Literature DB >> 27140987

Cancer Drugs Provide Positive Value In Nine Countries, But The United States Lags In Health Gains Per Dollar Spent.

Sebastian Salas-Vega1, Elias Mossialos2.   

Abstract

Cancer drugs account for a growing share of health care expenditure, raising questions about how much value is gained from their use. We used a proprietary international data set to examine real-world cancer drug consumption and expenditure in the period 2004-14 in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States and to explore the value obtained. Even after adjusting for population and epidemiological factors, we found that the United States spent more than the other countries on cancer drugs, yet it often had lower utilization. All nine countries-most notably France and Japan-witnessed an improvement in neoplasm-related years of potential life lost, which suggests that although the costs of drugs have risen, their therapeutic benefits have increased as well. Net economic value derived from cancer drug expenditures appears to have remained positive, with base-case analyses indicating that the United States obtained an estimated $32.6 billion in net positive return from cancer drug care in 2014. However, the United States lags behind other countries in health gains obtained per dollar spent on cancer drugs, which suggests an opportunity to improve value in the oncology drug market. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncology; comparative study; drug expenditure; value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27140987     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  6 in total

1.  Cancer drug expenditure in British Columbia and Saskatchewan: a trend analysis.

Authors:  Reka Pataky; David A Tran; Andrea Coronado; Riaz Alvi; Darryl Boehm; Dean A Regier; Stuart Peacock
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 2.  Financial toxicity and implications for cancer care in the era of molecular and immune therapies.

Authors:  George Tran; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

3.  Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Ryan D Chow; Elizabeth H Bradley; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Economic Evaluation of Fulvestrant 500 mg Compared to Generic Aromatase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Sweden.

Authors:  Ugne Sabale; Mattias Ekman; Daniel Thunström; Claire Telford; Christopher Livings
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-12

5.  Cost-effectiveness of cancer drugs: Comparative analysis of the United States and England.

Authors:  Avi Cherla; Matthew Renwick; Ashish Jha; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-11-05

6.  Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.

Authors:  Courtney Davis; Huseyin Naci; Evrim Gurpinar; Elita Poplavska; Ashlyn Pinto; Ajay Aggarwal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.