| Literature DB >> 27125917 |
Thomas P Van Boeckel1,2, Saki Takahashi1, Qiaohong Liao3, Weijia Xing3, Shengjie Lai3,4, Victor Hsiao1, Fengfeng Liu3, Yaming Zheng3, Zhaorui Chang3, Chen Yuan3, C Jessica E Metcalf1,5, Hongjie Yu3, Bryan T Grenfell1,6.
Abstract
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) constitutes a considerable burden for health care systems across China. Yet this burden displays important geographic heterogeneity that directly affects the local persistence and the dynamics of the disease, and thus the ability to control it through vaccination campaigns. Here, we use detailed geographic surveillance data and epidemic models to estimate the critical community size (CCS) of HFMD associated enterovirus serotypes CV-A16 and EV-A71 and we explore what spatial vaccination strategies may best reduce the burden of HFMD. We found CCS ranging from 336,979 (±225,866) to 722,372 (±150,562) with the lowest estimates associated with EV-A71 in the southern region of China where multiple transmission seasons have previously been identified. Our results suggest the existence of a regional immigration-recolonization dynamic driven by urban centers. If EV-A71 vaccines doses are limited, these would be optimally deployed in highly populated urban centers and in high-prevalence areas. If HFMD vaccines are included in China's National Immunization Program in order to achieve high coverage rates (>85%), routine vaccination of newborns largely outperforms strategies in which the equivalent number of doses is equally divided between routine vaccination of newborns and pulse vaccination of the community at large.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27125917 PMCID: PMC4850478 DOI: 10.1038/srep25248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Scaling of the transmission parameters for the TSIR model between the province and county scale in Beijing municipality.
(A) Guangdong Province (B) and Hubei Province (C). In each location the average transmission rate was respectively scaled by a factor of 1.10, 2.42 and 0.05 for A, B and C after re-fitting. This figure was generated using the open source statistical software R (cran.r-project.org), version number 3.0.3, including packages maptools and foreign.
Figure 2Critical Community size of EV-A71.
Population per county as a function of the proportion of zeros in weekly incidence for observed and predicted time series. The intersection of the fitted function with the y-axis indicated the estimate of the critical community size for EV-A71. N is the number of counties with at least one epidemic fadeout.
Figure 3Critical community size of CV-A16.
Population per county as a function of the proportion of zeros in weekly incidence for observed and predicted time series. The intersection the fitted function with the y-axis indicated the estimate of the critical community size for CV-A16. N is the number of counties with at least one epidemic fadeout.
Figure 4Routine vaccination.
Effect of routine vaccination at birth on the critical community size of HFMD in the Northern (blue) and Southern (red) regions of China.
EV71.
| Province | Corr. | R2 | Rep. Rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.792 | 0.628 | 42.74 | 0.035 | 0.0995 |
| Tianjin | 0.925 | 0.856 | 6.41 | 0.232 | 0.0897 |
| Hebei | 0.954 | 0.91 | 37.87 | 0.043 | 0.0391 |
| Shanxi | 0.969 | 0.939 | 35.58 | 0.044 | 0.0338 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.926 | 0.857 | 2.09 | 0.738 | 0.03 |
| Liaoning | 0.875 | 0.766 | 35.25 | 0.043 | 0.0607 |
| Jilin | 0.932 | 0.868 | 5.71 | 0.262 | 0.0432 |
| Heilongjiang | 0.946 | 0.894 | 15.11 | 0.101 | 0.0186 |
| Shanghai | 0.864 | 0.746 | 22.8 | 0.067 | 0.0914 |
| Jiangsu | 0.907 | 0.823 | 30.12 | 0.054 | 0.0633 |
| Zhejiang | 0.881 | 0.776 | 43.16 | 0.037 | 0.0973 |
| Anhui | 0.868 | 0.754 | 36.99 | 0.044 | 0.0559 |
| Fujian | 0.887 | 0.786 | 52.61 | 0.03 | 0.0743 |
| Jiangxi | 0.816 | 0.666 | 20.16 | 0.08 | 0.0282 |
| Shandong | 0.975 | 0.95 | 5.31 | 0.308 | 0.0418 |
| Henan | 0.937 | 0.878 | 8.29 | 0.2 | 0.0296 |
| Hubei | 0.935 | 0.875 | 12.23 | 0.132 | 0.0544 |
| Hunan | 0.847 | 0.718 | 26.14 | 0.063 | 0.0657 |
| Guangdong | 0.863 | 0.746 | 19.65 | 0.084 | 0.1144 |
| Guangxi | 0.853 | 0.728 | 21.28 | 0.076 | 0.125 |
| Hainan | 0.723 | 0.523 | 11.32 | 0.131 | 0.1594 |
| Chongqing | 0.856 | 0.732 | 104.05 | 0.015 | 0.0355 |
| Sichuan | 0.799 | 0.639 | 96.06 | 0.017 | 0.0269 |
| Guizhou | 0.834 | 0.695 | 28.37 | 0.056 | 0.0405 |
| Yunnan | 0.886 | 0.785 | 47.14 | 0.034 | 0.0401 |
| Tibet | 0.617 | 0.38 | 30.61 | 0.049 | 0.0118 |
| Shaanxi | 0.932 | 0.869 | 55.65 | 0.028 | 0.0641 |
| Gansu | 0.97 | 0.941 | 20.41 | 0.076 | 0.0153 |
| Qinghai | 0.617 | 0.38 | 8.26 | 0.187 | 0.0111 |
| Ningxia | 0.972 | 0.945 | 1.47 | 1 | 0.0373 |
| Xinjiang | 0.965 | 0.932 | 4.7 | 0.331 | 0.0092 |
Provincial TSIR, fitting correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, mean transmission rate and mean proportion of susceptible.
CA16 Provincial.
| Province | Corr. | R2 | Rep.Rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.907 | 0.823 | 50.08 | 0.03 | 0.0658 |
| Tianjin | 0.799 | 0.639 | 29.17 | 0.051 | 0.06176 |
| Hebei | 0.959 | 0.92 | 28.63 | 0.057 | 0.02432 |
| Shanxi | 0.925 | 0.856 | 35.63 | 0.044 | 0.02349 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.937 | 0.878 | 25.28 | 0.061 | 0.02536 |
| Liaoning | 0.959 | 0.92 | 33.73 | 0.045 | 0.03746 |
| Jilin | 0.937 | 0.878 | 31.11 | 0.048 | 0.02974 |
| Heilongjiang | 0.516 | 0.266 | 66.61 | 0.023 | 0.01076 |
| Shanghai | 0.85 | 0.722 | 37.21 | 0.041 | 0.07835 |
| Jiangsu | 0.928 | 0.862 | 30.68 | 0.053 | 0.03842 |
| Zhejiang | 0.878 | 0.771 | 24.2 | 0.066 | 0.05809 |
| Anhui | 0.86 | 0.74 | 23.62 | 0.069 | 0.03612 |
| Fujian | 0.892 | 0.796 | 21.36 | 0.074 | 0.04757 |
| Jiangxi | 0.827 | 0.684 | 17.02 | 0.095 | 0.01899 |
| Shandong | 0.977 | 0.954 | 11.93 | 0.137 | 0.0273 |
| Henan | 0.934 | 0.872 | 36.02 | 0.046 | 0.01834 |
| Hubei | 0.917 | 0.84 | 29.91 | 0.054 | 0.03221 |
| Hunan | 0.872 | 0.76 | 29.91 | 0.055 | 0.04104 |
| Guangdong | 0.842 | 0.708 | 56.93 | 0.029 | 0.07558 |
| Guangxi | 0.857 | 0.734 | 40.41 | 0.04 | 0.08797 |
| Hainan | 0.712 | 0.507 | 21.83 | 0.068 | 0.08981 |
| Chongqing | 0.87 | 0.757 | 16.91 | 0.093 | 0.02302 |
| Sichuan | 0.812 | 0.66 | 29.24 | 0.056 | 0.01494 |
| Guizhou | 0.805 | 0.648 | 26.06 | 0.061 | 0.02541 |
| Yunnan | 0.88 | 0.775 | 23.24 | 0.069 | 0.02726 |
| Tibet | 0.458 | 0.21 | 11.15 | 0.143 | 0.00595 |
| Shaanxi | 0.963 | 0.927 | 41.23 | 0.038 | 0.03663 |
| Gansu | 0.949 | 0.9 | 34.35 | 0.045 | 0.00997 |
| Qinghai | 0.845 | 0.715 | 5.22 | 0.296 | 0.03849 |
| Ningxia | 0.946 | 0.894 | 10.32 | 0.143 | 0.02454 |
| Xinjiang | 0.935 | 0.873 | 28.09 | 0.056 | 0.00502 |
TSIR fitting correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, mean transmission rate and mean proportion of susceptible.
Figure 5Spatial vaccination strategies.
(A) Vaccination targeted in counties with the lowest population, (B) vaccination in the highly populated counties, (C) Vaccination in the counties where population is the close to the regional CCS, and (D) vaccination in randomly selected counties. (E) Vaccination in high prevalence counties. Red indicates vaccinated areas, white indicates unvaccinated areas, grey indicates areas excluded from the analysis. This figure was generated using the open source statistical software R (cran.r-project.org), version number 3.0.3, including packages maptools and foreign.
Mean reduction in the cumulated number of infectious individuals following weekly vaccination of 50% of newborns according to different spatial vaccination strategies.
| Spatial Strategy | Red 5-Years (%) ± 95% | Red 20-Years (%) ± 95% |
|---|---|---|
| Random (A) | 35.4 [33.1;37.7] | 42.4 [41.9;42.8] |
| Close-CCS (B) | 36.9 [34.2;39.6] | 43.7 [43.3;44.2] |
| Large(C) | 46.7 [44.2;49.2] | 49.5 [49.0;50.1] |
| Small(D) | 36.1 [33.7;38.5] | 43.3 [42.8;43.7] |
| High Prevalence (E) | 48.8 [46.7;50.9] | 53.8 [53.4;54.2] |
Coverage rate = 85% and vaccine efficacy = 94.8% in each vaccinated county.
Reduction in the cumulated number of infectious individuals following vaccination of 85% newborns at birth (strategy F) or combination of routine vaccination (42.5%) and pulse vaccination (42.5%) according to different spatial vaccination strategies (A, B, C, D, E).
| Strategy | Red 5-Years (%) ± 95% | Red 20-Years (%) ± 95% |
|---|---|---|
| Random (A) | 46.1 [44.0;48.2] | 48.1 [47.7;48.5] |
| Close-CCS (B) | 38.2 [35.7;40.7] | 43.3 [42.8;43.8] |
| Large(C) | 47.7 [45.1;50.2] | 49.2 [45.5;52.9] |
| Small(D) | 37.3 [35.2;39.5] | 42.4 [42.0;42.9] |
| High Prevalence (E) | 48.6 [46.3;50.8] | 52.4 [52.0;52.9] |
| Routine 85% (F) | 71.7 [70.0;73.4] | 77.8 [77.3;78.2] |
| Routine non-NIP (F | 39.4 [23.3;56.6] | 40.7 [25.2;60.0] |
Coverage rate = 85% and vaccine efficacy = 94.8% in each vaccinated county.
*The confidence interval for simulations of vaccination outside of China’s National Immunization Program (non-NIP) are based on the range of estimates found from the existing literature (Supplementary Information, Table SIV 1).