Literature DB >> 27125821

Image quality and variability for routine diagnostic FDG-PET scans in a Japanese community hospital: current status and possibility of improvement.

Keiji Shimizu1,2, Seiichi Yamamoto3, Keiichi Matsumoto4, Megumu Hino5, Michio Senda6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In Japan, commercially delivered FDG is manufactured in three batches per day at fixed constant activity and distributed in vials. Consequently, the amount of activity administered to the patient varies depending on the timing of injection. We evaluated a method for adjusting the scan time according to the body mass index (BMI) to obtain equivalent image quality for every patient.
METHODS: We examined a total of 301 routine clinical oncology PET scans using commercially delivered FDG. The relation between the injected activity and the noise equivalent count per scan length (NECpatient) was evaluated as a marker of image quality; its association with BMI was also examined.
RESULTS: The injected activity and NECpatient exhibited large variations (230.4 ± 55.8 MBq and 19.9 ± 2.9 Mcounts/m). There was a weak correlation between the injected activity and NECpatient (r ~ 0.3) for thin patients (BMI < 21 kg/m(2)), but no correlation for patients with higher BMIs. However, a significant correlation was found between BMI and NECpatient (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In a community hospital using commercially delivered FDG, it is possible to reduce the variability of the NECpatient and obtain uniform image quality by changing the scan time as a function of patient BMI, even with uncontrollable injected activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commercially delivered FDG; Image quality; Oncology; PET/CT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27125821     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-016-0547-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  9 in total

1.  Respiration-induced attenuation artifact at PET/CT: technical considerations.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Cyrill Burger; Ehab Kamel; Burkhardt Seifert; Achim H Kaim; Alfred Buck; Tobias C Buehler; Gustav K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards.

Authors:  E De Ponti; S Morzenti; L Guerra; C Pasquali; M Arosio; V Bettinardi; A Crespi; M C Gilardi; C Messa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality.

Authors:  Akio Nagaki; Masahisa Onoguchi; Norikazu Matsutomo
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2011-05-12

4.  Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Fukukita; Michio Senda; Takashi Terauchi; Kazufumi Suzuki; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Keiichi Matsumoto; Yasuhiko Ikari; Masuo Hayashi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans.

Authors:  Charles C Watson; Michael E Casey; Bernard Bendriem; Jonathan P Carney; David W Townsend; Stefan Eberl; Steve Meikle; Frank P Difilippo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  FDG-PET for clinical use. Results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, "Onko-PET III", 21 July and 19 September 2000.

Authors:  S N Reske; J Kotzerke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-11

7.  Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.

Authors:  Yoko Masuda; Chisato Kondo; Yuka Matsuo; Masataka Uetani; Kiyoko Kusakabe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Roberto Delgado-Bolton; Wim J G Oyen; Francesco Giammarile; Klaus Tatsch; Wolfgang Eschner; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Sally F Barrington; Lucy C Pike; Wolfgang A Weber; Sigrid Stroobants; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Scott Holbrook; Michael M Graham; Giorgio Testanera; Otto S Hoekstra; Josee Zijlstra; Eric Visser; Corneline J Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Antoon Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Optimized dose regimen for whole-body FDG-PET imaging.

Authors:  Eleonore H de Groot; Nieky Post; Ronald Boellaard; Nils Rl Wagenaar; Antoon Tm Willemsen; Jorn A van Dalen
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.