| Literature DB >> 27129137 |
Ken Kamata1, Masayuki Kitano1, Satoru Yasukawa2, Masatoshi Kudo1, Yasutaka Chiba3, Takeshi Ogura4, Kazuhide Higuchi4, Nobuyasu Fukutake5, Reiko Ashida5, Tomoaki Yamasaki6, Hiroko Nebiki6, Satoru Hirose7, Noriyuki Hoki7, Masanori Asada8, Shujiro Yazumi8, Makoto Takaoka9, Kazuichi Okazaki9, Fumihiro Matsuda10, Yoshihiro Okabe10, Akio Yanagisawa2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with 25-gauge needles yields small volume samples that are mainly processed for cytology. Using 25-gauge needles with a core trap may overcome this limitation. This trial compared 25-gauge needles with and without a core trap in terms of their ability to obtain histologic samples from solid pancreatic masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses who presented to eight Japanese referral centers for EUS-FNA in April - September 2013 were randomized to undergo sampling with a 25-gauge needle with a core trap (ProCore) or a standard 25-gauge needle. Tissue samples were fixed in formalin and processed for histologic evaluation. For the purpose of this study only samples obtained with the first needle pass were used for comparison of: (i) accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy, (ii) rate of samples with preserved tissue architecture adequate for histologic evaluation, and (iii) sample cellularity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27129137 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN: 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093