| Literature DB >> 28707164 |
D S Collins1, L C Kourtis1, N R Thyagarajapuram1, R Sirkar1, S Kapur1, M W Harrison1, D J Bryan2, G B Jones3, J M Wright1.
Abstract
The subcutaneous route offers myriad benefits for the administration of biotherapeutics in both acute and chronic diseases, including convenience, cost effectiveness and the potential for automation through closed-loop systems. Recent advances in parenteral administration devices and the use of additives which enhance drug dispersion have generated substantial additional interest in IV to SQ switching studies. Designing pre-clinical and clinical studies using SQ mediated delivery however requires deep understanding of complex inter-related physiologies and transport pathways governing the interstitial matrix, vascular system and lymphatic channels. This expert review will highlight key structural features which contribute to transport and biodistribution in the subcutaneous space and also assess the impact of drug formulations. Based on the rapidly growing interest in the SQ delivery route, a number of potential areas for future development are highlighted, which are likely to allow continued evolution and innovation in this important area.Entities:
Keywords: biodistribution; biologics; drug delivery; lymphatics; subcutaneous
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28707164 PMCID: PMC5579144 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2229-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Res ISSN: 0724-8741 Impact factor: 4.200
Fig. 1Interstitial matrix components surrounding lymphatic and vascular network (lymphatics = green) for injected drugs (r) and structures of key glycosaminoglycans (l).
Fig. 3Lymphatic ducts and nodes (left) and lymphatic drainage points (right).
Fig. 2Endothelial lumen and clefts involved in fluid transport to lymphatic system.
Fig. 4Electrostatic potential map of Pembrolizumab (sequence 5DK3, PDB) rendered in PyMOL (92).
Potential Areas for Future Research and Innovation in SQ Drug Delivery
| 1. accurate determination of net charges on candidate proteins and formulants |
| 2. the impact of mechanical forces (massage, stretching) on lymphatic flow and drug uptake |
| 3. the impact of hydration, and disruption of hydrogen bonding (ultrasound) in drug dispersion and uptake |
| 4. the potential for electrical stimulation of drug uptake via pulsed and linear processes |
| 5. thermal processes that improve drug uptake and patient nociception (e.g. RF) |
| 6. processes which enhance dissipation of injected plumes to lymphatic capillaries |
| 7. the impact of adjuvants to enhance drug uptake including |
| -integrin receptor inhibitors to induce edema / drug influx |
| -lipolysis inducers for drug dispersion and uptake |
| -endothelial targeting agents which promote lymphatic cleft opening and trafficking |
| -analgesics which increase patient pain thresholds for the introduction of large injected volumes ( |
| -co-administration of protease inhibitors to enhance bioavailability ( |
| 8.Exploring the utility of mAb-FcRn targeting chimeras to enhance lymphatic uptake |