| Literature DB >> 27123478 |
David Lewis-Smith1, Kimberli J Kamer1, Helen Griffin1, Anne-Marie Childs1, Karen Pysden1, Denis Titov1, Jennifer Duff1, Angela Pyle1, Robert W Taylor1, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man1, Venkateswaran Ramesh1, Rita Horvath1, Vamsi K Mootha1, Patrick F Chinnery1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To define the mechanism responsible for fatigue, lethargy, and weakness in 2 cousins who had a normal muscle biopsy.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27123478 PMCID: PMC4830195 DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Genet ISSN: 2376-7839
Figure 1Pedigree of the family described in the case report
IV:3 is the index case and IV:6 is her cousin. DNA was available for family members indicated with an asterisk, allowing the segregation analysis shown in figure 2. The 2 gray-shaded individuals have not been assessed in the United Kingdom: 1 failed to walk and died in infancy and the other is reported to have muscle problems.
Figure 2Identification of the deletion
(A) Exome read depth across MICU1 for the 2 patients (IV:3 = patient 1, red; IV:6 = patient 2, yellow) and a representative control (blue) showing a likely homozygous deletion involving exon 1 in IV:3 and IV:6. (B) Long-range PCR primer walking demonstrated the limits of the deletion within the region identified through analysis of exome sequencing coverage (oligonucleotide primers shown as red and green bars). PCR amplification using the named primer pairs shows absence of a product with combination 74,387,000. − = no DNA control, + = healthy control. (C) Long-range PCR using the forward primer from pair 74,384,500 and the reverse primer from pair 74,388,250 amplified a ∼1-kb fragment from the 2 affected cousins, which was small enough for Sanger sequencing. Primers: Fwd TTCCCTTTCTCCTCAGGCAC, Rev GTCTACCGGATTCAGGCGAT. When compared with control DNA, this equated to a ∼2.7-kb homozygous deletion in the patients. (D) Sanger sequence from the 2 affected cousins (IV:3 and IV:6) showing the homozygous deletion breakpoint. Primers: Fwd TTCCCTTTCTCCTCAGGCAC, Rev GTCTACCGGATTCAGGCGAT. (E) Segregation analysis of the MICU1 deletion. PCR spanning the breakpoint showing the homozygous deletion in the 2 affected cousins (IV:3 and IV:6) and a heterozygous deletion in other family members (III:2, III:3, III:4, III:5, and IV:2). Primers: Fwd CCTGGGCGACAAGTGTAAAA Position Chr 10:74,381,222; Rev CCCAGGCATTTGATCACCAG Position Chr 10:74,390,095. Amplification of the mutant allele in heterozygous carriers of the MICU1 deletion produced an additional intermediate band of ∼8 kb that is unexplained but did not affect the segregation analysis. Other symbols refer to the pedigree shown in figure 1. WT = wild type.
Figure 3Loss of MICU1 leads to a deficit in mitochondrial calcium handling without impairing respiration
(A) Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) and (B) extracellular acidification rates (ECAR) of MICU1+/− and MICU1−/− fibroblasts were measured by Seahorse XF analysis. Mean values ± SE (error bars) from 3 independent experiments are shown (differences are not statistically significant). (C) Immunoblot of whole cell lysates from MICU1+/− and MICU1−/− fibroblasts. (D) Digitonin-permeabilized fibroblasts were given a pulse of 35 μM CaCl2 while monitoring extramitochondrial Ca2+ with calcium green-5N.[8] (E) Quantification of the rate of calcium uptake from calcium uptake traces including those in D (using linear fit from 30 to 40 seconds). Mean values ± SD (error bars) from 3 independent experiments are shown. (F) MICU1+/− (+) and MICU1−/− (−) fibroblasts were exposed to different conditions (untreated, 500 nM CCCP, 1 μM oligomycin, or serum starvation) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and phosphorylated PDH (at S293) were measured by immunoblot after lysing the cells in 1% Triton-X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Hepes pH 7.4, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors. (G) Quantification of 3 independent experiments including the representative experiment in F are shown. Mean values ± SE (error bars). MCU = mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter; SDHB = succinate dehydrogenase subunit B.