Literature DB >> 27137151

A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.

Ryan M Kretzer1, Camilo Molina, Nianbin Hu, Hidemasa Umekoji, Ali A Baaj, Hassan Serhan, Bryan W Cunningham.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cadaveric biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the kinematic response of a stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody cage compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or pedicle screws after lateral discectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral interbody fusion is a promising minimally invasive fixation technique for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. The biomechanical stability of stand-alone cage placement compared with supplemental posterior fixation with either facet or bilateral pedicle screws remains unclear.
METHODS: A 6-degree of freedom spine simulator was used to test flexibility in 7 human cadaveric specimens. Flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and axial-rotation were tested in the intact condition, followed by destabilization through a lateral discectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5. Specimens were then reconstructed at both operative segments in the following sequence: (1) lateral interbody cage placement; (2) either Discovery facet screws or the Viper F2 system using a transfacet-pedicular trajectory randomized to L2-L3 or L4-L5; and (3) removal of facet screw fixation followed by placement of bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Acute range of motion (ROM) was quantified and analyzed.
RESULTS: All 4 reconstruction groups, including stand-alone interbody cage placement, bilateral Discovery facet screws, the Viper F2 system, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod stabilization, resulted in a significant decrease in acute ROM in all loading modes tested (P<0.05). There were no significant differences observed between the 4 instrumentation groups (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Viper F2 system resulted in greatest reduction of acute ROM in both flexion-extension and axial rotation versus all other treatments (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone interbody cage placement results in a significant reduction in acute ROM at the operative segment in the absence of posterior supplemental fixation. If added fixation is desired, facet screw placement, including the Viper F2 facet screw system using an integrated compression washer and transfacet-pedicular trajectory, provides similar acute stability to the spinal segment compared with traditional bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the setting of lateral interbody cage deployment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27137151     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182868ef9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  11 in total

1.  CT-Guided Transfacet Pedicle Screw Fixation in Facet Joint Syndrome: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Luigi Manfré
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Prospective evaluation of 1-year outcomes in single-level percutaneous lumbar transfacet screw fixation in the lateral decubitus position following lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jay W Rhee; Rory J Petteys; Amjad N Anaizi; Faheem A Sandhu; Jean-Marc Voyadzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Value of single-level circumferential fusion: a 10-year prospective outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis comparing posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Glenn Buttermann; Sarah Hollmann; John-Michael Arpino; Nicole Ferko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Thomas M Shea; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Non-union rate with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Robert Watkins; Robert Watkins; Robert Hanna
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability in TLIF, PLIF, and XLIF Applications.

Authors:  Edward K Nomoto; Guy R Fogel; Alexandre Rasouli; Justin V Bundy; Alexander W Turner
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-31

9.  Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation.

Authors:  Oujie Lai; Yunlin Chen; Qixin Chen; Yong Hu; Weihu Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A Retrospective Study of 39 Patients Treated With Anterior Approach of Thoracic and Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: Clinical Manifestations, Anterior Surgical Treatment, and Outcome.

Authors:  Can Yaldz; Nail Özdemir; Onur Yaman; Hamit Günes Feran; Tugrul Tansug; Mustafa Minoglu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.