Literature DB >> 27125526

Clinical Scales Do Not Reliably Identify Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large-Artery Occlusion.

Guillaume Turc1, Benjamin Maïer2, Olivier Naggara2, Pierre Seners2, Clothilde Isabel2, Marie Tisserand2, Igor Raynouard2, Myriam Edjlali2, David Calvet2, Jean-Claude Baron2, Jean-Louis Mas2, Catherine Oppenheim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: It remains debated whether clinical scores can help identify acute ischemic stroke patients with large-artery occlusion and hence improve triage in the era of thrombectomy. We aimed to determine the accuracy of published clinical scores to predict large-artery occlusion.
METHODS: We assessed the performance of 13 clinical scores to predict large-artery occlusion in consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing clinical examination and magnetic resonance or computed tomographic angiography ≤6 hours of symptom onset. When no cutoff was published, we used the cutoff maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity in our cohort. We also determined, for each score, the cutoff associated with a false-negative rate ≤10%.
RESULTS: Of 1004 patients (median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, 7; range, 0-40), 328 (32.7%) had an occlusion of the internal carotid artery, M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, or basilar artery. The highest accuracy (79%; 95% confidence interval, 77-82) was observed for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≥11 and Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale score ≥5. However, these cutoffs were associated with false-negative rates >25%. Cutoffs associated with an false-negative rate ≤10% were 5, 1, and 0 for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale, and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using published cutoffs for triage would result in a loss of opportunity for ≥20% of patients with large-artery occlusion who would be inappropriately sent to a center lacking neurointerventional facilities. Conversely, using cutoffs reducing the false-negative rate to 10% would result in sending almost every patient to a comprehensive stroke center. Our findings, therefore, suggest that intracranial arterial imaging should be performed in all patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basilar artery; middle cerebral artery; stroke; thrombectomy; triage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27125526     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  42 in total

1.  Prehospital stroke scales as screening tools for early identification of stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Zhivko Zhelev; Greg Walker; Nicholas Henschke; Jonathan Fridhandler; Samuel Yip
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-09

2.  Evolution of a US County System for Acute Comprehensive Stroke Care.

Authors:  Radoslav I Raychev; Dana Stradling; Nirav Patel; Joey R Gee; David A Lombardi; Johnson L Moon; David M Brown; Mayank Pathak; Wengui Yu; Samuel J Stratton; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Electroencephalography Measures are Useful for Identifying Large Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Lauren Shreve; Arshdeep Kaur; Christopher Vo; Jennifer Wu; Jessica M Cassidy; Andrew Nguyen; Robert J Zhou; Thuong B Tran; Derek Z Yang; Ariana I Medizade; Bharath Chakravarthy; Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Erik Barton; Wengui Yu; Ramesh Srinivasan; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Two Paradigms for Endovascular Thrombectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Gaspard Gerschenfeld; Ioan-Paul Muresan; Raphael Blanc; Michael Obadia; Marie Abrivard; Michel Piotin; Sonia Alamowitch
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 18.302

5.  Glasgow Coma Scale on Presentation Predicts Outcome in Endovascular Treatment for Acute Posterior Large-Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  A H Chiu; D A Hince; W McAuliffe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Association of a Primary Stroke Center Protocol for Suspected Stroke by Large-Vessel Occlusion With Efficiency of Care and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan A McTaggart; Shadi Yaghi; Shawna M Cutting; Morgan Hemendinger; Grayson L Baird; Richard A Haas; Karen L Furie; Mahesh V Jayaraman
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  The Accuracy of Large Vessel Occlusion Recognition Scales in Telestroke Setting.

Authors:  Mohammad Anadani; Eyad Almallouhi; Amy E Wahlquist; Ellen Debenham; Christine A Holmstedt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 8.  Unresolved Issues in Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart; Mayank Goyal
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Outcome of patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score.

Authors:  Mirjam R Heldner; Panagiotis Chaloulos-Iakovidis; Leonidas Panos; Bastian Volbers; Johannes Kaesmacher; Tomas Dobrocky; Pasquale Mordasini; Marwan El-Koussy; Jan Gralla; Marcel Arnold; Urs Fischer; Heinrich P Mattle; Simon Jung
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  [Prehospital care for stroke patients].

Authors:  C H Nolte; H J Audebert
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 0.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.