| Literature DB >> 32752917 |
Helene A Fachim1,2, Camila M Loureiro3, Kirk Siddals1,2, Caroline F Dalton3, Gavin P Reynolds3, J Martin Gibson1,2, Zhen Bouman Chen4, Adrian H Heald1,2.
Abstract
We analysed if levels of four miRNAs would change after a lifestyle intervention involving dietary and exercises in prediabetes. MiRNAs previously shown to be associated with diabetes (Let-7a, Let-7e, miR-144 and miR-92a) were extracted from serum pre- and post-intervention. mRNA was extracted from fat-tissue for gene expression analyses. The intervention resulted in increased Let-7a and miR-92a. We found correlations between miRNAs and clinical variables (triglycerides, cholesterol, insulin, weight and BMI). We also found correlations between miRNAs and target genes, revealing a link between miR-92a and IGF system. A lifestyle intervention resulted in marked changes in miRNAs. The association of miRNAs with insulin and the IGF system (both receptors and binding proteins) may represent a mechanism of regulating IGFs metabolic actions.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating microRNAs; impaired glucose regulation (IGR); lifestyle change; pre-diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32752917 PMCID: PMC7469475 DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2020.1798632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adipocyte ISSN: 2162-3945 Impact factor: 4.534
Anthropometric measurements and clinical variables of IGR participants before and after the intervention
| Before | After | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All IGR participants ( | ||||
| Age (y) | 60.85 (12.1) | |||
| Weight (kg) | 101.5 (23.9) | 99.2 (24.7) | 0.025* | |
| Height (cm) | 168.85 (10.8) | |||
| BMI | 35.66 (7.6) | 34.86 (7.9) | 0.023* | |
| Waist-hip | 0.953 (0.08) | 0.950 (0.07) | 0.763 | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.37 (0.71) | 1.30 (0.38) | 0.685 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.75 (1.01) | 2.66 (1.04) | 0.593 | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.5 (0.79) | 1.62 (0.70) | 0.464 | |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 190.80 (259.9) | 270.93 (588.4) | 0.482 | |
| Total cholesterol | 4.69 (1.20) | 4.83 (1.11) | 0.328 | |
| HOMA-S | 68.4 (42.59) | 74.64 (56.86) | 0.757 | |
| HOMA-B | 134.35 (62.24) | 113.93 (39.22) | 0.078 | |
| FPG | 5.58 (0.87) | 5.90 (1.25) | 0.149 | |
| HbA1 c | 44.55 (2.52) | 45.11 (10.99) | 0.820 | |
| Patients maintained or lost 3% or more in weight ( | ||||
| Weight (kg) | 100.6 (24.5) | 97.2 (24.8) | 0.001* | |
| BMI | 35.5 (7.48) | 34.2 (7.71) | 0.001* | |
| Waist-hip | 0.95 (0.09) | 0.95 (0.07) | 0.726 | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.36 (0.77) | 1.28 (0.40) | 0.691 | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.75 (1.09) | 2.52 (1.12) | 0.232 | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.55 (0.85) | 1.62 (0.76) | 0.697 | |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 207.84 (279.20) | 301.55 (635.87) | 0.487 | |
| Total cholesterol | 4.69 (1.28) | 4.74 (1.18) | 0.741 | |
| HOMA-S | 73.28 (44.79) | 75.84 (60.47) | 0.913 | |
| HOMA-B | 126.35 (51.71) | 111.87 (36.41) | 0.236 | |
| FPG | 5.50 (0.87) | 5.28 (0.43) | 0.369 | |
| HbA1 c | 43.57 (1.39) | 39.42 (1.51) | 0.006* | |
*p values refer to paired T-test analysis of measures at baseline and after the lifestyle intervention. BMI: body mass index; HDL: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-S: Homoeostasis Model Assessment insulin sensitivity; HOMA-B: Homoeostasis Model Assessment beta-cell function; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin.
Figure 1.(a) MicroRNAs expression in serum of IGR individuals (n = 20) at baseline and 6 months after the lifestyle intervention. Data were analysed by Paired T-test and are expressed as Mean ± SD (p ≤ 0.025). (b) MicroRNAs expression in serum of IGR individuals which maintained weight or lost 3% of weight only (n = 17) at baseline and 6 months after the lifestyle intervention. Data were analysed by Paired T-test and are expressed as Mean ± SD (p ≤ 0.025)
Figure 2.(a) Correlation matrix among microRNAs and clinical variables in all IGR individuals at baseline. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05. The r values for each correlation are shown in the squares. (b) Correlation matrix among microRNAs and clinical variables in all IGR individuals post-intervention. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05. The r values for each correlation are shown in the squares
Figure 3.(a) Correlation matrix among microRNAs and clinical variables in IGR individuals who maintained or lost 3% in weight or more at baseline. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05. The r values for each correlation are shown in the squares. (b) Correlation matrix among microRNAs and clinical variables in IGR individuals who maintained or lost 3% in weight or more post-intervention. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05. The r values for each correlation are shown in the squares
Figure 4.(a) Scatter plots representing the correlations among microRNAs and target genes in all IGR individuals at baseline. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05, r ≥ 0.350. (b) Scatter plots representing the correlations among microRNAs and target genes in all IGR individuals post-intervention. Analysis were done by Pearson’s correlation, p ≤ 0.05 r ≥ 0.350