (-0.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24% to -0.19%) and individual risk factors: systolic blood pressure (-2.51 mm Hg, 95% CI -2.77 to -2.25 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (-1.46 mm Hg, 95% CI -1.62 to -1.29 mm Hg), body mass index (-0.27, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.20) and total cholesterol (-0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.13 mmol/L). Statins were prescribed for 39.9% of attendees who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease. The program resulted in significantly more diagnoses of selected vascular diseases among attendees, with the largest increases for hypertension (2.99%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (1.31%).
INTERPRETATION: The National Health Service Health Check program had statistically significant but clinically modest impacts on modelled risk for cardiovascular disease and individual risk factors, although diagnosis of vascular disease increased. Overall program performance was substantially below national and international targets, which highlights the need for careful planning, monitoring and evaluation of similar initiatives internationally.
© 2016 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27141033      PMCID: PMC4938708          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  31 in total

1.  Agreement between GPRD smoking data: a survey of general practitioners and a population-based survey.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Colleen Brensinger
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore.

Authors:  Kristel J M Janssen; A Rogier T Donders; Frank E Harrell; Yvonne Vergouwe; Qingxia Chen; Diederick E Grobbee; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Missing data.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; J Martin Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-24

4.  The Canadian heart health strategy and action plan.

Authors:  Eldon R Smith
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases.

Authors:  R Lawrenson; T Williams; R Farmer
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1999-09

6.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

7.  Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  J Robson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland; Yana Vinogradova; John Robson; Rubin Minhas; Aziz Sheikh; Peter Brindle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-23

9.  Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: a validation study.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; C Coupland; Y Vinogradova; J Robson; P Brindle
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Herrett; Sara L Thomas; W Marieke Schoonen; Liam Smeeth; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  34 in total

1.  NHS Health Check: national evaluation findings and implications.

Authors:  John N Newton; Katherine Thompson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The authors respond to "NHS Health Check: national evaluation findings and implications".

Authors:  Kiara C-M Chang; Azeem Majeed; Eszter P Vamos; Michael Soljak; Christopher Millett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Evaluating the Risk of Macrovascular Events and Mortality Among People With Multiple Sclerosis in England.

Authors:  Raffaele Palladino; Ruth Ann Marrie; Azeem Majeed; Jeremy Chataway
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Martin; Catherine L Saunders; Emma Harte; Simon J Griffin; Calum MacLure; Jonathan Mant; Catherine Meads; Fiona M Walter; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Cost effectiveness of case-finding strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modelling study.

Authors:  Catriona Crossan; Joanne Lord; Ronan Ryan; Leo Nherera; Tom Marshall
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  NHS Health Check comorbidity and management: an observational matched study in primary care.

Authors:  John Robson; Isabel Dostal; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Aziz Sheikh; Sally Hull; Kambiz Boomla; Chris Griffiths; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017.

Authors:  John Robson; Cesar Garriga; Carol Coupland; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.302

8.  General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 9.  Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katie Mills; Emma Harte; Adam Martin; Calum MacLure; Simon J Griffin; Jonathan Mant; Catherine Meads; Catherine L Saunders; Fiona M Walter; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The cost-effectiveness of population Health Checks: have the NHS Health Checks been unfairly maligned?

Authors:  Sebastian Hinde; Laura Bojke; Gerry Richardson; Lise Retat; Laura Webber
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.