Literature DB >> 27124621

Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends.

William R Rowley1, Clement Bezold1, Yasemin Arikan1, Erin Byrne2, Shannon Krohe3.   

Abstract

To forecast future trends in diabetes prevalence, morbidity, and costs in the United States, the Institute for Alternative Futures has updated its diabetes forecasting model and extended its projections to 2030 for the nation, all states, and several metropolitan areas. This paper describes the methodology and data sources for these diabetes forecasts and discusses key implications. In short, diabetes will remain a major health crisis in America, in spite of medical advances and prevention efforts. The prevalence of diabetes (type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes) will increase by 54% to more than 54.9 million Americans between 2015 and 2030; annual deaths attributed to diabetes will climb by 38% to 385,800; and total annual medical and societal costs related to diabetes will increase 53% to more than $622 billion by 2030. Improvements in management reducing the annual incidence of morbidities and premature deaths related to diabetes over this time period will result in diabetes patients living longer, but requiring many years of comprehensive management of multiple chronic diseases, resulting in dramatically increased costs. Aggressive population health measures, including increased availability of diabetes prevention programs, could help millions of adults prevent or delay the progression to type 2 diabetes, thereby helping turn around these dire projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27124621      PMCID: PMC5278808          DOI: 10.1089/pop.2015.0181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Health Manag        ISSN: 1942-7891            Impact factor:   2.459


Introduction

Diabetes and its complications, deaths, and societal costs have a huge and rapidly growing impact on the United States. Between 1990 and 2010 the number of people living with diabetes tripled and the number of new cases annually (incidence) doubled.[1] Adults with diabetes have a 50% higher risk of death from any cause than adults without diabetes, in addition to risk for myriad complications.[2] Reducing this burden will require efforts on many fronts—from appropriate medical care to significant public health efforts and individual behavior change across the nation, through state- and community-specific efforts. Public awareness is a key first step. For this purpose, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) releases national diabetes statistics every 2 years, providing a point-in-time picture of diabetes for the country as a whole. However, state and metropolitan diabetes forecasts with projections several years into the future also are useful as health professionals and decision makers contemplate actions to address the diabetes epidemic. Therefore, the Institute for Alternative Futures (IAF) has prepared 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 diabetes forecasts for the entire United States, every state, and several metropolitan statistical areas, all of which are easily accessible on the Internet.[3] This study shows how past trends, current data, and future projections provide valuable insights about the possible course of diabetes.

Methods

Prevalence of prediabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and diagnosed diabetes

The IAF Diabetes 2030 Model utilizes many features of the previous 2025 Model that were updated based on new diabetes data trends.[4] Estimates of diagnosed diabetes prevalence to 2030 are derived from Boyle et al's sophisticated dynamic modeling paper, which projected the diabetes burden to 2050.[5] The present study utilized Boyle et al's conservative 3-state dynamic model, middle-ground scenario of low, steady diabetes incidence (8.4 cases per 1000 adult population) and low diabetes mortality. However, 2 recent studies suggest that the diagnosed diabetes incidence trend has begun to level off and could be declining.[6,7] It is difficult to know if this trend will continue, and hard to forecast to what extent long-term prevalence might be reduced because so many other factors, such as an aging population and falling diabetes morbidity and mortality, enter into the equation. Because the incidence used in Boyle et al's model is higher than present experience, the research team reduced its prevalence growth to 2030 by a modest 2% to prevent overestimating the magnitude of diagnosed diabetes. The team made 2 other significant changes. Their 2025 Model utilized Boyle et al's projection that undiagnosed diabetes would be 33% of total diabetes in 2015, declining to 25% in 2030. Based on the trend of CDC national diabetes statistics (29.8% of total diabetes being undiagnosed in 2005, 24.2% in 2007, 27.1% in 2010, and 27.8% in 2012),[2,8,9,10] the IAF model projects 27% will be undiagnosed in 2015, declining to 24% in 2030. Second, the prevalence of prediabetes has been progressively climbing in CDC national statistics (20% of the adult population in 2000, 26% in 2007, 35% in 2010, and 37% in 2012), so the IAF model used 38% of the population ages 20 years and older having prediabetes in 2015, slowly increasing to 40% in 2030. Each state and metropolitan area has its unique prevalence rates. Based on the latest CDC data, Dall et al calculated the prevalence of diagnosed, undiagnosed, and prediabetes for every state for 2012.[11] Utilizing the ratio of each state to US prevalence rates and assuming this rate remains constant between 2015 and 2030 (there are no data available to estimate a state's future variation), state diagnosed, undiagnosed, and prediabetes forecasts were created. Metropolitan area forecasts utilized their state prevalence rates.

Population data

The national census data (including race and Hispanic origin) population projections to 2030 came from 2010 US Census Bureau data.[12] Unfortunately, state projections have not been updated with the 2010 census so 2000 census data were used.[13] Census data of state minority projections to 2025 were last calculated from the 1990 census, and most states do not have their own projections to 2030. The research team therefore considered state minority forecasts too imprecise to include them in the IAF Diabetes 2030 Model. Metropolitan statistical area population projections to 2030 came from Demographia[14] and Bizjournals.[15]

Diabetes morbidity and mortality

The CDC National Center for Health Statistics tracks visual impairment,[16] end-stage renal failure,[17] and lower extremity amputation[18] annual trends related to diabetes. Analysis of the latest available 10-year data revealed a 19% decline in the prevalence of reported visual impairment in those with diagnosed diabetes, a 26% decline in the annual incidence of new end-stage renal failure, and a 65% decline in the incidence of nontraumatic lower extremity amputations. An additional 30% decline over the 20-year period from 2010 to 2030 for each morbidity was factored in as a plausible estimate to account for anticipated increasing access and more aggressive medical management. Each minority group had different morbidity trends, which were similarly calculated and applied for total US minority projections. To calculate the percent risk of death from diabetes, the research team used annual death data published for the most recent 10 years (2000 to 2010) from the National Vital Statistic Reports.[19] A death from diabetes is defined as a death for which the underlying cause listed on the death certificate is diabetes. Plotting this trend line of annual percent incidence of death per individual with diagnosed diabetes revealed a 40% decline. The model assumes a modest additional 25% decline over the period between 2010 and 2030 to calculate deaths caused by diagnosed diabetes. Recent CDC diabetes fact sheets also include deaths for which diabetes was a contributing cause of death on the certificate. For instance, the latest data from 2010 state 69,071 death certificates listed diabetes as the cause and 234,051 death certificates listed diabetes as a contributing cause of death (almost 3.4 times higher).[2] Therefore, the projected declining percentage of those with diagnosed diabetes dying per year directly because of diabetes times this ratio provides the total number of annual deaths to which diabetes contributed. Specific death rate trends for minorities and seniors ages 65 and older also are derived from the National Vital Statistics Reports data.

The cost of diabetes

The 2014 paper by Dall et al calculated the direct medical costs and indirect economic burden of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and prediabetes for the United States and all states in 2012.[11] The research team adjusted these costs on a per person basis to 2015 dollars, and used them when projecting costs out to 2030 for the United States, all states, and selected metropolitan statistical areas.

Results

Between 2015 and 2030, the IAF Diabetes Model projects that the total number of people with type 2 and type 1 diabetes will increase by 19,629,000 to 54,913,000 people, a 54% increase. The cost of diabetes in 2015 dollars will increase to $622.3 billion, a 53% increase. Table 1 presents the data for the United States between 2015 and 2030 for the population as a whole and the 2 largest minority groups—Hispanic Americans and African Americans. National data for Asian Americans, Native Americans, and seniors ages 65 and older are available online, along with data for all 50 states and several metropolitan statistical areas.[3]
1.

US Diabetes Forecasts, 2015 to 2030

 2015202020252030
Total United States
Population321,363,000333,896,000346,407,000358,471,000
Prediabetes90,644,00097,284,000103,950,000107,713,000
Diagnosed diabetes26,019,00032,021,00037,349,00041,733,000
Undiagnosed diabetes9,625,00011,250,00012,450,00013,180,000
Total with diabetes35,644,00043,271,00049,799,00054,913,000
Complications:
 Visual impairment4,267,0005,098,0005,770,0006,260,000
 Renal failure62,02073,65082,90089,390
 Leg amputation53,86060,84065,36067,190
Annual deaths attributable to DM280,210329,260364,650385,840
Total annual cost (2015 dollars)$407.6B$490.2B$564.2B$622.3B
 Annual medical costs$312.2B$374.2B$428.9B$472.0B
 Annual nonmedical costs$95.4B$116.7B$135.3B$150.3B
Hispanic Americans
Population56,950,00063,800,00071,007,00078,700,000
Prediabetes16,063,00018,589,00021,308,00023,648,000
Diagnosed diabetes5,063,0006,845,0008,609,00010,262,000
Undiagnosed diabetes1,706,0002,150,0002,552,0002,894,000
Total with diabetes6,769,0008,995,00011,161,00013,156,000
Complications:
 Visual impairment759,400987,1001,207,1001,389,900
 Renal failure14,68019,99023,76026,890
 Leg amputation16,40021,22024,36025,910
Annual deaths attributable to DM62,00077,35089,67098,270
Total annual cost (2015 dollars)$77.7B$102.6B$127.1B$149.9B
 Annual medical costs$59.3B$77.9B$96.3B$113.4B
 Annual nonmedical costs$18.4B$24.7B$30.8B$36.5B
African Americans
Population41,010,00043,000,00043,800,00045,000,000
Prediabetes11,567,00012,528,00013,144,00013,522,000
Diagnosed diabetes4,334,0005,374,0006,158,0006,795,000
Undiagnosed diabetes1,228,0001,449,0001,574,0001,655,000
Total with diabetes5,562,0006,823,0007,732,0008,450,000
Complications:
 Visual impairment775,700952,4001,072,6001,154,500
 Renal failure16,64019,83022,23023,850
 Leg amputation14,04016,66017,43017,190
Annual deaths attributable to DM73,88084,53089,32090,640
Total annual cost (2015 dollars)$64.2B$78.3B$88.6B$96.9B
 Annual medical costs$48.8B$59.2B$66.9B$73.0B
 Annual nonmedical costs$15.4B$19.1B$21.7B$23.9B

DM, diabetes mellitus.

US Diabetes Forecasts, 2015 to 2030 DM, diabetes mellitus. Figure 1 shows 4 maps with the age-adjusted prevalence of total diabetes as a percent of the total population for every state in the United States between 2015 and 2030. It is clear that there is a wide disparity in prevalence rates among states. The increase in diabetes prevalence between 2015 and 2030 was less than 3% for Alaska, Colorado, and Utah, whereas it was more than 5% in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, and West Virginia. In 2030 this model predicts that diabetes will impact 10.2% of the total population of Utah, more than 18% in Alabama, Florida, and Mississippi, and 20.5% in West Virginia.

Prevalence of total diabetes as a percent of total population for each state for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 based on the Diabetes 2030 Model (age adjusted to standard population).

Prevalence of total diabetes as a percent of total population for each state for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 based on the Diabetes 2030 Model (age adjusted to standard population). Comparing the results from the new Diabetes 2030 Model to IAF's prior Diabetes 2025 Model reveals that there will be 1,966,700, or 4.5%, fewer people with diagnosed diabetes in 2030. Ninety-five percent of the decline is caused by the Census Bureau reducing its 2030 population projection by 15 million in the 2010 census report compared to its 2000 forecast.[12,20] The remainder of the decline is related to an adjustment for the recent leveling of the incidence trend. Additionally, in the new model there will be 1,519,800, or 10.3%, fewer people with undiagnosed diabetes because of lower undiagnosed diabetes prevalence rates. Therefore, total diabetes is projected to be 3,426,500, or 5.8%, lower using the Diabetes 2030 Model. However, prevalence of prediabetes is higher in this model, resulting in 12,581,900 more individuals with prediabetes (a 13.2% increase) in 2030.

Discussion

The process of exploring past and present data trends to ponder their implications for the future leads to several insights about the future course of diabetes if America remains on its present course. The incidence of diabetes may be leveling off. Geiss showed that although diabetes incidence more than doubled from 3.2 cases per 1000 adults in 1990 to 8.8 cases per 1000 in 2008, the incidence held steady statistically in 2012 at 7.1 cases per 1000.[6] In addition, a 2014 study looking at Framingham Heart Study data found the incidence of diabetes remained steady in the 2000s in spite of rising obesity.[7] However, the just released National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found almost 38% of American adults were obese in 2013–2014 up from almost 35% in 2011–2012, suggesting that obesity has not yet leveled off.[21] Increasing obesity may lead to increasing diabetes.[22] Therefore, it is too early to know whether the promising diabetes incidence trend toward equilibrium will continue. The IAF Diabetes 2030 Model has a steady incidence rate to prevent overestimating prevalence growth. The annual incidence of new complications related to diabetes is declining. The present study found a 26% decline in annual incidence of new end-stage renal disease related to diabetes between 1998 and 2008, a 65% decline in incidence of nontraumatic lower extremity amputation in the population with diabetes between 1999 and 2009, and a 19% decline in prevalence of reported visual impairment in those with diagnosed diabetes between 2000 and 2010. Supplementing the data from the present study, Gregg et al showed a 68% decline in the incidence of myocardial infarctions and a 53% decline in strokes in those with diabetes, in addition to a 64% decline in deaths related to hyperglycemic crisis between 1990 and 2010.[1] The annual incidence of deaths related to diabetes is declining. The present study found a 40% decline in the incidence of deaths directly caused by diabetes on the death certificate between 2000 and 2010, and the model projects a further 25% decline between 2010 and 2030. Gregg et al found that among adults with diabetes, the cardiovascular death rate declined by 40% between 1990 and 2006 and that all-cause mortality declined by 23%.[23] The declines among those with diabetes exceeded the declines among those without diabetes, resulting in a more than 50% reduction of the excess death rates attributed to diabetes. Another 2014 article by Gregg et al calculated that the number of life years lost to diabetes diagnosed at age 40 declined from 7.7 years in 1990–1999 to 5.8 years in 2000–2011 for men and from 8.7 to 6.8 years for women.[24] Management of diabetes patients is progressively improving. Multiple studies have shown that complications can be reduced significantly with intensive control of glucose, blood pressure (BP), and lipid levels in type 2 diabetes.[25,26,27,28] Medical care for people with diabetes is improving. Between 1999 and 2010, the US health care system achieved modest improvement in 5 out of 6 recommended goals for diabetes care: glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) <7.0% (7.9% improvement), BP <130/80 mmHg (11.7% improvement), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <100 mg/dl (20.8% improvement), and an annual foot exam (6.8% improvement). Unfortunately, no improvement was seen in annual eye exams, and nearly half of all patients failed to meet at least 1 recommended goal for diabetes care. Additionally only 14.3% met the target for all 3 tested measures (A1c, BP, and LDL cholesterol) plus were not smoking.[29] Several studies have shown poor adherence to medication regimens among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.[30] A 2014 study by Li et al found that during 2011–2012 only 6.8% of privately insured, newly diagnosed adults participated in Diabetes Self-Management Education and Training within the first year after diagnosis, even though it is covered by a majority of insurance plans and is strongly recommended.[31] Because participation requires a physician referral, this highlights a huge gap between a recommended guideline and current practice. Prevalence of total diabetes, associated major complications, and deaths are all increasing. In spite of the apparent stabilizing incidence of diabetes, the prevalence of total diabetes is projected to grow 54% from 35,644,000 to 54,913,000 between 2015 and 2030. Also during this time period, the annual number of people with diabetes with new end-stage renal disease will increase by 27,370, and the number of new amputations will increase by 13,330. The annual number of deaths to which diabetes contributed will rise by 106,630. A growing population is a factor, but all these numbers are growing faster than the population. Several other factors seem to be responsible[6]: (1) An aging population that, overall, is living longer will result in more people with diabetes as incidence increases dramatically in later life. (2) The significant decline in the incidence of deaths caused by diabetes means those with diabetes will be living longer, many with significant chronic comorbidities. (3) The increasing population of African Americans and Hispanic Americans, who are at higher risk of diabetes, also adds to increased prevalence of the disease. (4) Finally, the dramatic increase in type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, rising from 3% of new cases of diabetes in children pre-1990s to 45% of new cases in 2005, means more young and middle-aged adults will be living with diabetes.[32] The cost of diabetes is increasing dramatically. Between 2015 and 2030 the total costs in the United States are expected to increase from $408 billion to $622 billion, a 53% increase (Table 1). The cost of diagnosed diabetes increased by 41% between 2007 and 2012, but individual costs of diabetes care increased only 19% whereas national health care expenditures increased 24%. Therefore, increased prevalence, not increased cost per patient, is causing the increased economic burden of diabetes.[33] Also, between 2007 and 2012 the cost of prediabetes increased 74% to $44 billion, so the increasing prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes is the driving force behind the dramatically increasing economic burden of diabetes.[11] Between 1987 and 2011 prescription medications accounted for 55% of the per capita increase in medical spending for diabetes.[34] Prescription drug prices rose 10.9% in 2014 and again more than 10% in 2015.[35] In 2014, for the fourth year in a row, per person spending on diabetes drugs was higher than any other class of traditional drug, and fewer than half of diabetes prescriptions were for generic drugs.[36] Because new advanced diabetes drugs tend to be much more expensive than those replaced, it is quite possible that the medical costs of diabetes in 2030 will be significantly higher than the present study's projections.

Major initiatives are needed to turn around the growing diabetes epidemic

Diagnosed diabetes

The knowledge and treatment modalities for successfully managing diabetes are well established, but success requires a collaborative team working diligently with the patient and family to achieve optimal health. There is much room for improvement in health care delivery to obtain continuous access to care, consistently attend to all risk factors and comorbidities, and to help patients succeed in compliance with medications and healthy living.

Undiagnosed diabetes

One in 4 Americans with diabetes do not know that they have it, but it can lead to life-threatening complications.[2] Current screening criteria fail to detect more than 50% of undiagnosed diabetes.[33] The recent final diabetes screening guideline from the US Preventive Services Task Force, published October 27, 2015, expands the population of adults recommended for screening from only those with hypertension (2008 guideline) to all adults ages 40 to 70 years who are overweight or obese.[37] Wide dissemination and implementation of these screening criteria, even though they are more restrictive than American Diabetes Association guidelines, should help identify a much greater percentage of those adults with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes.

Prediabetes

The research team forecasts that the number of Americans with prediabetes will climb from 90.6 million in 2015 to 107.7 million in 2030. This increased prevalence means 30% of all Americans and 51% of all seniors would have prediabetes. Currently only about 10% of those adults with prediabetes are aware of their condition, and without effective intervention, up to a third of them will go on to develop diabetes within 5 years.[38] Programs such as the Diabetes Prevention Program clinical trial have shown that intensive lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of going on to develop type 2 diabetes by 58% in overweight or obese adults with prediabetes.[35] The best solution for turning around the diabetes epidemic is preventing prediabetes and its progression to diabetes in the first place. Achieving such an outcome calls for addressing underlying societal risk factors that can contribute to unhealthy lifestyles, and would require a “population-wide” approach that addresses health promotion, obesity prevention, and creates a physical, cultural, and psychological environment that supports healthy living naturally. This outcome could not be achieved by individual health providers and patients alone, but requires integrated systems of care incentivized for desired health outcomes. It also would require a political will for effective policies and commitment of the public at all levels. These strategies are mutually reinforcing and may have a greater impact if addressed at the state and local levels.

Limitations

There were several limitations in this analysis. Forecasting 15 years into the future carries the caveat: if current trends do not change. Technological advances follow a general pattern, but sometimes there can be profound and unexpected shifts. People tend to be largely resistant to change, especially health behavior change. Unexpected cultural shifts and other factors prompting change are possible. The research team has been consistent in using CDC statistics, the basic Boyle et al (CDC) 2050 projection model and the Dall et al cost model. In some cases, ideal data are not available, especially regarding minorities. In addition, excellent research from different studies at times reaches quite different conclusions. The research team has been explicit about the assumptions they have made, and have been conservative in their forecasts of future trends.

Conclusions

To support efforts at public awareness, and the work of health professionals and policy makers at many levels, the research team has updated projections out to 2030 for the United States, all 50 states, and many metropolitan areas, and made them freely available online. The team finds that in spite of medical advances and prevention efforts, diabetes presents a major health crisis in terms of prevalence, morbidity, and costs, and that this crisis will worsen significantly over the next 15 years. It is important to enhance screening, education, and support efforts at the local, state, and federal levels to appropriately screen for diabetes and prediabetes. Also, in addition to effective management for all those with diabetes, success will require aggressive efforts to identify adults with prediabetes and to intervene to help them prevent or delay the progression to type 2 diabetes in the first place. Another daunting challenge in preventing diabetes and prediabetes is changing cultural norms and societal behavior and structures in order to support healthy living. Aggressive efforts are urgently needed if we want to significantly reduce the diabetes epidemic by 2030.
  20 in total

1.  Screening for Abnormal Blood Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  The global spread of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Orit Pinhas-Hamiel; Philip Zeitler
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Mohammed K Ali; Kai McKeever Bullard; Jinan B Saaddine; Catherine C Cowie; Giuseppina Imperatore; Edward W Gregg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

5.  Associations between trends in race/ethnicity, aging, and body mass index with diabetes prevalence in the United States: a series of cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  Andy Menke; Keith F Rust; Judith Fradkin; Yiling J Cheng; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter Gaede; Pernille Vedel; Nicolai Larsen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Oluf Pedersen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Effect of intensive diabetes management on macrovascular events and risk factors in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Trends in diabetes incidence: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Tobin M Abraham; Karol M Pencina; Michael J Pencina; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The alarming and rising costs of diabetes and prediabetes: a call for action!

Authors:  William T Cefalu; Matthew P Petersen; Robert E Ratner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes--United States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Rui Li; Sundar S Shrestha; Ruth Lipman; Nilka R Burrows; Leslie E Kolb; Stephanie Rutledge
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  149 in total

1.  Comparison of Insulins Glargine and Degludec in Diabetic Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) with CGM Devices.

Authors:  Samantha C Puglisi; Alexis L Mackiewicz; Amir Ardeshir; Laura M Garzel; Kari L Christe
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Secreted MG53 From Striated Muscle Impairs Systemic Insulin Sensitivity.

Authors:  Lenan Zhuang; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Current Challenges and New Hope.

Authors:  Efstratios Koutroumpakis; David Aguilar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Development and Validation of PREDICT-DM: A New Microsimulation Model to Project and Evaluate Complications and Treatments of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Pooyan Kazemian; Deborah J Wexler; Naomi F Fields; Robert A Parker; Amy Zheng; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  The Longitudinal Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Glycemic Control in Elderly Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Rebekah J Walker; Emma Garacci; Anna Palatnik; Mukoso N Ozieh; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Leisure-Time Running Reduces the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Yuehan Wang; Duck-Chul Lee; Angelique G Brellenthin; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Carl J Lavie; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Updates from the Evidence Base Examining Association between Periodontal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Current Status and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Ingrid Glurich; Amit Acharya
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Addressing Comorbidities in Heart Failure: Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, and Diabetes.

Authors:  Aakash Bavishi; Ravi B Patel
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 9.  Immune System: An Emerging Player in Mediating Effects of Endocrine Disruptors on Metabolic Health.

Authors:  Amita Bansal; Jorge Henao-Mejia; Rebecca A Simmons
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 10.  Epigenetics Variation and Pathogenesis in Diabetes.

Authors:  Haichen Zhang; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.