A Nakhnikian1, S Ito2, L L Dwiel3, L M Grasse3, G V Rebec4, L N Lauridsen3, J M Beggs5. 1. Program in Neuroscience, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Cognitive Science Program, 1900 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Indiana University, Bloomington, United States. Electronic address: alexander_nakhnikian@hms.harvard.edu. 2. Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064, United States; University of California, Santa Cruz, United States. 3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Indiana University, Bloomington, United States. 4. Program in Neuroscience, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Indiana University, Bloomington, United States. 5. Program in Neuroscience, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Department of Physics, 727 E. 3rd St., Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) occurs when non-identical frequency components entrain one another. A ubiquitous example from neuroscience is low frequency phase to high frequency amplitude coupling in electrophysiological signals. Seminal work by Canolty revealed CFC in human ECoG data. Established methods band-pass the data into component frequencies then convert the band-passed signals into the analytic representation, from which we infer the instantaneous amplitude and phase of each component. Though powerful, such methods resolve signals with respect to time and frequency without addressing the multiresolution problem. NEW METHOD: We build upon the ground-breaking work of Canolty and others and derive a wavelet-based CFC detection algorithm that efficiently searches a range of frequencies using a sequence of filters with optimal trade-off between time and frequency resolution. We validate our method using simulated data and analyze CFC within and between the primary motor cortex and dorsal striatum of rats under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. RESULTS: Our method detects the correct CFC in simulated data and reveals CFC between frequency bands that were previously shown to participate in corticostriatal effective connectivity. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Other CFC detection methods address the need to increase bandwidth when analyzing high frequency components but none to date permit rigorous bandwidth selection with no a priori knowledge of underlying CFC. Our method is thus particularly useful for exploratory studies. CONCLUSIONS: The method developed here permits rigorous and efficient exploration of a hypothesis space and is particularly useful when the frequencies participating in CFC are unknown. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) occurs when non-identical frequency components entrain one another. A ubiquitous example from neuroscience is low frequency phase to high frequency amplitude coupling in electrophysiological signals. Seminal work by Canolty revealed CFC in human ECoG data. Established methods band-pass the data into component frequencies then convert the band-passed signals into the analytic representation, from which we infer the instantaneous amplitude and phase of each component. Though powerful, such methods resolve signals with respect to time and frequency without addressing the multiresolution problem. NEW METHOD: We build upon the ground-breaking work of Canolty and others and derive a wavelet-based CFC detection algorithm that efficiently searches a range of frequencies using a sequence of filters with optimal trade-off between time and frequency resolution. We validate our method using simulated data and analyze CFC within and between the primary motor cortex and dorsal striatum of rats under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. RESULTS: Our method detects the correct CFC in simulated data and reveals CFC between frequency bands that were previously shown to participate in corticostriatal effective connectivity. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Other CFC detection methods address the need to increase bandwidth when analyzing high frequency components but none to date permit rigorous bandwidth selection with no a priori knowledge of underlying CFC. Our method is thus particularly useful for exploratory studies. CONCLUSIONS: The method developed here permits rigorous and efficient exploration of a hypothesis space and is particularly useful when the frequencies participating in CFC are unknown. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anesthesia; Cross-frequency coupling; Generalized Morse wavelets; In vivo electrophysiology; Signal processing
Authors: R T Canolty; E Edwards; S S Dalal; M Soltani; S S Nagarajan; H E Kirsch; M S Berger; N M Barbaro; R T Knight Journal: Science Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Adriano B L Tort; Mark A Kramer; Catherine Thorn; Daniel J Gibson; Yasuo Kubota; Ann M Graybiel; Nancy J Kopell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexander Nakhnikian; George V Rebec; Leslie M Grasse; Lucas L Dwiel; Masanori Shimono; John M Beggs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kevin M Spencer; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Paul G Nestor; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Nicholas Murphy; Nithya Ramakrishnan; Christopher P Walker; Nicola R Polizzotto; Raymond Y Cho Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Etienne Combrisson; Timothy Nest; Andrea Brovelli; Robin A A Ince; Juan L P Soto; Aymeric Guillot; Karim Jerbi Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 4.475