Literature DB >> 27129137

Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.

Ken Kamata1, Masayuki Kitano1, Satoru Yasukawa2, Masatoshi Kudo1, Yasutaka Chiba3, Takeshi Ogura4, Kazuhide Higuchi4, Nobuyasu Fukutake5, Reiko Ashida5, Tomoaki Yamasaki6, Hiroko Nebiki6, Satoru Hirose7, Noriyuki Hoki7, Masanori Asada8, Shujiro Yazumi8, Makoto Takaoka9, Kazuichi Okazaki9, Fumihiro Matsuda10, Yoshihiro Okabe10, Akio Yanagisawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with 25-gauge needles yields small volume samples that are mainly processed for cytology. Using 25-gauge needles with a core trap may overcome this limitation. This trial compared 25-gauge needles with and without a core trap in terms of their ability to obtain histologic samples from solid pancreatic masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses who presented to eight Japanese referral centers for EUS-FNA in April - September 2013 were randomized to undergo sampling with a 25-gauge needle with a core trap (ProCore) or a standard 25-gauge needle. Tissue samples were fixed in formalin and processed for histologic evaluation. For the purpose of this study only samples obtained with the first needle pass were used for comparison of: (i) accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy, (ii) rate of samples with preserved tissue architecture adequate for histologic evaluation, and (iii) sample cellularity.
RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were enrolled. Compared to the first pass with a standard needle (n = 108), the first pass with the ProCore needle (n = 106) provided samples that were more often adequate for histologic evaluation (81.1 % vs. 69.4 %; P = 0.048) and had superior cellularity (rich/moderate/poor, 36 %/27 %/37 % vs. 19 %/26 %/55 %; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between the two needles in sensitivity (75.6 % vs. 69.0 %, P = 0.337) and accuracy (79.2 % vs. 75.9 %, P = 0.561) for the diagnosis of malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with solid pancreatic masses, a 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle with a core trap provides histologic samples of better quality than a standard 25-gauge needle. There was no difference in accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy between the needles. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: UMIN000010021. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129137     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

1.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using 22-Gauge Franseen Needle for the Histological Diagnosis of Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Naoki Mita; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Yuhei Iwasa; Katsuhisa Toda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Ichiro Yasuda; Masahito Shimizu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Bile duct angulation and tumor vascularity are useful radiographic features for differentiating pancreatic head cancer and intrapancreatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Kohga; Yusuke Yamamoto; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Ryo Ashida; Takeshi Aramaki; Keiko Sasaki; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Yukitaka Yamashita; Hiroko Akamatsu; Maiko Ikenouchi; Tatsuya Ishii; Hisakazu Matsumoto; Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Yasuki Nakatani; Keiichi Hatamaru; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Akamatsu; Yoshito Uenoyama; Tomohiro Watanabe; Kazuo Ono; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

5.  Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Nobu Nishioka; Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Miyuki Imanishi; Saori Onda; Wataru Takagi; Tatsushi Sano; Atsushi Okuda; Akira Miyano; Mio Amano; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy in sampling pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Shulei Zhao; Yong Chen; Ruzhen Jia; Xiaohua Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Collaboration of community hospital endosonographers improves diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Lydi M J W van Driel; Pieter Honkoop; Mohamad Hadithi; Marie-Paule Anten; Frank Smedts; Margreet C Kerkmeer; Bart J Veldt; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 8.  Endoscopic Ultrasound for Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Takeichi Yoshida; Yasunobu Yamashita; Masayuki Kitano
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-24

9.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  EUS-guided tissue acquisition in chronic pancreatitis: Differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and pseudotumoral masses using EUS-FNA or core biopsy.

Authors:  Roberto Grassia; Nicola Imperatore; Pietro Capone; Fabrizio Cereatti; Edoardo Forti; Filippo Antonini; Giulia Paola Tanzi; Mario Martinotti; Federico Buffoli; Massimiliano Mutignani; Giampiero Macarri; Gianpiero Manes; Maurizio Vecchi; Germana De Nucci
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.