Literature DB >> 27129784

Accuracy and repeatability of quantitative fluoroscopy for the measurement of sagittal plane translation and finite centre of rotation in the lumbar spine.

Alexander Breen1, Alan Breen2.   

Abstract

Quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) was developed to measure intervertebral mechanics in vivo and has been found to have high repeatability and accuracy for the measurement of intervertebral rotations. However, sagittal plane translation and finite centre of rotation (FCR) are potential measures of stability but have not yet been fully validated for current QF. This study investigated the repeatability and accuracy of QF for measuring these variables. Repeatability was assessed from L2-S1 in 20 human volunteers. Accuracy was investigated using 10 consecutive measurements from each of two pairs of linked and instrumented dry human vertebrae as reference; one which tilted without translation and one which translated without tilt. The results found intra- and inter-observer repeatability for translation to be 1.1mm or less (SEM) with fair to substantial reliability (ICC 0.533-0.998). Intra-observer repeatability of FCR location for inter-vertebral rotations of 5° and above ranged from 1.5mm to 1.8mm (SEM) with moderate to substantial reliability (ICC 0.626-0.988). Inter-observer repeatability for FCR ranged from 1.2mm to 5.7mm, also with moderate to substantial reliability (ICC 0.621-0.878). Reliability was substantial (ICC>0.81) for 10/16 measures for translation and 5/8 for FCR location. Accuracy for translation was 0.1mm (fixed centre) and 2.2mm (moveable centre), with an FCR error of 0.3mm(x) and 0.4mm(y) (fixed centre). This technology was found to have a high level of accuracy and with a few exceptions, moderate to substantial repeatability for the measurement of translation and FCR from fluoroscopic motion sequences.
Copyright © 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flouroscopy; Image processing; Lumbar; Spine kinematics; Vertebral motion analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129784     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anti-directional cervical intervertebral motion: could it have gone any other way?

Authors:  Alan Breen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

3.  Aberrant intervertebral motion in patients with treatment-resistant nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A model-based approach for estimation of changes in lumbar segmental kinematics associated with alterations in trunk muscle forces.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Navid Arjmand; Judith R Meakin; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Comparison of intra subject repeatability of quantitative fluoroscopy and static radiography in the measurement of lumbar intervertebral flexion translation.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Emilie Claerbout; Rebecca Hemming; Ravi Ayer; Alan Breen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Investigator analytic repeatability of two new intervertebral motion biomarkers for chronic, nonspecific low back pain in a cohort of healthy controls.

Authors:  Daphne To; Alexander Breen; Alan Breen; Silvano Mior; Samuel J Howarth
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-11-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.