Literature DB >> 27139500

Switching Patients to Home-Based Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin: an Economic Evaluation of an Interprofessional Drug Therapy Management Program.

Clemence Perraudin1,2, Aline Bourdin3,4, Francois Spertini5, Jérôme Berger3,4, Olivier Bugnon3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) therapy is an alternative to hospital-based intravenous infusions (IVIg). However, SCIg requires patient training and long-term support to ensure proper adherence, optimal efficacy and safety. We evaluated if switching patients to home-based SCIg including an interprofessional drug therapy management program (physician, community pharmacist and nurse) would be cost-effective within the Swiss healthcare system.
METHODS: A 3-year cost-minimization analysis was performed from a societal perspective comparing monthly IVIg in an outpatient clinic and home-based weekly SCIg including an interprofessional program. Healthcare costs (immunoglobulin, professional time, infusion pump and disposables) were derived from administrative data. Transportation and productivity loss were estimated by expert opinion. The results were expressed in Swiss francs (CHF) and converted to Euros and US dollars (1 CHF = 0.92€, 1 CHF = $1.02; www.xe.com , 12/14/2015).
RESULTS: Under base case assumptions, SCIg was estimated to cost 35,862 CHF (33,134€; $36,595) per patient during the first year and 30,309 CHF (28,004€; $30,929) in subsequent years versus 35,370 CHF (32,679€; $36,095) per year for IVIg. The total savings from switching to SCIg with the interprofessional program were 9630 CHF (8897€; $9828) per patient over 3 years. The results were relatively sensitive to the cost per gram of IgG, the cost of equipment and the annual number of infusions.
CONCLUSION: Home-based SCIg including an interprofessional therapy management program may be an efficient alternative for patients. The program provides long-term support from self-administration training to the responsible use of therapy (proper adherence, optimal efficacy and safety). Over the short term, additional costs from purchasing equipment and the drug therapy management program were offset by avoiding hospital costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunoglobulin; interprofessional; intravenous; management program; subcutaneous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27139500     DOI: 10.1007/s10875-016-0288-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0271-9142            Impact factor:   8.317


  26 in total

1.  Agammaglobulinemia.

Authors:  O C BRUTON
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1952-06       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunedeficiency diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home.

Authors:  Uwe Nicolay; Peter Kiessling; Melvin Berger; Sudhir Gupta; Leman Yel; Chaim M Roifman; Ann Gardulf; Florian Eichmann; Stefan Haag; Cordula Massion; Hans D Ochs
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  [Subcutaneous immunoglobulin and support program: what level of interest of patients?].

Authors:  A Bourdin; J Berger; A Früh; F Spertini; O Bugnon
Journal:  Rev Med Suisse       Date:  2015-04-08

4.  Economic and quality of life evaluation of different modalities of immunoglobulin therapy in chronic dysimmune neuropathies.

Authors:  Dario Cocito; Grazia Serra; Ilaria Paolasso; Diego A Barilà; Leonardo Lopiano; Luigi Cattel
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Why I use subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG).

Authors:  Ralph S Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 8.317

6.  Clinical ambiguities--ongoing questions.

Authors:  Troy R Torgerson; Vincent R Bonagura; Ralph S Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 8.317

7.  [Economic evaluation of at home subcutaneous and intravenous immunoglobulin substitution].

Authors:  L Haddad; M Perrinet; D Parent; A Leroy-Cotteau; E Toguyeni; G Condette-Wojtasik; E Hachulla
Journal:  Rev Med Interne       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 0.728

Review 8.  Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route.

Authors:  Ann Gardulf
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.807

9.  Subcutaneous vs intravenous administration of immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: an Italian cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Carlo Lazzaro; Leonardo Lopiano; Dario Cocito
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Economic evaluation of immunoglobulin replacement in patients with primary antibody deficiencies.

Authors:  J Beauté; P Levy; V Millet; M Debré; Y Dudoit; L Le Mignot; A Tajahmady; C Thomas; F Suarez; I Pellier; O Hermine; N Aladjidi; N Mahlaoui; A Fischer
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for dosing immunoglobulin in obese patients.

Authors:  J P Hodkinson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Cost Utility of Lifelong Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy vs Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant to Treat Agammaglobulinemia.

Authors:  Di Sun; Jennifer R Heimall; Matthew J Greenhawt; Nancy J Bunin; Marcus S Shaker; Neil Romberg
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 3.  Optimizing the Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Biotherapeutics Through Mechanochemical Drivers.

Authors:  D S Collins; L C Kourtis; N R Thyagarajapuram; R Sirkar; S Kapur; M W Harrison; D J Bryan; G B Jones; J M Wright
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Treatment Satisfaction with Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: a Pooled Analysis of Six Hizentra® Studies.

Authors:  Rajiv Mallick; Stephen Jolles; Hirokazu Kanegane; Dominique Agbor-Tarh; Mikhail Rojavin
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 8.317

5.  Outcome Evaluation of a Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Clinical Management Program.

Authors:  Julia Zhu; Gretchen Ayer; Heather S Kirkham; Chi-Chang Chen; Rolin L Wade; Swapna U Karkare; Chester H Robson; Jordan S Orange
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients: A Swiss cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Clémence Perraudin; Aline Bourdin; Alex Vicino; Thierry Kuntzer; Olivier Bugnon; Jérôme Berger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-minimization analysis of immunoglobulin treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Spain.

Authors:  J Bruno Montoro; Pedro Moral Moral; Olaf Neth; Marta Ortiz Pica; Silvia Sánchez-Ramón; Laia Alsina; María Presa; Itziar Oyagüez; Miguel Ángel Casado; Luis Ignacio González-Granado
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-09-21

8.  An evaluation of the budget impact of a new 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig20Gly) for the management of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Switzerland.

Authors:  Richard F Pollock; Lisa M Meckley
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.