BACKGROUND: Allergies to cashew are increasing in prevalence, with clinical symptoms ranging from oral pruritus to fatal anaphylactic reaction. Yet, cashew-specific T cell epitopes and T cell cross-reactivity amongst cashew and other tree nut allergens in humans remain uncharacterized. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we characterized cashew-specific T cell responses in cashew-allergic subjects and examined cross-reactivity of these cashew-specific cells towards other tree nut allergens. METHODS: CD154 up-regulation assay was used to determine immunodominance hierarchy among cashew major allergens at the T cell level. The phenotype, magnitude and functionality of cashew-specific T cells were determined by utilizing ex vivo staining with MHC class II tetramers. Dual tetramer staining and proliferation experiments were used to determine cross-reactivity to other tree nuts. RESULTS: CD4(+) T cell responses were directed towards cashew allergens Ana o 1 and Ana o 2. Multiple Ana o 1 and Ana o 2 T cell epitopes were then identified. These epitopes elicited either TH 2 or TH 2/TH 17 responses in allergic subjects, which were either cashew unique epitope or cross-reactive epitopes. For clones that recognized the cross-reactive epitope, T cell clones responded robustly to cashew, hazelnut and/or pistachio but not to walnut. CONCLUSIONS: Phylogenetically diverse tree nut allergens can activate cashew-reactive T cells and elicit a TH 2-type response at an epitope-specific level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lack of cross-reactivity between walnut and cashew suggests that cashew peptide immunotherapy approach may not be most effective for walnut.
BACKGROUND:Allergies to cashew are increasing in prevalence, with clinical symptoms ranging from oral pruritus to fatal anaphylactic reaction. Yet, cashew-specific T cell epitopes and T cell cross-reactivity amongst cashew and other tree nut allergens in humans remain uncharacterized. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we characterized cashew-specific T cell responses in cashew-allergic subjects and examined cross-reactivity of these cashew-specific cells towards other tree nut allergens. METHODS: CD154 up-regulation assay was used to determine immunodominance hierarchy among cashew major allergens at the T cell level. The phenotype, magnitude and functionality of cashew-specific T cells were determined by utilizing ex vivo staining with MHC class II tetramers. Dual tetramer staining and proliferation experiments were used to determine cross-reactivity to other tree nuts. RESULTS:CD4(+) T cell responses were directed towards cashew allergens Ana o 1 and Ana o 2. Multiple Ana o 1 and Ana o 2 T cell epitopes were then identified. These epitopes elicited either TH 2 or TH 2/TH 17 responses in allergic subjects, which were either cashew unique epitope or cross-reactive epitopes. For clones that recognized the cross-reactive epitope, T cell clones responded robustly to cashew, hazelnut and/or pistachio but not to walnut. CONCLUSIONS: Phylogenetically diverse tree nut allergens can activate cashew-reactive T cells and elicit a TH 2-type response at an epitope-specific level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lack of cross-reactivity between walnut and cashew suggests that cashew peptide immunotherapy approach may not be most effective for walnut.
Authors: W W Kwok; A W Liu; E J Novak; J A Gebe; R A Ettinger; G T Nepom; S N Reymond; D M Koelle Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-04-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: L N Willison; P Tawde; J M Robotham; R M Penney; S S Teuber; S K Sathe; K H Roux Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2008-05-13 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Luis Diego Archila; David Jeong; Mariona Pascal; Joan Bartra; Manel Juan; David Robinson; Mary L Farrington; William W Kwok Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: John D Campbell; Karen F Buckland; Sarah J McMillan; Jennifer Kearley; William L G Oldfield; Lawrence J Stern; Hans Grönlund; Marianne van Hage; Catherine J Reynolds; Rosemary J Boyton; Stephen P Cobbold; A Barry Kay; Daniel M Altmann; Clare M Lloyd; Mark Larché Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Shanna Bastiaan-Net; Marit Reitsma; Jan H G Cordewener; Johanna P M van der Valk; Twan A H P America; Anthony E J Dubois; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Huub F J Savelkoul; Nicolette W de Jong; Harry J Wichers Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: Amedee Renand; Marry Farrington; Elizabeth Whalen; Erik Wambre; Veronique Bajzik; Sharon Chinthrajah; Kari C Nadeau; William W Kwok Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Sandip D Kamath; Sandra Scheiblhofer; Christopher M Johnson; Yoan Machado; Thomas McLean; Aya C Taki; Paul A Ramsland; Swati Iyer; Isabella Joubert; Heidi Hofer; Michael Wallner; Josef Thalhamer; Jennifer Rolland; Robyn O'Hehir; Peter Briza; Fatima Ferreira; Richard Weiss; Andreas L Lopata Journal: Allergy Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Nanna Juel-Berg; Lau Fabricius Larsen; Niels Küchen; Ida Norgil; Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen; Lars K Poulsen Journal: Front Allergy Date: 2022-03-28
Authors: Neal P Smith; Bert Ruiter; Yamini V Virkud; Ang A Tu; Brinda Monian; James J Moon; J Christopher Love; Wayne G Shreffler Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2021-07-08