| Literature DB >> 27129722 |
Cristina Menni1, Marie Migaud2, Craig A Glastonbury1, Michelle Beaumont1, Aikaterini Nikolaou1, Kerrin S Small1, Mary Julia Brosnan3, Robert P Mohney4, Tim D Spector1, Ana M Valdes1,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether metabolomic markers of T2D and blood pressure (BP) act on these traits via visceral fat (VF) mass.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27129722 PMCID: PMC4914926 DOI: 10.1002/oby.21488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) ISSN: 1930-7381 Impact factor: 5.002
Demographic characteristics of the study population
| Mean (SD) | VF Q1 | VF Q2 | VF Q3 | VF Q4 | Associated with VF mass, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 568. 2 (298.8) | 1.28‐332.7 | 332.8‐523.0 | 532.1‐753.4 | 753.5‐1,725 | ||
|
| 56.91 (11.57) | 50.86 (12.75) | 57.96 (11.33) | 58.84 (10.40) | 59.94 (9.313) | 5 × 10−59 |
|
|
| 26.30 (4.90) | 21.8 (2.20) | 24.4 (2.41) | 27.0 (3.08) | 31.7 (4.77) | 1 × 10−300 |
|
|
| 0.98 (0.71) | 0.56 (0.31) | 0.73 (0.48) | 0.99 (0.60) | 1.50 (0.86) | 3 × 10−28 |
|
|
| 93:1,145 (8.1%) | 8:297 (3%) | 18:277 (6%) | 9:254 (3%) | 58:217 (21%) | 0.000519 |
|
|
| 127.4 (16.4) | 119.4 (14.4) | 126.4 (15.6) | 130.2 (16.2) | 133.5 | 2.14 × 10−5 |
|
|
| 77.9 (9.6) | 74.1 (9.1) | 76.9 (9.1) | 79.1 (9.3) | 81.5 (9.6) | 1.97 × 10−9 |
|
|
| 21.9% | 13.4% | 18.5% | 21.8% | 33.7% | 0.014 |
|
|
| 2,401 | 600 | 601 | 600 | 600 | ||
|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
Data are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise specified.
P value for association between inverse normalized VF mass and continuous traits by linear or logistic regression adjusted for covariates.
Adjusted for BMI.
Adjusted for age.
Adjusted for age and BMI.
Super controls are individuals with fasting glucose <5 mmol/L.
VF Q, quartiles of the visceral fat mass distribution in 2,401 individuals from the TwinsUK cohort; HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin resistance T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 1Association of selected metabolites with (A) T2D, (B) visceral fat mass, and (C) homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). The metabolites are those previously reported to be associated with T2D with P < 0.0001. The odds ratio with T2D and the coefficients β and the 95% confidence intervals of the linear regression with visceral fat mass and log HOMA‐IR adjusted for covariates are shown for each metabolite. P values are ‡P < 0.0001, ¶0.0001 < P < 0.05, and n.s. P > 0.05.
Proportion of the association of metabolites with insulin resistance and blood pressure that is mediated by their association with VF mass
| Metabolite name | Trait | Metabolite | Metabolite | % Association through VF mass |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0126 | 0.0079 | 37.3 |
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0031 | 0.0012 | 61.3 |
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0162 | 0.0111 | 31.5 |
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0526 | 0.0424 | 19.4 |
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0073 | 0.0039 | 46.6 |
|
| HOMA‐IR | 0.0181 | 0.0118 | 34.8 |
|
| SBP | 0.01 | 0.0076 | 24.0 |
|
| SBP | 0.0041 | 0.0025 | 39.0 |
|
| SBP | 0.0033 | 0.0022 | 33.3 |
|
| SBP | 0.0119 | 0.0105 | 11.8 |
|
| SBP | 0.0035 | 0.0024 | 31.4 |
The proportion of the variance in HOMA‐IR or SBP explained by the metabolite after taking into account all covariates (age, sex, BMI, height, and metabolite batch).
The proportion of the variance in HOMA‐IR or SBP explained by the metabolite after taking into account the same covariates as in the first footnote and adjusting also for VF mass.
HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin resistance; VF, visceral fat; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle genes and VF and their association with VF and T2D metabolites
| VF | VF adj T2D, | T2D, | Metabolites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Enzyme encoded | Probe/position |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| Citrate synthase | ilmn_1757872 chr8:8213004:8213053 | −0.0003 (0.0001) | 1.32 × 10−4 | NS | NS | Valine (−0.02 [0.01]) |
|
| Soluble aconitase 1 | ilmn_1750800 chr9: 32440621:32440670 | −0.0002 (0.0001) | 1.53 × 10−5 | NS | NS |
3‐methyl‐2‐oxovalerate (−0.02 [0.01]) |
|
| Mitochondrial isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (NADP+) | ilmn_1751753chr15:88428516:88428565 | −0.0005 (0.0001) | 4.04 × 10−10 | NS | 0.03 |
3‐methyl‐2‐oxovalerate (−0.03 [0.01]) |
|
| Succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A | ilmn_1744210chr5: 289627:289676 | −0.0004 (0.0001) | 3.89 × 10−5 | NS | NS | None |
|
| Succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit C | chr1: 17221716:17221765 | −0.0004 (0.0001) | 1.54 × 10−8 | NS | NS | None |
|
| Succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit C | ilmn_1667257chr1: 159601077:159601126 | 0.0001 (0.0001) | 2.78 × 10−2 | NS | NS | None |
NS, not significant: P > 0.05.
VF, visceral fat; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 2Association of selected metabolites with (A) systolic blood pressure (SBP), (B) diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and (C) visceral fat mass. The metabolites are those previously reported to be associated with BP with P < 0.0001. The linear regression coefficients β and the 95% confidence intervals of the linear regression with the three traits adjusted for covariates are shown for each metabolite. P values are ‡P < 0.0001, ¶0.0001 < P < 0.05, and n.s. P > 0.05.
Metabolites independently associated with VF (P < 0.01 in backward linear regression) and their association with T2D, HOMA‐IR, and SBP
| Metabolite name | Subpathway | VF, | T2D, OR (SE) | HOMA‐IR, | SBP, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Alanine and aspartate metabolism | −0.07 (0.01) | 1.16 (0.15) | −0.06 (0.01) | 0.3 (−0.19 to 0.79) |
|
| Creatine metabolism | 0.08 (0.01) | 0.96 (0.12) | −0.03 (0.02) | −0.02 (−0.49 to 0.45) |
|
| Glutamate metabolism | 0.13 (0.01) | 1.37 (0.19) | 0.14 (0.02) | 0.41 (−0.09 to 0.91) |
|
| Glycine, serine, threonine metabolism | −0.08 (0.01) | 0.85 (0.12) | −0.1 (0.01) | 0.09 (−0.4 to 0.59) |
|
| Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism | −0.08 (0.01) | 0.97 (0.12) | 0.03 (0.01) | −1.04 (−1.53 to −0.55) |
|
| Valine, leucine, isoleucine metabolism | 0.05 (0.01) | 1.53 (0.21) | 0.05 (0.02) | 1.31 (0.83 to 1.78) |
|
| Glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism | −0.06 (0.01) | 0.95 (0.09) | −0.04 (0.01) | 0.86 (0.35 to 1.38) |
|
| Glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism | 0.08 (0.01) | 1.84 (0.24) | 0.15 (0.01) | 1.51 (0.99 to 2.02) |
|
| Tocopherol metabolism | 0.06 (0.01) | 0.93 (0.12) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.7 (0.22 to 1.17) |
|
| Bile acid metabolism | 0.06 (0.01) | 1.47 (0.19) | 0.06 (0.02) | |
|
| Carnitine metabolism | 0.07 (0.01) | 0.6 (0.08) | 0.03 (0.02) | 1.48 (1.01 to 1.96) |
|
| Lysolipid | 0.09 (0.01) | 1.06 (0.14) | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.61 (0.15 to 1.08) |
|
| Medium‐chain fatty acid | −0.07 (0.01) | 0.69 (0.08) | −0.03 (0.01) | 1.52 (1.04 to 2) |
|
| Sterol/steroid | 0.09 (0.01) | 1.28 (0.2) | 0.04 (0.02) | |
|
| Purine and urate metabolism | 0.11 (0.01) | 0.92 (0.13) | 0.1 (0.02) | 1.09 (0.57 to 1.6) |
|
| Dipeptide | 0.06 (0.02) | 1.16 (0.14) | 0.08 (0.02) | |
|
| γ‐glutamyl | 0.11 (0.01) | 1.41 (0.17) | 0.15 (0.02) | 0.45 (−0.04 to 0.94) |
|
| Polypeptide | 0.11 (0.01) | 1.28 (0.15) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.94 (0.48 to 1.4) |
|
| Benzoate metabolism | −0.07 (0.01) | 1.2 (0.15) | 0 (0.01) | −0.61 (−1.06 to −0.16) |
|
| Food component/plant | −0.06 (0.01) | 1.01 (0.12) | −0.03 (0.02) | −0.09 (−0.56 to 0.37) |
Data are presented as coefficient from linear regression (β) and standard error (SE) or as odds ratio (OR) and standard error.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.0001.
P < 1 × 10−8.
HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin resistance; VF, visceral fat; T2D, type 2 diabetes; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 3Venn diagram summarizing which metabolites are associated with visceral fat (VF), insulin resistance (IR), blood pressure (BP), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in this study.