Literature DB >> 27126700

Comparison of complications between pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter placement techniques.

Niloy Dasgupta1, Manish N Patel2, John M Racadio2, Neil D Johnson2, Matthew P Lungren3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is among the most common procedures performed in children in the hospital setting. PICC insertion can be simplified with the use of a sheathed needle as an alternative to the modified Seldinger technique.
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate PICC placement for the technique used and the incidence of complications at a large pediatric tertiary care center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all PICC placements at a single institution over a 4-year period. We reviewed patient records for demographic data, PICC placement technique, catheter size and number of lumens, and the incidence of complications (i.e. multiple attempted puncture sites, phlebitis and vessel thrombosis). We analyzed complication rates between two placement techniques using a chi-square test.
RESULTS: We identified 8,816 successful PICC placements, 4,749 (53.9%) in males and 4,067 (46.1%) in females. The average age of the patients for which a line was placed was 5.6 years (range 1 day to 45 years). A direct sheathed needle puncture technique was used in 8,362 (94.9%) placements and a modified Seldinger technique was used in 454 (5.1%). Complications occurred in 312 (3.7%) of direct sheathed needle puncture placements versus 17 (3.7%) of modified Seldinger placements (P = 0.99). Multiple puncture sites were required in 175 (2.1%) attempted direct sheathed needle puncture placements compared with 8 (1.7%) attempted modified Seldinger placements (P = 0.63). Phlebitis occurred in 94 (1.1%) direct sheathed needle puncture lines versus 5 (1.1%) modified Seldinger placed lines (P = 0.96). Vessel thrombosis occurred in 43 (0.5%) direct sheathed needle puncture lines versus 4 (0.9%) modified Seldinger placed lines (P = 0.30).
CONCLUSION: The direct peel-away sheathed needle vessel puncture technique and the modified Seldinger technique used to place PICC lines in children have similar complication rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Complications; Interventional radiology; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Seldinger technique; Sheathed needle vessel puncture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27126700     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3629-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric interventional venous access.

Authors:  Peter G Chait; Michael Temple; Bairbre Connolly; Phillip John; Ricardo Restrepo; Joao G Amaral
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter program report: a summary of 4,536 catheter days.

Authors:  A M Frey
Journal:  J Intraven Nurs       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Peripherally inserted central catheters.

Authors:  Fabienne C Bourgeois; Paula Lamagna; Vincent W Chiang
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.454

4.  Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in children guided by ultrasound: a prospective randomized, and controlled trial.

Authors:  Priscilla Sete de Carvalho Onofre; Mavilde da Luz Gonçalves Pedreira; Maria Angélica Sorgini Peterlini
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children.

Authors:  Ketan Jumani; Sonali Advani; Nicholas G Reich; Leslie Gosey; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  An evaluation of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for children with cancer requiring long-term venous access.

Authors:  Naoki Hatakeyama; Tsukasa Hori; Masaki Yamamoto; Nobuo Mizue; Natsuko Inazawa; Keita Igarashi; Hiroyuki Tsutsumi; Nobuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are a good option for prolonged venous access in children with cancer.

Authors:  Sarfraz Abedin; Gauri Kapoor
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Incidence of deep vein thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Josée Dubois; Françoise Rypens; Laurent Garel; Michèle David; Jacques Lacroix; France Gauvin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Experience using peripherally inserted central venous catheters for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in children at a community hospital.

Authors:  Patrick Van Winkle; Teri Whiffen; In-Lu Amy Liu
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Peripherally inserted central catheters in children.

Authors:  P G Chait; J Ingram; C Phillips-Gordon; H Farrell; C Kuhn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.