Y Yang1, J Dong2, Y Huang3. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, Yunnan, 650118, China. Electronic address: yangyl58@163.com. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, Yunnan, 650118, China. Electronic address: 150586763@qq.com. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, Yunnan, 650118, China. Electronic address: hycyn2008@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some studies compared the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic thymectomy (OT) with open thymectomy (TT) in the treatment of thymoma, but the results remained controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic thymectomy in comparison with open thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched in databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Comparative studies of thoracoscopic thymectomy and open thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma were included. Both short-term perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 14 Eligible studies were identified through electronic databases. Our analysis suggested, when compared with open thymectomy, patients having thoracoscopy might benefit from less blood loss (p = 0.004), lower blood transfusion rate (p = 0.02), shorter mean duration of chest tube (p = 0.002), hospital stay (p < 0.001) and lower complication (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in 5-year OS rate (p = 0.14) and DFS/RFS rate (p = 0.07) between two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that thoracoscopic thymectomy could become a valid alternative to open thymectomy in selected patients with thymoma.
BACKGROUND: Some studies compared the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic thymectomy (OT) with open thymectomy (TT) in the treatment of thymoma, but the results remained controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic thymectomy in comparison with open thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched in databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Comparative studies of thoracoscopic thymectomy and open thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma were included. Both short-term perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 14 Eligible studies were identified through electronic databases. Our analysis suggested, when compared with open thymectomy, patients having thoracoscopy might benefit from less blood loss (p = 0.004), lower blood transfusion rate (p = 0.02), shorter mean duration of chest tube (p = 0.002), hospital stay (p < 0.001) and lower complication (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in 5-year OS rate (p = 0.14) and DFS/RFS rate (p = 0.07) between two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that thoracoscopic thymectomy could become a valid alternative to open thymectomy in selected patients with thymoma.
Authors: Fabrizio Minervini; Laura Boschetti; Michael Gregor; Mariano Provencio; Virginia Calvo; Peter B Kestenholz; Savvas Lampridis; Davide Patrini; Pietro Bertoglio; L Filipe Azenha; Consolato M Sergi; Gregor J Kocher Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2021-11