| Literature DB >> 27123314 |
Bing Xie1, Ming Liang2, Da-Peng Zhou1, Wen Zhao1, Jing-Yang Sun2, Jing-Jing Rong2, Jing Tian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pelvic fracture combined with massive bleeding (PFCMB) is a complex issue in clinical practice. Currently, the use of angiography and embolization for the treatment of PFCMB obtains good results. The aim of this study is to observe the effects of early internal iliac artery embolization on the SIRS in dogs with simulated-pelvic-fracture combined with massive bleeding.Entities:
Keywords: Internal iliac artery embolization; Interventional treatment cabin; Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Year: 2016 PMID: 27123314 PMCID: PMC4847365 DOI: 10.1186/s40779-016-0085-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mil Med Res ISSN: 2054-9369
Fig. 1Incidence of SIRS and mortality within 24 h for the two groups. a Incidence of SIRS within 24 h between the 2 groups. b Mortality of SIRS animals within 24 h between the 2 groups
Comparisons of vital signs between the two groups
| Group | MAP (mmHg) | HR (t/min) | RR (t/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | Pre-modeling | 145.2 ± 11.2 | 190.5 ± 9.7 | 16.7 ± 3.5 |
| 0 h post-modeling | 139.5 ± 9.6 | 210.9 ± 11.4 | 35.5 ± 5.4 | |
| 2 h post-modeling | 110.4 ± 8.5 | 229.7 ± 10.5 | 38.5 ± 3.6 | |
| 4 h post-modeling | 97.2 ± 7.5 | 230.2 ± 9.7 | 39.2 ± 2.8 | |
| 8 h post-modeling | 85.2 ± 10.3 | 260.5 ± 11.5 | 42.6 ± 7.3 | |
| EG | Pre-modeling | 139.6 ± 16.1 | 201.1 ± 10.2 | 17.9 ± 2.9 |
| 0 h post-modeling | 142.7 ± 8.5 | 217.8 ± 11.2 | 38.2 ± 9.4 | |
| 2 h post-modeling | 117.2 ± 9.6 | 210.5 ± 7.9 | 27.5 ± 5.5 | |
| 4 h post-modeling | 115.6 ± 5.3* | 195.8 ± 5.8* | 29.3 ± 9.6* | |
| 8 h post-modeling | 102.8 ± 5.8* | 200.6 ± 11.3* | 25.5 ± 6.9* | |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD
CG Control group, EG Embolization group, MAP Mean arterial pressure, HR Heart rate, RR Respiratory rate
* P < 0.05 compared with CG group at the same time point; P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F MAP (embolization) =12.61 and F RR (embolization × time) =20.52
Blood indices comparisons between the two groups
| Index | Group | Pre-modeling | Post-modeling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 8 h | |||
| WBC | CG | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 12.7 ± 3.4 | 17.8 ± 5.1 | 18.6 ± 9.3 | 19.1 ± 9.1 |
| EG | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 11.8 ± 5.7 | 13.6 ± 7.2 | 14.7 ± 8.2 | 14.9 ± 6.3 | |
|
| 1.52 | 2.81 | 1.99 | 1.28 | 2.08 | |
|
| 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.21 | |
| HGB | CG | 152.2 ± 12.6 | 129.1 ± 6.2 | 102.3 ± 1.2 | 92.1 ± 4.5 | 84.7 ± 9.2 |
| EG | 148.1 ± 9.7 | 131.3 ± 4.5 | 121.4 ± 6.3 | 112.6 ± 7.1 | 101.2 ± 8.1 | |
|
| 1.69 | 1.89 | 5.56 | 17.22 | 8.29 | |
|
| 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.0003 | 0.008 | |
| PLT | CG | 188.4 ± 11.7 | 185.5 ± 7.1 | 192.4 ± 9.2 | 290.5 ± 6.5 | 257.1 ± 4.5 |
| EG | 189.9 ± 16.3 | 189.5 ± 9.3 | 190.4 ± 11.3 | 291.4 ± 8.7 | 272.3 ± 11.7 | |
|
| 1.94 | 1.71 | 1.51 | 1.79 | 5.76 | |
|
| 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.06 | |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F HGB (embolization × time) = 164.77, F HGB (time) = 12.61, and F PLT (embolization) = 7.33
CG Control group, EG Embolization group, WBC White blood cell, HGB Hemoglobin, PLT Blood platelet
Blood gas analysis comparison between the two groups
| Index | Group | Pre-modeling | Post-modeling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 8 h | |||
| pH value | CG | 7.34 ± 0.04 | 7.29 ± 0.06 | 7.27 ± 0.03 | 7.22 ± 0.04 | 7.16 ± 0.03 |
| EG | 7.32 ± 0.03 | 7.33 ± 0.05 | 7.27 ± 0.04 | 7.25 ± 0.04 | 7.22 ± 0.03 | |
|
| 1.78 | 1.44 | 1.78 | 1.11 | 8.58 | |
|
| 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.79 | 0.0067 | |
| PaO2 | CG | 120.4 ± 5.7 | 112.4 ± 6.9 | 100.5 ± 5.4 | 108.5 ± 6.1 | 111.3 ± 7.1 |
| EG | 121.6 ± 6.1 | 114.6 ± 7.2 | 105.2 ± 7.7 | 111.5 ± 4.7 | 109.3 ± 6.4 | |
|
| 1.15 | 1.09 | 2.03 | 1.68 | 1.23 | |
|
| 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.62 | |
| PaCO2 | CG | 40.5 ± 3.8 | 47.6 ± 5.6 | 35.2 ± 6.1 | 38.6 ± 5.9 | 43.3 ± 5.7 |
| EG | 41.2 ± 5.7 | 42.8 ± 3.7 | 40.7 ± 5.4 | 45.6 ± 6.1 | 45.8 ± 6.3 | |
|
| 2.25 | 2.29 | 1.28 | 1.07 | 1.22 | |
|
| 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.66 | |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F PH-value(embolization) = 54.18, F PH-value(time) = 6.71, F PH-value(embolization × time) = 95.24, and F PaCO2 (time) = 32.45
CG Control group, EG Embolization group
Comparison of levels of alkaline phosphatase between the two groups
| Group | 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 8 h | 24 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 57.1 ± 3.1 | 128.5 ± 6.2 | 169.3 ± 5.7 | 238.5 ± 7.1 | 264.2 ± 6.7 |
| EG | 56.9 ± 4.3 | 77.6 ± 3.4 | 82.3 ± 2.9 | 149.6 ± 3.3 | 168.7 ± 2.8 |
|
| 3.12 | 6.29 | 6.97 | 7.57 | 8.22 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.005 |
CG Control group, EG Embolization group
The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA, F(embolization) = 14.37, F(time) = 81.14, and F(embolization × time) = 232.45