| Literature DB >> 27127789 |
Dong Hyun Kim1, Dong Ju Hyun2, Raymonde Piquette3, Clément Beaumont3, Lucie Germain4, Danielle Larouche4.
Abstract
As surgical and/or ablative modalities, radiofrequency (RF) has been known to produce good clinical outcomes in dermatology. Recently, 27.12 MHz RF has been introduced and has several advantages over conventional 4 or 6 MHz in terms of the precise ablation and lesser pain perception. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 27.12 MHz RF for the treatment of benign cutaneous lesions. Twenty female patient subjects were enrolled. Digital photography and a USB microscope camera were used to monitor the clinical results before one session of treatment with 27.12 MHz RF and after 1 and 3 weeks. Treated lesions included telangiectasias, cherry and spider angiomas, skin tags, seborrheic keratoses, lentigo, milium, dilated pore, acne, piercing hole, and one case of neurofibroma. For vascular lesions, clinical results were excellent for 33.3%, good for 44.4%, moderate for 11.1%, and poor for 11.1%. For nonvascular lesions (epidermal lesions and other benign cutaneous lesions), clinical results were excellent for 48.3%, good for 45.2%, moderate for 3.2%, and poor for 3.2%. No serious adverse events were observed. Mild adverse events reported were slight erythema, scale, and crust. The 27.12 MHz RF treatment of benign vascular and nonvascular lesions appears safe and effective after 3 weeks of follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27127789 PMCID: PMC4835659 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6016943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Characteristics of patients and treated lesions.
| Characteristics | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 10–29 | 2 | 10 |
| 30–49 | 7 | 35 |
| >50 | 11 | 55 |
| Skin type | ||
| II | 1 | 5 |
| III | 18 | 90 |
| IV | 1 | 5 |
| Type of lesion | ||
| Vascular lesion | ||
| Telangiectasia | 22 | 32.8 |
| Cherry angioma | 14 | 20.8 |
| Spider angioma | 1 | 1.5 |
| Epidermal lesion | ||
| Skin tag | 13 | 19.4 |
| Seborrheic keratosis | 8 | 11.9 |
| Lentigo | 1 | 1.5 |
| Miscellaneous | ||
| Milium | 2 | 3.0 |
| Dilated pore | 3 | 4.5 |
| Acne | 2 | 3.0 |
| Piercing hole | 1 | 1.5 |
| Neurofibroma | 1 | 1.5 |
| Location of lesion | ||
| Face & neck | ||
| Periocular area | 3 | 4.5 |
| Nose | 12 | 17.9 |
| Others | 24 | 35.8 |
| Torso | ||
| Back | 5 | 7.5 |
| Chest | 8 | 11.9 |
| Abdomen | 7 | 10.4 |
| Axilla | 3 | 4.5 |
| Extremities | ||
| Upper extremities | 1 | 1.5 |
| Lower extremities | 5 | 7.5 |
Clinical improvement and adverse events in response to 27.12 MHz radiofrequency.
| Clinical improvement | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of lesion | Number of cases | Objective improvement | Overall satisfaction | ||||
| Excellent | Good | Moderate | Poor | Very satisfied | Satisfied | ||
| Vascular lesion | |||||||
| Telangiectasia | 22 | 3 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 2 |
| Cherry angioma | 13 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Spider angioma | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Epidermal lesion | |||||||
| Skin tag | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Seborrheic keratosis | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Lentigo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Miscellaneous (dilated pore, milium, neurofibroma, acne, and piercing hole) | 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Type of lesion | Adverse events | Pain | |||||
| Serious | Mild | Mean VAS score | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Vascular lesion | |||||||
| Telangiectasia | None | 10 (45.5%) | 3.16 | ||||
| Cherry angioma | None | 9 (69.2%) | 3.27 | ||||
| Spider angioma | None | None | 0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Epidermal lesion | |||||||
| Skin tag | None | 7 (53.8%) | 4 | ||||
| Seborrheic keratosis | None | 7 (87.5%) | 4.19 | ||||
| Lentigo | None | 1 (100%) | 3 | ||||
| Miscellaneous (dilated pore, milium, neurofibroma, acne, and piercing hole) | None | 4 (44.4%) | 3.78 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Clinical evaluation was performed by a dermatologist. Clinical results were assessed by physical examination, photographic follow-up, and USB microscope (M2, Scalar Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The results were described as excellent (complete reduction); good (more than 75% reduction), moderate (more than 50% reduction), and poor (less than 50% reduction). VAS: 10 cm visual analog scales. Adverse events reported were slight erythema, scale, and crust.
Figure 1Representative photographs of vascular lesions treated with radiofrequency. Cherry angioma on the forehead at baseline (a) and the end of treatment (b). Cherry angioma on the abdomen at baseline (c) and the end of treatment (d). Skin tag on the axilla at baseline (e) and the end of treatment (f). Seborrheic keratosis on the anterior chest at baseline (g) and the end of treatment (h). Insert: appearance of the lesion under USB microscope.