| Literature DB >> 27127784 |
Qi-Qi Zheng1, Zhan-Hui Zhang2, Han-Shi Zeng1, Wei-Xia Lin1, Heng-Wen Yang3, Zhi-Nan Yin3, Yuan-Zong Song1.
Abstract
Background. Neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) is a Mendelian disorder arising from biallelic SLC25A13 mutations, and SLC25A13 genetic analysis was indispensable for its definite diagnosis. However, conventional SLC25A13 analysis could not detect all mutations, especially obscure large insertions/deletions. This paper aimed to explore the obscure SLC25A13 mutation in an NICCD infant. Methods. Genomic DNA was extracted to screen for 4 high-frequency SLC25A13 mutations, and then all 18 exons and their flanking sequences were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Subsequently, cDNA cloning, SNP analyses, and semiquantitative PCR were performed to identify the obscure mutation. Results. A maternally inherited mutation IVS16ins3kb was screened out, and then cDNA cloning unveiled paternally inherited alternative splicing variants (ASVs) featuring exon 5 skipping. Ultimately, a large deletion c.329-1687_c.468+3865del5692bp, which has never been described in any other references, was identified via intensive study on the genomic DNA around exon 5 of SLC25A13 gene. Conclusions. An NICCD patient was definitely diagnosed as a compound heterozygote of IVS16ins3kb and c.329-1687_c.468+3865del5692bp. The large deletion enriched the SLC25A13 mutation spectrum, and its identification supported the concept that cDNA cloning analysis, along with other molecular tools such as semiquantitative PCR, could provide valuable clues, facilitating the identification of obscure SLC25A13 deletions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27127784 PMCID: PMC4835617 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4124263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Semiquantitative PCR in positioning analysis of the novel large deletion. Figure 1① was a representative electrophoresis of the semiquantitative PCR products. Compared with the mother (M1), the patient (P1) and the father (F1) had less signal intensity of the PCR products when using primer Set 1, while this is not the case when using primer Set 2; note that the signal intensity of the PCR products in the patient (P2) and the father (F2) was similar to that in the mother (M2). Figure 1② depicted the positions of the primer Sets 1 and 2. The primer sequences in Set 1 were 5′-GAGCTTCTTAGAAACCACCATGTGG-3′ (IVS5S5) and 5′-TCCAATGAGG AAGAAGACTACAGGAAG-3′ (IVS5A6), while in Set 2, 5′-TTTATGCACTGGGGCAACATG-3′ (IVS 1NF) and 5′-TGCCGGGCTGACACTTTGG-3′ (IVS 2NB), respectively. The results suggested that the patient (P) and the father (F) might harbor an obscure large deletion around the primer Set 1 but not Set 2.
Biochemical changes over time in the NICCD infant.
| Biochemical indices | 2.0M | 2.3M | 2.4M | 2.5M | 2.6M | 2.8M | 3.0M | 3.7Ma | 4.8M | 8.8M | 17.7M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (5–40 U/L) | 46.00 | 29.80 | 40.39 | 34.48 | 33.00 | 30.00 | 19.23 | 20.00 | 174.00 | 63.00 | 27.00 |
| AST (5–40 U/L) | 83.00 | 127.50 | 116.92 | 73.47 | 72.00 | 62.00 | 45.02 | 37.00 | 172.00 | 54.00 | 30.00 |
| GGT (8–50 U/L) | — | — | 131.13 | 139.63 | 183.00 | 185.00 | 475.33 | 211.00 | 109.00 | 54.00 | 26.00 |
| ALP (20–500 U/L) | — | — | 246.65 | 205.63 | 259.00 | 201.00 | 269.91 | 385.00 | 418.00 | 243.00 | 251.00 |
| TP (60.0–83.0 g/L) | 33.90 | 66.20 | 67.53 | 66.32 | 62.80 | 63.70 | 65.39 | 54.40 | 61.70 | 66.00 | 62.80 |
| Alb (35.0–55.0 g/L) | 21.30 | 36.94 | 39.66 | 39.23 | 35.00 | 37.60 | 40.87 | 37.50 | 41.80 | 45.80 | 43.80 |
| Glb (20.0–30.0 g/L) | — | 29.26 | 27.87 | 27.09 | 27.80 | 26.10 | 24.52 | 16.90 | 19.90 | 20.20 | 19.00 |
| Tbil (2–19 | 178.60 | 163.09 | 172.99 | 92.56 | 56.50 | 60.90 | 63.61 | 38.40 | 44.70 | 3.20 | 6.20 |
| Dbil (0–6 | 70.70 | 66.76 | 79.86 | 48.95 | 35.10 | 31.90 | 35.04 | 31.00 | 36.30 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Ibil (2.56–20.9 | 107.9 | 96.33 | 93.13 | 43.61 | 21.40 | 29.00 | 28.57 | 7.40 | 8.40 | 2.20 | 4.20 |
| TBA (0–10 | — | 33.86 | 39.35 | 54.43 | — | 73.50 | 44.45 | 173.60 | 169.7 | 11.30 | 8.80 |
| AFP(0–12 ng/mL) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10709.20 | 887.20 | — | 1.90 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; Glb, globulin; Tbil, total bilirubin; Dbil, direct bilirubin; Ibil, indirect bilirubin; TBA, total bile acid; AFP, alpha-feto protein. M, months of age. —, not tested. aWhen the breast milk feeding was stopped while a galactose-free and MCT-enriched therapeutic formula was introduced.
The SLC25A13 ASVs detected by cDNA analysis in the NICCD patient.
| Clones | Alternative splicing variants (ASVs) | Annotations |
|---|---|---|
| C0282-1 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-2 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-3 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-4 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-5 |
| Exons 4, 5, 7, and 8 skipping |
| C0282-6 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-7 |
| Exon 5 skipping |
| C0282-8 |
| Exons 4, 5, and 8 skipping |
| C0282-9 |
| Exon 5 skipping |
| C0282-10 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-11 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-12 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-13 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-14 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-15 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-16 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-17 |
| Exons 4, 5, and 8 skipping |
| C0282-18 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-19 |
| Exons 3, 4, and 5 skipping |
| C0282-20 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-21 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-22 |
| Exons 4, 5, and 8 skipping |
| C0282-23 |
| Exons 4, 5, and 8 skipping |
| C0282-24 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-25 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
| C0282-26 |
| Exons 4 and 5 skipping |
The ASVs in this table were described according to the nomenclature guidelines [26, 27]; nucleotide numbering was based on cDNA sequence (GenBank: NM_014251), with +1 indicating the A of the ATG-translation initiation codon.
SLC25A13 ASVs harboring r.329_468del in the patient C0282 and 8 healthy volunteers.
| Subjects |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| With | Without | |||
| C0282 | 26 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 129.2 | <0.01 |
| Volunteers | 1 (0.9%) | 115 (99.1%) | ||
Correction for continuity was performed for χ 2 calculation in this table.
Figure 2The large deletion mutation in SLC25A13 gene of the infant and his father. Figure 2① depicted the positions of the primer Set 3 and the novel large deletion. The primer sequences were 5′-AAGATTGTTGTTTATGGTGAGAC-3′ for IVS4S3 and 5′-ATGGTTTGCCCGACATGAGTAATC-3′ for J5.6KbDelR1, respectively. In Figure 2②, LA-PCR with the primer Set 3 revealed that the patient (P) and his father (F), but not the mother (M), had an unexpected band of 632 bp in size besides the normal product of 6324 bp. Figure 2③ was a segmental sequencing result of the unexpected PCR product. The arrow indicated the breakpoint arising from the large deletion.