Literature DB >> 27124625

Evolution and oncological outcomes of a contemporary radical prostatectomy practice in a UK regional tertiary referral centre.

Vincent J Gnanapragasam1,2, David Thurtle3, Anandagopal Srinivasan4, Dimitrios Volanis4, Anne George3, Artitaya Lophatananon5, Sara Stearn3, Anne Y Warren6, Alastair D Lamb3,4, Greg Shaw4, Naomi Sharma7, Ben C Thomas4, Maxine G Tran4, David E Neal3, Nimish C Shah8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and pathological trends, over a 10-year period, in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in a UK regional tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1 500 consecutive patients underwent RALP between October 2005 and January 2015. Prospective data were collected on clinicopathological details at presentation as well as surgical outcomes and compared over time.
RESULTS: The median (range) age of patients throughout the period was 62 (35-78) years. The proportion of preoperative high-grade cases (Gleason score 8-10) rose from 4.6% in 2005-2008 to 18.2% in 2013-2015 (P < 0.001). In the same periods the proportion of clinical stage T3 cases operated on rose from 2.4% to 11.4% (P < 0.001). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis did not alter significantly. Overall, 11.6% of men in 2005-2008 were classified preoperatively as high-risk by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criteria, compared with 33.6% in 2013-2015 (P < 0.001). The corresponding proportions for low-risk cases were 48.6% and 17.3%, respectively. Final surgical pathology showed an increase in tumour stage, Gleason grade, and nodal status over time. The proportion of pT3 cases rose from 43.2% in 2005-2008 to 55.5% in 2013-2015 (P < 0.001), Gleason score 9-10 tumours increased from 1.8% to 9.1% (P < 0.001) and positive nodal status increased from 1.6% to 12.9% (P < 0.001) between the same periods. Despite this, positive surgical margin rates showed a downward trend in all pT groups across the different eras (P = 0.72).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the patient profile for RALP in our unit is changing, with increasing proportions of higher stage and more advanced disease being referred and operated on. However, surgical margin outcomes have remained good.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high risk; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27124625     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

Authors:  Pooya Banapour; Andrew Schumacher; Jane C Lin; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

2.  The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy

Authors:  Virote Chalieopanyarwong; Worapat Attawettayanon; Watid Kanchanawanichkul; Choosak Pripatnanont
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  [Trivialization of prostate cancer? : Stage shift and possible causes].

Authors:  M Saar; M S K M Abdeen; C Niklas; Z T F Al-Kailani; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Sexual function outcomes following interventions for prostate cancer: are contemporary reports on functional outcomes misleading?

Authors:  Catherine E Lovegrove; Vincenzo Ficarra; Francesco Montorsi; James N'Dow; Andrea Salonia; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Harshit Garg; Amlesh Seth; Prabhjot Singh; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  A comparison of operative and margin outcomes from surgeon learning curves in robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a changing referral practice.

Authors:  A Jaulim; A Srinivasan; S Hori; N Kumar; A Y Warren; N C Shah; V J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Ashwin Sachdeva; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Antonia Voysey; Katherine Kelly; Mark I Johnson; Jonathan Aning; Naeem A Soomro
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.