Literature DB >> 14613317

An aromatic microdomain at the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor constitutes an agonist/inverse agonist binding region.

Sean D McAllister1, Gulrukh Rizvi, Sharon Anavi-Goffer, Dow P Hurst, Judy Barnett-Norris, Diane L Lynch, Patricia H Reggio, Mary E Abood.   

Abstract

The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor transmembrane helix (TMH) 3-4-5-6 region includes an aromatic microdomain comprised of residues F3.25, F3.36, W4.64, Y5.39, W5.43, and W6.48. In previous work, we have demonstrated that aromaticity at position 5.39 in CB(1) is crucial for proper function of CB(1). Modeling studies reported here suggest that in the inactive state of CB(1), the binding site of the CB(1) inverse agonist/antagonist SR141716A is within the TMH3-4-5-6 aromatic microdomain and involves direct aromatic stacking interactions with F3.36, Y5.39, and W5.43, as well as hydrogen bonding with K3.28. Further, modeling studies suggest that in the active state of CB(1), the CB agonist WIN55,212-2 binds in this same aromatic microdomain, with direct aromatic stacking interactions with F3.36, W5.43, and W6.48. In contrast, in the binding pocket model, the CB agonist anandamide binds in the TMH2-3-6-7 region in which hydrogen bonding and C-H.pi interactions appear to be important. Only one TMH3 aromatic residue, F3.25, was found to be part of the anandamide binding pocket. To probe the importance of the TMH3-4-5-6 aromatic microdomain to ligand binding, stable transfected cell lines were created for single-point mutations of each aromatic microdomain residue to alanine. Improper cellular expression of the W4.64A was observed and precluded further characterization of this mutation. The affinity of the cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 was unaffected by the F3.25A, F3.36A, W5.43A, or W6.48A mutations, making CP55,940 an appropriate choice as the radioligand for binding studies. The binding of SR141716A and WIN55,212-2 were found to be affected by the F3.36A, W5.43A, and W6.48A mutations, suggesting that these residues are part of the binding site for these two ligands. Only the F3.25A mutation was found to affect the binding of anandamide, suggesting a divergence in binding site regions for anandamide from WIN55,212-2, as well as SR141716A. Taken together, these results support modeling studies that identify the TMH3-4-5-6 aromatic microdomain as the binding region of SR141716A and WIN55,212-2, but not of anandamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14613317     DOI: 10.1021/jm0302647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  58 in total

1.  In silico investigation of interactions between human cannabinoid receptor-1 and its antagonists.

Authors:  Guanglin Kuang; Guoping Hu; Xianqiang Sun; Weihua Li; Guixia Liu; Yun Tang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Mutations of CB1 T210 produce active and inactive receptor forms: correlations with ligand affinity, receptor stability, and cellular localization.

Authors:  Aaron M D'Antona; Kwang H Ahn; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Ligand Binding Sensitivity of the Extracellular Loop Two of the Cannabinoid Receptor 1.

Authors:  Alexander C Bertalovitz; Kwang H Ahn; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 4.  Hallucinogen actions on 5-HT receptors reveal distinct mechanisms of activation and signaling by G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Harel Weinstein
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Residues accessible in the binding-site crevice of transmembrane helix 6 of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor.

Authors:  Ntsang M Nebane; Dow P Hurst; Carl A Carrasquer; Zhuanhong Qiao; Patricia H Reggio; Zhao-Hui Song
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Exploring the binding features of rimonabant analogues and acyclic CB1 antagonists: docking studies and QSAR analysis.

Authors:  Elena Cichero; Giulia Menozzi; Andrea Spallarossa; Luisa Mosti; Paola Fossa
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Crucial positively charged residues for ligand activation of the GPR35 receptor.

Authors:  Pingwei Zhao; Tom R Lane; Helen G L Gao; Dow P Hurst; Evangelia Kotsikorou; Long Le; Eugen Brailoiu; Patricia H Reggio; Mary E Abood
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Cannabinoids selectively inhibit proliferation and induce death of cultured human glioblastoma multiforme cells.

Authors:  Sean D McAllister; Calvin Chan; Ryan J Taft; Tri Luu; Mary E Abood; Dan H Moore; Ken Aldape; Garret Yount
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Positron emission tomography imaging using an inverse agonist radioligand to assess cannabinoid CB1 receptors in rodents.

Authors:  Garth Terry; Jeih-San Liow; Eyassu Chernet; Sami S Zoghbi; Lee Phebus; Christian C Felder; Johannes Tauscher; John M Schaus; Victor W Pike; Christer Halldin; Robert B Innis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Novel insights into CB1 cannabinoid receptor signaling: a key interaction identified between the extracellular-3 loop and transmembrane helix 2.

Authors:  Jahan Marcu; Derek M Shore; Ankur Kapur; Megan Trznadel; Alexandros Makriyannis; Patricia H Reggio; Mary E Abood
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.030

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.