Literature DB >> 27138012

The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.

Geoff Hollis1, Chris Westbury2.   

Abstract

Notable progress has been made recently on computational models of semantics using vector representations for word meaning (Mikolov, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013; Mikolov, Sutskever, Chen, Corrado, & Dean, 2013). As representations of meaning, recent models presumably hone in on plausible organizational principles for meaning. We performed an analysis on the organization of the skip-gram model's semantic space. Consistent with human performance (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957), the skip-gram model primarily relies on affective distinctions to organize meaning. We showed that the skip-gram model accounts for unique variance in behavioral measures of lexical access above and beyond that accounted for by affective and lexical measures. We also raised the possibility that word frequency predicts behavioral measures of lexical access due to the fact that word use is organized by semantics. Deconstruction of the semantic representations in semantic models has the potential to reveal organizing principles of human semantics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affect; Co-occurrence; Emotion; Language; Meaning; Principal components analysis; Semantic differential; Semantics; Skip-gram

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27138012     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.

Authors:  S A McDonald; R C Shillcock
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.

Authors:  Michael N Jones; Douglas J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?

Authors:  Paweł Mandera; Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Memory as a hologram: an analysis of learning and recall.

Authors:  Donald R J Franklin; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2015-03

5.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

6.  You can't drink a word: lexical and individual emotionality affect subjective familiarity judgments.

Authors:  Chris Westbury
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

7.  The unexplained nature of reading.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Suzanne J Marquis; Maura G Sabatos-DeVito; Zachary Estes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Paula Lacey; Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

Review 9.  Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature.

Authors:  Yulia Esaulova; Lisa von Stockhausen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Now you see it, now you don't: on emotion, context, and the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments.

Authors:  Chris F Westbury; Cyrus Shaoul; Geoff Hollis; Lisa Smithson; Benny B Briesemeister; Markus J Hofmann; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.

Authors:  Bill Thompson; Seán G Roberts; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-10

2.  Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models.

Authors:  Geoff Hollis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

Review 3.  Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: some lessons learnt from LSA.

Authors:  Guillermo Jorge-Botana; Ricardo Olmos; José María Luzón
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-09-25

4.  Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models.

Authors:  Jack E Taylor; Guillaume A Rousselet; Christoph Scheepers; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-14

Review 5.  Beyond the Benchmarks: Toward Human-Like Lexical Representations.

Authors:  Suzanne Stevenson; Paola Merlo
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  People Can Create Iconic Vocalizations to Communicate Various Meanings to Naïve Listeners.

Authors:  Marcus Perlman; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Augmenting Semantic Lexicons Using Word Embeddings and Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Thayer Alshaabi; Colin M Van Oort; Mikaela Irene Fudolig; Michael V Arnold; Christopher M Danforth; Peter Sheridan Dodds
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-24

8.  subs2vec: Word embeddings from subtitles in 55 languages.

Authors:  Jeroen van Paridon; Bill Thompson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

9.  The neural representation of abstract words may arise through grounding word meaning in language itself.

Authors:  Annika Hultén; Marijn van Vliet; Sasa Kivisaari; Lotta Lammi; Tiina Lindh-Knuutila; Ali Faisal; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.