| Literature DB >> 27126637 |
Anne Kammel1,2, Sophie Saussenthaler1,2, Markus Jähnert1,2, Wenke Jonas1,2, Laura Stirm2,3, Andreas Hoeflich4, Harald Staiger2,3, Andreas Fritsche2,3, Hans-Ulrich Häring2,3, Hans-Georg Joost1,2, Annette Schürmann5,2, Robert W Schwenk1,2.
Abstract
Obesity and ectopic fat disposition are risk factors for metabolic disease. Recent data indicate that IGFBP2 expression in liver is epigenetically inhibited during hepatic steatosis. The aim of this study was to investigate if epigenetic de-regulation of hepatic Igfbp2 occurs already early in life and is associated with increased risk for diet-induced obesity (DIO) during adolescence. Male C57BL/6J mice received a high-fat diet. After 3 weeks on this diet (age of 6 weeks), DIO-susceptible (responder, Resp) and DIO-resistant (non-responder, nResp) mice were identified by early weight gain. At the age of 6 weeks, Resp mice exhibited elevated blood glucose (p < 0.05), plasma insulin (p < 0.01), HOMA-IR and leptin/adiponectin ratio, whereas liver triglycerides were identical but significantly increased (p < 0.01) in Resp mice at 20 weeks of age. Igfbp2 expression was reduced in young Resp compared with nResp mice (p < 0.01), an effect that correlated with elevated DNA methylation of intronic CpG2605 (p < 0.01). The epigenetic inhibition of Igfbp2 was stable over time and preceded DIO and hepatosteatosis in adult mice. In vitro studies demonstrated that selective methylation of CpG2605 significantly reduced reporter activity by ∼85%, indicating that Igfbp2 expression is modulated by methylation. In human whole blood cells, methylation of IGFBP2 at the homologous CpG site was increased in obese men with impaired glucose tolerance. In conclusion, our data show that increased methylation of hepatic Igfbp2 during infancy predicts the development of fatty liver later in life and is linked to deterioration of glucose metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27126637 PMCID: PMC5181631 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150
Figure 1.Impaired insulin sensitivity precedes liver fat accumulation. (A) Body weight development of DIO-responders (Resp, n = 9) and DIO-non-responders (nResp, n = 11) upon identification in week 6. Mice receiving an LFD served as control group. Body composition (B), fasted blood glucose (C), plasma insulin (D) and leptin (E) levels. (F) HOMA-IR calculated from fasted blood glucose and insulin levels. (G) LAR. (H) Liver triglyceride levels. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 10–15 animals per group. Differences between DIO-responder (Resp, black circle) and DIO-non-responder (nResp, white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Physiological parameters of nResp and Resp mice
| Week 6 | Week 20 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nResp | Resp | nResp | Resp | |||||||
| Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | |||
| Body weight (g) | 21.3 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 33.4 | 0.6 | 45.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
| Lean mass (g) | 17.1 | 0.2 | 19.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
| Fat mass (g) | 4.8 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.3 | <0.01 | 10.8 | 0.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
| Body length (cm) | 9.0 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.2 | 0.071 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.1 | 0.008 |
| Week 10 | ||||||||||
| Food intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.087 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 0.004 | 0.205 | |||||
| Water intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.354 | |||||
Figure 2.Modulation of the IGF axis. Hepatic Igfbp2 expression in 6 (A) and 20 (B) weeks old mice and the corresponding protein levels (C). Plasma IGFBP-2 (D) and IGFBP-3 (E) levels of the same animals determined by quantitative western ligand blot against IGF-2. (F) Plasma IGF-1 levels. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 8–12 animals per group. Differences between DIO-responder (Resp, black circle) and DIO-non-responder (nResp, white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3.Differential methylation of hepatic Igfbp2 at CpG2605. (A) Genomic localization of cg11669516 in the human IGFBP2 gene (region −500 bp and +3500 bp relative to the transcriptional start site). Methylation of the mouse homologue CpG2605 in week 6 (B) and in week 20 (E), respectively. Correlation of Igfbp2 expression and CpG2605 methylation at 6 (C) and 20 (F) weeks of age. Correlation of CpG2605 methylation and body weight at 6 (D) and 20 (G) weeks of age. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 10–14 animals per group. Differences between Resp (black circle) and nResp (white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Figure 4.pCpGL–Igfbp2 luciferase reporter assays. (A) Intragenic region of murine Igfbp2 gene spanning from 2320 to 2997 bp relative to TSS. Recognition sites for methyltransferases HpaII and M.SssI, CpG2605 depicted in grey. (B) Luciferase activity upon selective methylation of pCpGL-Igfbp2. Igfbp2 expression (C) and CpG2605 methylation (D) in NZO mice. Correlation of CpG2605 methylation and body weight (E), insulin concentrations (F) and LAR (G) of 6 weeks old HFD-fed C57BL/6J and NZO mice. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 3–4 independent experiments and n = 7 animals per group, respectively. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 compared with untreated control group.
Physiological parameters of male C57BL/6J and NZO mice
| Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 22.9 | 0.69 | 33.7 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
| Lean mass (g) | 20.5 | 0.57 | 27.2 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
| Fat mass (g) | 1.2 | 0.14 | 6.3 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
| Fasted BG (m | 6.3 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 0.78 | 0.175 |
| Fasted insulin (µg/L) | 0.7 | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (AU) | 5.2 | 0.62 | 24.5 | 4.46 | 0.001 |
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1 | 0.23 | 16.67 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
| Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6131 | 430 | 6227 | 458 | 0.881 |
| LAR (pg/ng) | 0.157 | 0.028 | 2.800 | 0.328 | <0.001 |
Figure 5.Igfbp2 expression and methylation during weight loss and regain. (A) Body weight development of mice fed an HFD for 20 weeks (HFD) which were then caloric restricted for 3 weeks (HFD–CR) and again fed an HFD for 3 weeks (HFD–CR–HFD). (B) Modulation of lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) during weight cycling. Hepatic Igfbp2 expression (C) and methylation of CpG2605 (D) during weight cycling. Blood glucose (E) and plasma insulin concentrations (F) of the indicated groups. All data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 animals per group). Differences between HFD, HFD–CR and HFD–CR–HFD mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Figure 6.Methylation of CpG2965 in human whole blood cells. (A) DNA methylation of CpG2965 in whole blood cells from human subjects classified into normal glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (NGT.BMI <27) or BMI >30 (NGT.BMI >30) or impaired glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (IGT.BMI <27) or BMI >30 (IGT.BMI >30). Correlation of CpG2965 methylation and fasted blood glucose (B). All data represented as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Characteristics of normal and impaired glucose tolerant men
| Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | Amount | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient age (years) | 57.8 | 1.73 | 60.2 | 1.27 | 61.2 | 1.37 | 57.2 | 1.59 |
| BMI | 24.5 | 0.33 | 33.5 | 0.73 | 25.43 | 0.21 | 34.3 | 0.65 |
| Fasted BG (m | 5.4 | 0.08 | 5.6 | 0.11 | 5.7 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.11 |
| oGTT (m | 5.9 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.27 | 9.3 | 0.20 | 9.2 | 0.19 |