Laura Hernandez-Folgado1, Juan Decara2, Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca2, Pilar Goya1, Nadine Jagerovic1. 1. Instituto de Química Médica, CSIC, Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain. 2. Centros de Investigación en Red (CIBER) Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, CB06/03, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Unidad Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Abstract
In a previous study, we have identified 3-alkyl-1,5-diaryl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles to be a novel class of cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists. In order to expand the number of cannabinoid ligands with a central 1,2,4-triazole scaffold, we have synthesized a novel series of 1-benzyl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles, and some of them were evaluated by CB1R radioligand binding assays. Compound 12a showed the most interesting pharmacological properties, possessing a CB1R affinity in the nanomolar range.
In a previous study, we have identified 3-alkyl-1,5-diaryl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles to be a novel class of cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists. In order to expand the number of cannabinoid ligands with a central 1,2,4-triazole scaffold, we have synthesized a novel series of 1-benzyl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles, and some of them were evaluated by CB1R radioligand binding assays. Compound 12a showed the most interesting pharmacological properties, possessing a CB1R affinity in the nanomolar range.
Due to the potential therapeutic effects of cannabinoids that include antiemetic, analgesic, antiglaucoma, obesity treatment, alcoholism, bronchodilatation, and inflammation, a considerable number of cannabinoid ligands have been reported in recent years [1]. Their effects are mediated through G-protein coupled cannabinoid receptors, which are part of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) [2]. So far, two types of cannabinoid receptors, designated as CB1R and CB2R, have been well characterized, and three putative cannabinoid receptors, GPR55, GPR18, and GPR119, have been also proposed [3]. CB1R has been found in the peripheral and central nervous system, and CB2R is mainly present in the immune system. Cannabinoid ligands belong to families of diverse structural classes such as eicosanoids, classical and nonclassical ligands related to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and heterocycles. Among the heterocycles family, pyrazoles [4] and aminoalkylindoles [5] are the most representative ligands.In our early research program, it was found that triazole motif was an attractive scaffold for cannabinoid activity [6]. We reported that the CB1R antagonist 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-hexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole (LH21) exhibited antiobesity activity in in vivo assays (Figure 1) [7-9]. Pyrazole [10] and pyrrole [11] cannabinoid ligands bearing a benzyl substituent on position N1 have been reported in the literature as CB2R antagonists (Figure 1). This prompted us to extend our previous investigation by synthesizing a series of 3-alkyl-5-aryl-1-benzyl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles in order to establish structure-activity relationships.
Figure 1
Structure of the CB1R antagonist LH21 and the CB2R antagonists SR144528 and N-(1S,2R)-myrtanyl-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(-4-methylbenzyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxamide.
We describe herein the synthesis of new benzyl-1,2,4-triazoles [12] and present initial results from radioligand binding assays as part of our investigation on cannabinoid active compounds.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemistry
2.1.1. General
All reagents and solvents were used as commercially received. EtOH was dried over magnesium. TLC was carried out by precoated silica-gel 60 F254 plates (Merck) and detection by UV light (254 nm). Flash-column chromatography was carried out by Kieselgel 60 (230–400 mesh; Merck). Medium pressure chromatography (MPLC) was carried out by Flash Master Personal system with prepacked silica-gel cartridges. The purity of the final compounds was determined by elemental analysis or analytical HPLC. Elemental analysis was performed on a Heraeus CHN-O rapid analyzer. Analyses indicated by the symbols of the elements or functions were within ±0.4% of the theoretical values, except compound 6. Analytical HPLC was run on a Waters 6000 with Delta Pak C 18.5 mm, 300 Ǻ (3.9 × 150 mm) column, using an eluent Acetonitrile/H2O (0.05% H3PO4 + 0.04% TEA) in the proportion indicated in each case; flow rate used was 1 mL/min and the UV absorption was detected at a wavelength of 254 nm. HPLC analyses were within ≥90% of purity, except compound 11b (81% purity). The mass spectra (electrospray positive mode) were determined on a MSD-Series 1100 Hewlett Packard instrument. Melting points (uncorrected) were determined with a Reichert Jung Thermovar apparatus. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Gemini 200, Varian 300 and 400 unity spectrometers using TMS as the internal standard. All chemical shifts are reported in ppm. For the assignment of the protons and carbons of the aromatic rings Scheme 1 is used.
Scheme 1
2.1.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 1 and 2
To a suspension of the corresponding nitrile (10 equiv) in dry EtOH (30–75 mL) NaOMe (1 equiv) was added. It was stirred at room temperature under N2 atmosphere for 48 h. Afterwards, ammonium chloride (10 equiv) was added, and the stirring was maintained for 24 more hours. Then, unreacted ammonium chloride was filtered off and the solvent was evaporated from the liquid layer. The white solid obtained was washed with Et2O, dried, and used in the next step without further purification.4-Chlorobenzimidamide Hydrochloride (
). Compound 1 was prepared from 4-chlorobenzonitrile (10.00 g, 72.7 mmol), NaOMe (393 mg, 7.3 mmol), and ammonium chloride (3.90 g, 72.7 mmol). Yield: 4.34 g of 1 (31%) as a white solid. Mp = 246-247°C (236–240°C (EtOH)). [13] 1H-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 8.02 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, Ho); 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, Hm). 13C-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 167.6 C=NH; 141.4 Cp; 130.8 and 130.7 Co and Cm; 128.2 Cipso. MS (ES+) m/z: 155 (100%) [M+H]+.4-Amidinopyridinium Hydrochloride (
). Compound 2 was prepared from 4-cyanopyridine (2.50 g, 24.0 mmol), NaOMe (130 mg, 2.4 mmol), and ammonium chloride (1.28 g, 24.0 mmol). Yield: 3.30 g of 2 (87%) as a white solid. Mp = 248-249°C. 1H-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 8.93 (d, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz, Hm); 7.87 (d, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz, Ho). 13C-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 166.9 C=NH; 151.7 Cm; 138.1 Cipso; 123.2 Co. MS (ES+) m/z: 122 (100%) [M+H]+.
2.1.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3–5
To a solution of the corresponding amidinium salt (1.5 equiv) in dry EtOH (10–45 mL), NaOMe (1 equiv) in 10 mL of dry EtOH was added. The suspension was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Then, the solid formed was filtered on Celite. Octanoic hydrazide (2 equiv) was added to the liquid layer and the mixture was stirred under reflux for 46–49 h. After cooling the reaction mixture, solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and washed with water (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The obtained residue was purified by MPLC using cyclohexane/EtOAc (3 : 1) as eluent, except for compound 5 where cyclohexane/EtOAc (3 : 1 to 4 : 1) was used.3-Heptyl-5-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole (
). Compound 3 was prepared from benzamidine hydrochloride hydrate (857 mg, 5.5 mmol), octanoic hydrazide (581 mg, 3.6 mmol), and NaOMe (394 mg, 7.3 mmol). Yield: 683 mg of 3 (78%) as a transparent oil. Mp = 129–132°C oxalate (to a solution of the free base in Et2O, a solution of oxalic acid in EtOAc was added; the white solid was filtered off, washed with EtOAc, and dried). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 10.65 (bs, 1H, NH); 7.96 (m, 2H, Ho); 7.34 (m, 3H, Hm and Hp); 2.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.65 (p, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.16 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.79 (bt, 3H, J = 6.3 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 160.4 and 160.0 C3 and C5; 129.8 Cipso; 129.5 Cp; 128.6 Cm; 126.4 Co; 31.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 29.1 CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.8 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.1 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 27.0 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 13.9 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 244 (100%) [M+H]+. Anal (C15H21N3·C2H2O4) % calculated (% found) C: 61.25 (61.41); H: 6.95 (7.12); N: 12.60 (12.62).5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole (
). Compound 4 was prepared from 1 (1.00 g, 5.2 mmol), octanoic hydrazide (549 mg, 3.5 mmol), and NaOMe (375 mg, 7.0 mmol). Yield 392 mg of 4 (40%) as a white solid. Mp = 108–111°C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ho); 7.34 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz, Hm); 2.72 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.68 (p, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.20 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.82 (bt, 3H, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 160.4 and 159.5 C3 and C5; 135.5 Cipso; 128.9 Cm; 128.7 Cp; 127.7 Co; 31.6 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 29.2 CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.8 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.0 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 26.9 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 14.0 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 278 (100%) [M+H]+. Anal (C15H20ClN3) % calculated (% found) C: 64.85 (65.09); H: 7.26 (7.42); N: 15.13 (15.35).4-(3-Heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)pyridine (
) and N′-[imino(pyridin-4-yl)methyl]octa-nehydrazide (
). Compound 5 was prepared from 2 (2.00 g, 12.7 mmol), octanoic hydrazide (1.35 g, 8.5 mmol), and NaOMe (918 mg, 17.0 mmol). Yield: 459 mg of 5 (23%) as a white solid and 1.61 g of 6 (45%) as a white solid. 5: Mp = 109–112°C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 8.69 (d, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz, Hm); 8.06 (d, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz, Ho); 2.85 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.78 (p, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.21 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.81 (bt, 3H, J = 6.7 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 159.4 and 159.2 C3 and C5; 149.4 Cm; 139.5 Cipso; 121.0 Co; 31.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 29.1 CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.8 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.1 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 26.7 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 13.9 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 245 (100%) [M+H]+. Anal (C14H20N4) % calculated (% found) C: 68.82 (68.71); H: 8.25 (8.36); N: 22.93 (22.78). 6: Mp = 135–138°C. 1H-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 8.67 (d, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz, Hm); 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz, Ho); 2.41 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.76 (m, 2H, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.41 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0,99 (bt, 3H, J = 6.0 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CD3OD) δ: 172.7 CONH; 151.7 C=NH; 150.4 Cm; 144.1 Cipso; 122.9 Co; 35.7 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 32.9 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 30.4 and 30.2 CH2CH2
CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 27.1 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 23.7 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 14.4 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 263 (100%) [M+H]+. Anal (C14H22N4O·1/2HCl) % calculated (% found) C: 59.93 (59.10); H: 8.08 (8.11); N: 19.97 (20.45).Intermediate 6 (1.00 g, 3.6 mmol) in dry EtOH (20 mL) reacted by refluxing with NaOMe (1.03 g, 19.0 mmol) for 4 days. Under this procedure, 5 was obtained in 78% yield (676 mg).
2.1.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 7a–15a and 7b–15b
2.1.5. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 16–18
To a solution of the corresponding triazole (1 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2 (4–10 mL), excess of MeI was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for the time indicated. Afterwards, solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was purified by chromatography or recrystallization from Et2O/CH2Cl2.4-(1-Benzyl-5-heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-1-methylpyridinium Iodide (
). Compound 16 was prepared from 13a (15 mg, 0.05 mmol) and MeI (4 μL, 0.07 mmol); reaction time: 16 h. Purification: flash chromatography [CH2Cl2/MeOH (99 : 1) → CH2Cl2/MeOH (9 : 1)]. Yield: 14 mg of 16 (66%) as a yellow gummy solid. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.18 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, Hm pyr); 8.54 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, Ho pyr); 7.35 (m, 3H, Ph); 7.19 (m, 2H, Ph); 5.36 (s, 2H, CH2Ar); 4.68 (s, 3H, NMe); 2.71 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.67 (p, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.23 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.85 (bt, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 159.0 C3; 155.3 C5; 146.7 Cipso pyr; 145.6 Cm pyr; 134.3 Cipso Ph; 129.1 Cm Ph; 128.6 Cp Ph; 127.3 Co Ph; 123.7 Co pyr; 53.0 CH2Ar; 49.1 NMe; 31.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 29.0 CH2CH2
CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.8 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 27.2 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 26.1 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 14.0 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 349 (100%), [M]+. Anal (C22H29IN4) % calculated (% found) C: 55.47 (55.42); H: 6.14 (6.30); N: 11.76 (11.57).4-[1-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-5-heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]-1-methylpyridinium Iodide (
). Compound 17 was prepared from 14a (70 mg, 0.2 mmol) and MeI (140 μL 2.3 mmol); reaction time: 8 days. Purification: flash chromatography [CH2Cl2/MeOH (95 : 5)]. Yield: 87 mg of 17 (90%) as a yellow gummy solid. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.21 (d, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, Hm pyr); 8.54 (d, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, Ho pyr); 7.33 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Hm Ar); 7.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, Ho Ar); 5.33 (s, 2H, CH2Ar); 4.68 (s, 3H, NMe); 2.71 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.69 (p, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.23 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.85 (bt, 3H, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 158.9 C3; 155.4 C5; 146.3 Cipso pyr; 145.7 Cm pyr; 134.4 Cipso Ar; 132.7 Cp Ar; 129.1 Cm Ar; 128.7 Co Ar; 123.5 Co pyr; 52.1 CH2Ar; 48.9 NMe; 31.4 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 28.9 CH2CH2
CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.6 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 27.0 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 25.9 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.4 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 13.9 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 383 (100%) [M]+. Anal (C22H28ClIN4) % calculated (% found) C: 51.73 (51.58); H: 5.52 (5.41); N: 10.97 (10.72).4-[1-(2,4-Dichlorobenzyl)-5-heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]-1-methylpyridinium Iodide (
). Compound 18 was prepared from 15a (50 mg, 0.1 mmol) and MeI (277 μL 4.45 mmol); reaction time: 8 days. Purification: recrystallization from Et2O/CH2Cl2. Yield: 43 mg of 18 (64%) as a yellow solid. Mp = 136–138°C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.22 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, Hm pyr); 8.53 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, Ho pyr); 7.44 (d, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, Hm′ Ar); 7.25 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz and 1.9 Hz, Hm Ar); 7.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ho Ar); 5.42 (s, 2H, CH2Ar); 4.69 (s, 3H, NMe); 2.76 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.72 (p, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2CH
2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3); 1.26 (m, 8H, CH2CH2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH
2CH3); 0.86 (bt, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 159.4 C3; 155.8 C5; 146.5 Cipso pyr; 145.7 Cm pyr; 135.4 Cipso Ar; 133.4 Cp Ar; 130.6 Co′ Ar; 130.3 Co Ar; 129.7 Cm′ Ar; 128,0 (Cm BnAr); 123,7 (Co CAr); 49,5 (CH2Ar); 49,2 (NMe); 31.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH3; 29.0 CH2CH2
CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 28.8 CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH3; 27.3 CH2
CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 25.9 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3; 22.5 CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2
CH2CH3; 14.0 CH3. MS (ES+) m/z: 417 (100%) [M]+. Anal (C22H27Cl2IN4) % calculated (% found) C: 48.46 (48.71); H: 4.99 (5.20); N: 10.27 (10.06).
2.2. Pharmacology
Radioligand Binding Assays. CB1R binding assays in rat cerebellar membranes were performed using [3H]-SR141716A and [3H]-WIN552122 (NEN-Dupont, Boston, MA, 40–60 Ci/mmol) as radioligands, using the previously described methods [14]. K
were calculated from the equation of Yung-Chi and Prusoff [15], using fixed K
values for either [3H]-WIN552122 (8 nM) or [3H]-SR141716A (4 nM) obtained from independent experimental assays.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Chemistry
5-Aryl-3-heptyl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles were first synthesized, and then they were alkylated with different benzyl halide reagents. Preparation of disubstituted triazoles 3–5 is depicted in Scheme 2. In the first step, 4-chlorobenzonitrile and 4-cyanopyridine reacted successively with sodium methoxide and ammonium chloride under inert conditions to afford amidinium hydrochlorides 1 and 2, respectively. Triazoles 3–5 were obtained from 1, 2 and the commercially available benzamidine hydrochloride in moderate yields by refluxing them with octanoic hydrazide under basic conditions. Cyclization of 4-amidinopyridinium hydrochloride (2) was incomplete and the addition intermediate 6 was allowed to be isolated. Acylamidrazone 6 was then cyclized to 5 under the same basic conditions (Scheme 2).
The second step took place with the alkylation of triazoles 3–5 under phase transfer catalysis conditions, using an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution as base and toluene as organic solvent [16]. These conditions were chosen after unsuccessful attempts of alkylation in an organic solvent (tetrahydrofuran) with mild (sodium bicarbonate) or strong (sodium hydride) bases. As depicted in Scheme 3, reaction of 3–5 with different benzyl halides in the presence of tetrabutylammonium bromide yielded two products by alkylation on N2 (7a–15a) or N1 (7b–15b) of the triazole. Alkylation on N4 of the triazole was not detected, since its formation is hindered by steric reasons. Both alkylated isomers were easily isolated by chromatography, being the N2-benzyl derivatives obtained in greater proportion (≈10 : 1). The only N1 isomer that could not be isolated and characterized was 13b; however it was detected by HPLC during the synthesis of 13a. Higher ratio of N2 isomers was obtained by alkylation of 5 with 4-chlorobenzyl and 2,4-dichlorobenzyl chlorides that led to a mixture of N2/N1 isomers in proportion of 13 : 1 and 18 : 1, respectively. These results support the fact that alkylation of 1,2,4-triazoles with benzyl halides is governed by steric reasons.
Scheme 3
Reagents: (i) benzyl bromide for 7a-7b, 10a-10b, and 13a; 4-chlorobenzyl chloride for 8a-8b, 11a-11b, and 14a-14b; and 2,4-dichlorobenzyl chloride for 9a-9b, 12a-12b, and 15a-15b; 40% NaOH aq, Bu4NBr, and toluene, 80°C.
Since compounds 7–15 are very lipophilic, pyridinium salts (16–18; Scheme 4) of some of the triazolylpyridines previously obtained were synthesized in order to test if they possessed improved aqueous solubility compared to the parent compounds. Increasing the aqueous solubility was important to perform the radioligand binding assays of the series of benzyl triazoles. Therefore, compounds 13a–15a readily reacted with an excess of methyl iodide (1.5 equiv for 13a, 11 equiv for 14a, and 44 equiv for 15a). Achievement of the triazolyl-1-methyl pyridinium salts needed long reaction times (16 h for 16 and 8 days for 17 and 18), but the products were obtained in good yields.
Scheme 4
Reagents: (i) MeI (excess), CH2Cl2, rt.
Qualitative solubility tests of compounds 16–18 did not show any improvement in their solubility in water; therefore they were not assessed by pharmacological assays.
3.2. Radioligand Binding Assays
Competitive radioligand binding assays have been used to evaluate the affinity of selected synthetized triazoles to CB1R in rat cerebellar membranes. They have been performed with [3H]-SR141716A and [3H]-WIN552122 as labelled ligands. The results of these preliminary assays are reported in Table 1.
Table 1
Affinity of compounds 7a-8a and 10a–12a and the reference cannabinoids SR141716 and LH21 for CB1R determined using rat cerebellar membranes and [3H]-SR141716 or [3H]-WIN552122 as radioligand. K
values were obtained from three independent experiments carried out in triplicate and are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Compound
Ki (nM) CB1R versus [3H]-SR141617
Ki (nM) CB1R versus [3H]-WIN552122
SR141716
Kd = 0.59
4
LH21
855.6 ± 296
748 ± 193
7a
436 ± 120
477 ± 94
8a
589 ± 136
561 ± 125
10a
389.5 ± 180
2437 ± 888
11a
562 ± 183
720 ± 165
12a
13.9 ± 2.4
323 ± 60.5
Compound 12a showed high CB1R affinity versus [3H]-SR141617 (K
= 13.9 nM) and moderate affinity versus [3H]-WIN552122 (K
= 323 nM). These binding data indicate that 12a displaced better SR141617, an inverse agonist of CB1R, than WIN552122, an agonist of CB1R. Since both SR141716 and WIN552122 have been reported in the literature to bind to CB1R in the same binding pocket [17], the results obtained here suggest that 12a binds to the inactive state of CB1R, as the inverse agonists do (e.g., SR141716), and not to the active state of the receptor, as the agonists do (e.g., WIN552122) [18].The other tested compounds 7a, 8a, 10a, and 11a showed moderate CB1R affinity with affinity constant values in the low micromolar range.In what refers to the binding to CB2R, none of the compounds showed significant affinity using [3H]-CP55940 as radioligand in membranes purified from cells transfected with human CB2R (data not shown).
4. Conclusions
In our ongoing program searching for novel cannabinoid ligands, we reported a CB1R antagonist [5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-hexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole, LH21], which showed an interesting in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profile and was able to reduce food intake and body weight in obese animals with major peripheral components. In the present study, we have explored structural modifications on this 1,2,4-triazole scaffold. A series of new 3(5)-alkyl-5(3)-aryl-1-benzyl-1H-1,2,4-triazoles were synthesized and competitive binding assays of selected compounds were carried out. One of these triazoles (12a) showed high affinity for CB1R.
Authors: Mónica Alonso; Antonia Serrano; Margarita Vida; Ana Crespillo; Laura Hernandez-Folgado; Nadine Jagerovic; Pilar Goya; Carmen Reyes-Cabello; Vidal Perez-Valero; Juan Decara; Manuel Macías-González; Francisco Javier Bermúdez-Silva; Juan Suárez; Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca; Francisco Javier Pavón Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Francisco Javier Pavon; Ainhoa Bilbao; Laura Hernández-Folgado; Andrea Cippitelli; Nadine Jagerovic; Gumersindo Abellán; M A Isabel Rodríguez-Franco; Antonia Serrano; Manuel Macias; Raquel Gómez; Miguel Navarro; Pilar Goya; Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: M Rinaldi-Carmona; F Barth; J Millan; J M Derocq; P Casellas; C Congy; D Oustric; M Sarran; M Bouaboula; B Calandra; M Portier; D Shire; J C Brelière; G L Le Fur Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Sean D McAllister; Dow P Hurst; Judy Barnett-Norris; Diane Lynch; Patricia H Reggio; Mary E Abood Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-08-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nadine Jagerovic; Laura Hernandez-Folgado; Ibon Alkorta; Pilar Goya; Miguel Navarro; Antonia Serrano; Fernando Rodriguez de Fonseca; M Teresa Dannert; Angela Alsasua; Margarita Suardiaz; David Pascual; Maria Isabel Martín Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: F J Pavón; A Serrano; V Pérez-Valero; N Jagerovic; L Hernández-Folgado; F J Bermúdez-Silva; M Macías; P Goya; F R de Fonseca Journal: J Neuroendocrinol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.627
Authors: Sean D McAllister; Gulrukh Rizvi; Sharon Anavi-Goffer; Dow P Hurst; Judy Barnett-Norris; Diane L Lynch; Patricia H Reggio; Mary E Abood Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-11-20 Impact factor: 7.446