Toshiki Kobayashi1, Michael S Orendurff2, Madeline L Singer3, Fan Gao4, Wayne K Daly2, K Bo Foreman3. 1. Orthocare Innovations, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA; Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Electronic address: kobayashi-t@hus.ac.jp. 2. Orthocare Innovations, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 4. Department of Health Care Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genu recurvatum (knee hyperextension) is a common issue for individuals post-stroke. Ankle-foot orthoses are used to improve genu recurvatum, but evidence is limited concerning their effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of changing the plantarflexion resistance of an articulated ankle-foot orthosis on genu recurvatum in patients post-stroke. METHODS: Gait analysis was performed on 6 individuals post-stroke with genu recurvatum using an articulated ankle-foot orthosis whose plantarflexion resistance was adjustable at four levels. Gait data were collected using a Bertec split-belt instrumented treadmill in a 3-dimensional motion analysis laboratory. Gait parameters were extracted and plotted for each subject under the four plantarflexion resistance conditions of the ankle-foot orthosis. Gait parameters included: a) peak ankle plantarflexion angle, b) peak ankle dorsiflexion moment, c) peak knee extension angle and d) peak knee flexion moment. A non-parametric Friedman test was performed followed by a post-hoc Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for statistical analyses. FINDINGS: All the gait parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences among the four resistance conditions of the AFO. Increasing the amount of plantarflexion resistance of the ankle-foot orthosis generally reduced genu recurvatum in all subjects. However, individual analyses showed that the responses to the changes in the plantarflexion resistance of the AFO were not necessarily linear, and appear unique to each subject. INTERPRETATIONS: The plantarflexion resistance of an articulated AFO should be adjusted to improve genu recurvatum in patients post-stroke. Future studies should investigate what clinical factors would influence the individual differences.
BACKGROUND: Genu recurvatum (knee hyperextension) is a common issue for individuals post-stroke. Ankle-foot orthoses are used to improve genu recurvatum, but evidence is limited concerning their effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of changing the plantarflexion resistance of an articulated ankle-foot orthosis on genu recurvatum in patients post-stroke. METHODS: Gait analysis was performed on 6 individuals post-stroke with genu recurvatum using an articulated ankle-foot orthosis whose plantarflexion resistance was adjustable at four levels. Gait data were collected using a Bertec split-belt instrumented treadmill in a 3-dimensional motion analysis laboratory. Gait parameters were extracted and plotted for each subject under the four plantarflexion resistance conditions of the ankle-foot orthosis. Gait parameters included: a) peak ankle plantarflexion angle, b) peak ankle dorsiflexion moment, c) peak knee extension angle and d) peak knee flexion moment. A non-parametric Friedman test was performed followed by a post-hoc Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for statistical analyses. FINDINGS: All the gait parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences among the four resistance conditions of the AFO. Increasing the amount of plantarflexion resistance of the ankle-foot orthosis generally reduced genu recurvatum in all subjects. However, individual analyses showed that the responses to the changes in the plantarflexion resistance of the AFO were not necessarily linear, and appear unique to each subject. INTERPRETATIONS: The plantarflexion resistance of an articulated AFO should be adjusted to improve genu recurvatum in patients post-stroke. Future studies should investigate what clinical factors would influence the individual differences.
Authors: Allison Cooper; Ghalib Abdulllah Alghamdi; Mohammed Abdulrahman Alghamdi; Abdulrahman Altowaijri; Susan Richardson Journal: Physiother Res Int Date: 2011-12-07
Authors: Kavi C Jagadamma; Elaine Owen; Fiona J Coutts; Janet Herman; Jacqueline Yirrell; Thomas H Mercer; Mariëtta L Van Der Linden Journal: Prosthet Orthot Int Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Toshiki Kobayashi; Madeline L Singer; Michael S Orendurff; Fan Gao; Wayne K Daly; K Bo Foreman Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: J Boudarham; R Zory; F Genet; G Vigné; D Bensmail; N Roche; D Pradon Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Toshiki Kobayashi; Michael S Orendurff; Grace Hunt; Fan Gao; Nicholas LeCursi; Lucas S Lincoln; K Bo Foreman Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Toshiki Kobayashi; Michael S Orendurff; Grace Hunt; Lucas S Lincoln; Fan Gao; Nicholas LeCursi; K Bo Foreman Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Andrew J Meyer; Ilan Eskinazi; Jennifer N Jackson; Anil V Rao; Carolynn Patten; Benjamin J Fregly Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2016-10-13