Vinoda Sharma1, Sanjit S Jolly2, Tahir Hamid1, Divyesh Sharma1, Joseph Chiha1, William Chan1, Felipe Fuchs1, Sanh Bui1, Peggy Gao2, Saleem Kassam3, Raymond C M Leung4, David Horák5, Hannu O Romppanen6, Magdi El-Omar7, Saqib Chowdhary7, Goran Stanković8, Saško Kedev9, Michael J Rokoss2, Tej Sheth2, Vladimír Džavík1, Christopher B Overgaard10. 1. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, 6 Eaton North Room 232, Toronto, ON, Canada Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5G 2C4. 2. The Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Rouge Valley Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. CK Hui Heart Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 5. KrajskáNemocnice Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic. 6. Heart Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 7. Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK. 8. Clinical Center of Serbia, Department of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. 9. University Clinic of Cardiology, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia. 10. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, 6 Eaton North Room 232, Toronto, ON, Canada Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5G 2C4 chris.overgaard1@gmail.com.
Abstract
AIMS: Thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been thought to be an effective therapy to prevent distal embolization and improve microvascular perfusion. The TOTAL trial (N = 10 732), a randomized trial of routine manual thrombectomy vs. PCI alone in STEMI, showed no difference in the primary efficacy outcome. This angiographic sub-study was performed to determine if thrombectomy improved microvascular perfusion as measured by myocardial blush grade (MBG). METHODS AND RESULTS:Of the 10 732 patients randomized, 1610 randomly selected angiograms were analysable by the angiographic core laboratory. Primary outcomes included MBG and post-PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade. Secondary outcomes included distal embolization, PPCI complications, and each component of the complications. The primary end point of final myocardial blush (221 [28%] 0/1 for thrombectomy vs. 246 {30%} 0/1 for PCI alone group, P = 0.38) and TIMI flow (712 [90%] TIMI 3 for thrombectomy vs. 733 [89.5%] TIMI 3 for PCI alone arm, P = 0.73) was similar in the two groups. Thrombectomy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of distal embolization compared with PCI alone (56 [7.1%] vs. 87 [10.7%], P = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, distal embolization was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.19-7.58) while MBG was not (HR 2.73, 95% CI 0.94-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Routine thrombectomy during PPCI did not result in improved MBG or post-PCI TIMI flow grade but did reduce distal embolization compared with PCI alone. Distal embolization and not blush grade is independently associated with mortality. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been thought to be an effective therapy to prevent distal embolization and improve microvascular perfusion. The TOTAL trial (N = 10 732), a randomized trial of routine manual thrombectomy vs. PCI alone in STEMI, showed no difference in the primary efficacy outcome. This angiographic sub-study was performed to determine if thrombectomy improved microvascular perfusion as measured by myocardial blush grade (MBG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 10 732 patients randomized, 1610 randomly selected angiograms were analysable by the angiographic core laboratory. Primary outcomes included MBG and post-PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade. Secondary outcomes included distal embolization, PPCI complications, and each component of the complications. The primary end point of final myocardial blush (221 [28%] 0/1 for thrombectomy vs. 246 {30%} 0/1 for PCI alone group, P = 0.38) and TIMI flow (712 [90%] TIMI 3 for thrombectomy vs. 733 [89.5%] TIMI 3 for PCI alone arm, P = 0.73) was similar in the two groups. Thrombectomy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of distal embolization compared with PCI alone (56 [7.1%] vs. 87 [10.7%], P = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, distal embolization was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.19-7.58) while MBG was not (HR 2.73, 95% CI 0.94-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Routine thrombectomy during PPCI did not result in improved MBG or post-PCI TIMI flow grade but did reduce distal embolization compared with PCI alone. Distal embolization and not blush grade is independently associated with mortality. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: J H Reiber; P W Serruys; C J Kooijman; W Wijns; C J Slager; J J Gerbrands; J C Schuurbiers; A den Boer; P G Hugenholtz Journal: Circulation Date: 1985-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Alexander Hirsch; Martin G Stoel; Mark B M Hofman; Victor A W M Umans; Paul R Algra; Jos W R Twisk; Albert C van Rossum Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D R Holmes; R Holubkov; R E Vlietstra; S F Kelsey; G S Reeder; G Dorros; D O Williams; M J Cowley; D P Faxon; K M Kent Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sigmund Silber; Per Albertsson; Francisco F Avilés; Paolo G Camici; Antonio Colombo; Christian Hamm; Erik Jørgensen; Jean Marco; Jan-Erik Nordrehaug; Witold Ruzyllo; Philip Urban; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sanjit S Jolly; John A Cairns; Salim Yusuf; Michael J Rokoss; Peggy Gao; Brandi Meeks; Sasko Kedev; Goran Stankovic; Raul Moreno; Anthony Gershlick; Saqib Chowdhary; Shahar Lavi; Kari Niemela; Ivo Bernat; Warren J Cantor; Asim N Cheema; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Robert C Welsh; Tej Sheth; Olivier F Bertrand; Alvaro Avezum; Ravinay Bhindi; Madhu K Natarajan; David Horak; Raymond C M Leung; Saleem Kassam; Sunil V Rao; Magdi El-Omar; Shamir R Mehta; James L Velianou; Samir Pancholy; Vladimír Džavík Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rafał Januszek; Zbigniew Siudak; Krzysztof P Malinowski; Roman Wojdyła; Piotr Mika; Wojciech Wańha; Tomasz Kameczura; Andrzej Surdacki; Wojciech Wojakowski; Jacek Legutko; Stanisław Bartuś Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Jay S Shavadia; Christopher B Granger; Wendimagegn Alemayehu; Cynthia M Westerhout; Thomas J Povsic; Sean Van Diepen; Christopher Defilippi; Paul W Armstrong Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 5.501