Literature DB >> 27120786

IDH-1R132H mutation status in diffuse glioma patients: implications for classification.

Peng-Fei Wang1, Ning Liu1, Hong-Wang Song1, Kun Yao2, Tao Jiang1,3,4,5, Shou-Wei Li1, Chang-Xiang Yan1.   

Abstract

WHO2007 grading of diffuse gliomas in adults is well-established. However, IDH mutations make classification of gliomas according to the WHO2007 edition controversial. Here, we characterized IDH-1R132H mut status in a cohort of 670 adult patients with different WHO2007 grades of diffuse glioma. Patient characteristics, clinical data and prognoses were obtained from medical records. Patients with IDH-1R132H mut were younger and had better clinical outcomes than those without mutations. Differences in age among patients with astrocytomas of different WHO2007 grades were eliminated after patients were grouped based on IDH-1R132H status. IDH-1R132H mut was present more often in patients with lower Ki-67 and MGMT protein levels and higher mutant p53 levels. Ki-67 was also strongly associated with WHO2007 grade independently of IDH-1R132H mut status. Moreover, patients with Ki-67<30 survived longer than those with Ki-67≥30, regardless of IDH-1R132H mut status. Patients in the IDH-1R132H mut group with lower MGMT protein levels also had better clinical outcomes than those in other groups. Our results indicate that to better treat gliomas, IDH mutation status should be included when determining WHO2007 grade in glioma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IDH-1R132H mutation; Ki-67; gliomas; molecular pathology; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27120786      PMCID: PMC5058765          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors, accounting for 31% of all central nervous system tumors and 81% of malignant CNS tumors [1], and are classified into grades from I to IV on the basis of histopathological and clinical criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. Grade I gliomas are often circumscribed and generally curable with surgical resection alone [1, 2]. In contrast, Grade II and III gliomas are invasive and progress to higher grade lesions, with a poor prognosis [1, 2]. Glioblastomas, which are WHO grade IV gliomas, are traditionally classified as either primary or secondary if they developed from lower-grade gliomas [2]. Analyzing the specific genetic characteristics of gliomas has improved the understanding of glioma genesis and predictions of prognosis, and allows for the use of targeted treatments on an individual basis [3, 4]. IDH (Isocitrate Dehydrogenase) mutations are among the most common gene alterations in gliomas. Mutations in IDH genes occur in up to 80% of astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, oligoastrocytomas, and secondary glioblastomas, and in less than 10% of primary glioblastomas [5, 6], indicating that this mutation plays a key role in early gliomatogenesis [7]. Patients with grade II, III, or IV gliomas carrying IDH mutations have better overall survival [4, 8]. Additionally, accounting for IDH mutation status eliminates age differences in the prevalence of different WHO2007 grade gliomas [9, 10]. These results indicate that additional characteristics in addition to WHO2007 grade should be considered when classifying gliomas. Studies of IDH-1 mutations are frequently based on DNA sequencing, a method which is usually considered robust. However, the IDH1 R132H antibody (clone H09) is more convenient, reliable, and consistent for the detection of IDH1R132H protein, and is widely used in clinical diagnosis and research [11-15]. In this study, in addition to IDH-1R132H mut protein levels, Ki-67 index and mutant P53 and MGMT (O (6)-methylguanineDNA methyltransferase) protein levels were explored in a cohort of glioma patients from a single institution in China. The predictive value of IDH-1R132H mut levels for glioma patient prognosis was also investigated in this study.

RESULTS

IDH-1 R132H mutations in various histological types

We analyzed the distribution of IDH1R132H mut in 33 astrocytomas (A), 41 oligodendrogliomas (O), and 82 oligoastrocytomas (OA). The IDH1R132H mutation was present less often in A, at 60.6%, than in O or OA (87.8% and 84.1% respectively, p=0.006) (Table 1). We also investigated the presence of IDH1R132H mut in 126 anaplastic gliomas, including 32 anaplastic astrocytomas, 39 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, and 55 anaplastic oligoastrocytomas. The distribution of IDH-1 mutation did not differ among the anaplastic glioma subtypes (Table 1). There were 300 primary glioblastomas (pGBM), 62 secondary glioblastomas (sGBM), and 26 glioblastomas with an oligodendroglioma component (GBMO). The rate of IDH-1R132H mut was 6.3% in pGBM, lower than that in sGBM (71.0%, p<0.001) and GBMO (46.2%, p<0.001). IDH-1R132H mut was also more frequent in sGBM than in GBMO (p<0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of IDH-1 R132H mutation in different grades of glioma

WHO2007 gradetotalGender (F/M)Age (median), rangeAge (mean) ± SEMp valueIDH-1R132H mutp value
II15668/8838, 20-7038.54 ± 0.77125 (80.1%)
A3313/2039, 20-6139.76 ± 1.9520 (60.6%)
O4120/2138, 20-7038.07 ± 1.300.71536 (87.8%)0.006
OA8235/4737.5, 20-5638.29 ± 1.0769 (84.1%)
III12659/6744, 18-7243.13 ± 1.0972 (57.1%)
AA3215/1742, 18-7242.75 ± 2.3017 (53.1%)
AO3919/2047, 18-6544.62 ± 1.950.65525 (64.1%)0.567
AOA5525/3042, 19-6942.31 ± 1.6030 (54.5%)
IV388142/24651, 18-8251.47 ± 0.7675 (19.3%)
pGBM300109/19153, 18-8251.47 ± 0.7619 (6.3%)
sGBM6223/3944.5, 18-7143.69 ± 1.400.00044 (71.0%)0.000
GMBO2610/1647.5, 23-6648.23 ± 2.2912 (46.2%)

IDH1 R132H mutations and age

The 272 patients carrying IDH-1 R132H mut were younger than the 398 patients without the mutation (39.79 ± 0.61 vs. 50.33 ± 0.66 years, p<0.001) (Table 2). The association between IDH-1R132H mutation and younger age in astrocytic tumors contributed to this difference (Table 2). Furthermore, we analyzed age differences in patients with astrocytic neoplasms. Patients with pGBM (51.47 ± 0.76, n=300) were older than those with AA (42.75 ± 2.30, n=32; p=0.001) or A (39.76 ± 1.95, n=33; p<0.001). Patients with AA also tended to be older than those with A, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no differences in age among patients with A, AA, or pGBM in either the IDH-1R132H-wt (p=0.347) or IDH-1R132H-mut (p=0.062) groups.
Table 2

Relationship between age and IDH-1 R132H mutation in gliomas

WHO2007 GradeIDH-1R132H mutIDH-1R132H wtp value
mean ± SEM, yearsmedian, rangemean ± SEM, yearsmedian, range
Total39.79 ± 0.61 (n=272)40, 20-7050.33 ± 0.66 (n=398)52, 18-820.000
II37.58 ± 0.82 (n=125)37, 20-7042.45 ± 1.89 (n=31)44, 20-610.011
A34.05 ± 1.98 (n=20)34, 20-5548.54 ± 2.35 (n=13)49, 32-610.000
O38.22 ± 1.30 (n=36)38, 26-7037.00 ± 5.70 (n=5)43, 20-490.844
OA38.26 ± 1.18 (n=69)37, 20-5638.46 ± 2.48 (n=13)40, 26-540.946
III41.08 ± 1.22 (n=72)41, 20-6545.87 ± 1.90 (n=54)46.50, 18-720.029
AA37.88 ± 2.16 (n=17)38, 20-5148.27 ± 3.87 (n=15)50, 18-720.022
AO45.52 ± 2.16 (n=25)46, 26-6543.00 ± 3.92 (n=14)48.5, 18-650.543
AOA39.20 ± 1.80 (n=30)39.5, 20-5946.04 ± 2.63 (n=25)45, 19-690.032
IV42.24 ± 1.19 (n=75)42, 22-6351.88 ± 0.73 (n=313)53, 18-820.000
pGBM41.58 ± 2.57 (n=19)40, 22-6352.14 ± 0.78 (n=281)54, 18-820.001
sGBM41.77 ± 1.45 (n=44)42, 23-6148.39 ± 3.06 (n=18)49, 18-710.030
GBMO45.00 ± 3.43 (n=12)44.5, 23-6351.00 ± 2.99 (n=14)51, 32-660.197

IDH-1 R132H mutation and other molecular markers

As shown in Table 3, 68.0% (185/272) and 32.0% (87/272) of the IDH-1 R132H-mut and IDH-1 R132H-wt groups, respectively, had Ki-67<30. A, O, and OA patients with lower WHO grades also tended to have Ki-67<30, independent of IDH status. Mutant p53 was more prevalent in the IDH-1 R132H mut group (55.9%, 152/272) than in the IDH-1 R132H wt group (23.9%, 95/398). However, mutant p53 was only present in grade II-III astrocytomas. Decreased MGMT protein levels were observed more often in IDH-1 R132H-mut patients than in IDH-1 R132H-wt patients (76.1% vs. 58.8%, p<0.001). However, there was no consistent relationship between MGMT proteins level and IDH-1R132H status within any of the individual glioma subtypes (Table 3).
Table 3

Co-occurrence of IDH-1 R132H mutation and other molecular markers

GliomaKi-67p valuep53 mutp valueMGMTp value
<30≥30LHLH
IDH-1R132H mut185870.0001201520.000207650.000
IDH-1R132H wt14924930395234164
IDH-1R132H mutA2000.0004160.0171640.924
AA125314134
pGBM613118145
IDH-1R132H wtA1300.000940.003850.718
AA877878
pGBM8120023249156125
IDH-1R132H mutO3600.0003240.0903060.616
AO169187214
OA69027425811
IDH-1R132H mutAOA15150.0009210.6032190.067
GBMO483975
IDH-1R132H wtOA1300.001760.103941.000
AOA1312916178
GBMO104104104

IDH-1 R132H mutation and prognosis

Follow-up data was available for 165 pGBM, 50 sGBM, 22 GBMO, 14 AA, 28 AO, 47 AOA, 13OA, 30 O, and 2 A patients. In multivariate analysis, we found that increased IDH-1R132H mut, low MGMT levels, and Ki-67<30 were associated with better prognosis.

IDH-1R132H mutation and Ki-67<30

IDH-1R132H mutation was associated with better prognosis [median 58.700 months (95% CI 23.946–93.454) vs. 15.370 months in wild-type patients (95% CI 13.190–17.550); p<0.001, Breslow test]. The median OS of 36.230 months (95% CI 31.103–41.357) in patients with Ki-67<30 was higher than the OS of 15.370 months (95% CI 12.842–17.898) in patients with Ki-67≥30 (p<0.001, Kaplan-Meier method and Breslow test). We subdivided IDH-1R132H mut or IDH-1R132H wt gliomas based on Ki-67<30, and found differences in mOS among the four groups (Figure 1a). Patients with Ki-67<30 had better prognoses, regardless of whether they had IDH-1 R132H-mut [(median not reached) vs. 19.000 months (95% CI 13.754–24.246); p<0.001, Breslow test, Figure 1b] or IDH-1R132H wt [median 17.400 months (95% CI 13.627–21.173) vs. 13.270 months (95% CI 11.141–15.399); p=0.039, Breslow test, Figure 1c]. However, OS did not differ between IDH-1R132H mut/Ki-67≥30 and IDH-1R132H wt /Ki-67<30 patients (p=0.751, Breslow test).
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Breslow tests for IDH-1R132H mut and Ki-67≥30 in diffuse gliomas

Patient were separated into groups based on IDH-1R132H mut and Ki-67 index; clinical outcomes differed among the groups a. Ki-67<30 was associated with longer overall survival in both IDH-1R132H mut b. and IDH-1R132H wt c. patients.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Breslow tests for IDH-1R132H mut and Ki-67≥30 in diffuse gliomas

Patient were separated into groups based on IDH-1R132H mut and Ki-67 index; clinical outcomes differed among the groups a. Ki-67<30 was associated with longer overall survival in both IDH-1R132H mut b. and IDH-1R132H wt c. patients.

IDH-1R132H mutation and MGMT

The mOS of 15.670 months (95% CI 13.273–18.067) in MGMT-positive patients was shorter than the mOS of 32.500 months (95% CI 22.439–42.561) observed in MGMT-negative patients (p<0.001, Breslow test). Furthermore, mOS differed among IDH-1R132H-mut-MGMTneg (58.700 months, 95% CI 31.437–85.963), IDH-1R132H mut-MGMTpos (19.570 months, 95% CI 11.018-28.122), IDH-1R132H wt-MGMTneg (16.300 months, 95% CI 13.188–19.412) and IDH-1R132H-WT-MGMTpos (13.830 months, 95% CI 11.019-16.641) patients (p<0.001, Breslow test, Figure 2a). MGMTneg patients in the IDH-1R132H mut group (p=0.006, Breslow test, Figure 2b), but not in the IDH-1R132H wt group (p=0.102, Breslow test, Figure 2c), had a much better prognosis than MGMTpos patients. No difference was observed in OS between IDH-1R132H-mut-MGMTpos and IDH-1R132H-WT-MGMTneg patients (p=0.471, Breslow test).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Breslow tests for IDH-1R132H mut and MGMT proteins in diffuse gliomas

Overall survival differed depending on IDH-1R132H mut status and MGMT protein levels a. Lower MGMT levels were associated with better clinical outcomes in IDH-1 R132H mut b. but not in IDH-1R132H wt c. patients.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Breslow tests for IDH-1R132H mut and MGMT proteins in diffuse gliomas

Overall survival differed depending on IDH-1R132H mut status and MGMT protein levels a. Lower MGMT levels were associated with better clinical outcomes in IDH-1 R132H mut b. but not in IDH-1R132H wt c. patients.

DISCUSSION

The most frequent IDH-1 mutation type in glioma is R132H, which accounts for 88.2%-92.7% of mutations in this gene [16-18]. In an IHC study specifically detecting IDH-1R132H mut using the H09 antibody, the rates were 83.0% in A II, 90.0% in O II, 100% OA II, 81.0% in A III, 88.0% in O III, 87.5% in OA III, 4% in glioblastoma, and 71.4% in sGBM [14]. The frequency of IDH-1 mutations ranged from 4-7.6% in primary glioblastoma and 73-88% in secondary glioblastoma [19, 20]. The IDH-1 R132H mutation rates detected here are similar to the ranges published previously [14, 17, 19, 21]. Also in agreement with previous findings, patients harboring IDH-1R132H mut in all grades of glioma in our study were younger than those without the mutation [6, 17, 22, 23]. Moreover, IDH-1R132H mut was present much more frequently in younger A, AA, AOA, pGBM, and sGBM patients. Other studies suggest a strong association between age and the prevalence of all WHO2007 glioma subtypes [6, 17]. In this regard, the differences between our findings and previous studies were likely due, at least in part, to small numbers of patients with particular gliomas subtypes examined here. A II IDHmut and A III IDHmut patients did not differ in age in a previous study [9]. While patients with A III were older than those with A II in our study, both groups were significantly younger than those with pGBM. However, there were no differences in patient age after they were separated based on IDH-1R132H mut. Thus, the differences in age associated with different WHO2007 grades may be strongly influenced by IDH-1R132H mut status. Previous studies suggested a strong correlation between IDH mutations and lower Ki-67 index, mutant p53 levels, and MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas [10, 16, 19, 24–26]. Here, we found that lower Ki-67 was associated with IDHR132H mut in all WHO2007 glioma subtypes. However, mutant p53 expression in astrocytic tumors only differed after patients were grouped based on IDH-1R132H mutation status. It is well-established that IDH mutations are associated with MGMT promoter methylation [10, 26–28]. In the present study, an association between IDH-1R132H mut and MGMT protein levels was observed in glioma overall, but not within the glioma subtypes. These differences may be due to differences in the sensitivity of the detection methods [26, 29]. However, our results indicate that combining IDH-1R132H status with Ki-67 index and mutant p53 and MGMT protein levels could improve prognosis predictions in glioma patients. Recent data suggests that IDH-1 mutations, Ki-67 index, and MGMT protein levels are prognostic factors for diffuse gliomas [15, 20, 22, 24, 30–32]. Cai et al. found that IDH-wt plus Ki-67-low and IDH-wt plus Ki-67-high astrocytic tumor patients had different clinical outcomes. The cutoff for Ki-67 in their study was 10%, and median survival was about 2 years in Ki-67-low and 1 year Ki-67-high patients [32]. Zeng et al. observed that Ki-67≥30 was associated with worse prognosis in both IDH mut (median OS=566 days) and IDH wt (median OS=355 days) groups. The median OS in our study was closer to that found by Zeng et al. These results indicate that Ki-67 index is a reliable candidate for determining prognosis in glioma patients in addition to IDH-1 status. Although the prognostic value of MGMT protein levels is controversial [29], we found here that they were predictive of prognosis. Different IHC detection thresholds may help explain this discrepancy. In summary, we characterized the expression of IDH-1R132H mut in a large cohort of glioma patients. IDH-1R132H mut was associated with specific WHO2007 histological grades and younger age. Age differences between different WHO2007 grades of astrocytoma were strongly influenced by IDH-1R132H mutation status. Low Ki-67 index values occurred much more often in patients with lower WHO2007 grades and IDH-1R132H mutation. Finally, our study indicated that Ki-67 index and MGMT protein levels, together with IDH mutation status, were predictive of prognosis in different glioma subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tumor samples

Tumor samples were obtained from Sanbo Brain Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the study. All experiments using human tissues were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sanbo Brain Hospital. 670 adult patients with diffuse supratentorial gliomas were involved in the study. WHO classification of all specimens was performed by two independent neuropathologists [2]. In the case of a discrepancy, the two observers simultaneously reviewed the slides until a consensus was achieved. Clinical data, including patients’ age at diagnosis, sex, and molecular pathology, were collected. The diagnosis of GBMO (glioblastoma with an oligodendroglioma component) was made as previously described [33]. OS (overall survival) was measured from the date of operation to the death or the last known follow-up.

Evaluation of IDH-1R132H mut, MGMT, mutant P53, and Ki-67 levels by immunohistochemistry

Experimental procedures were performed as described previously [34-36]. Primary antibodies against IDH1R132H (Dianova 1:100), p53 (1:100 Invitrogen), MGMT (1:150 Invitrogen), and Ki-67 (1:200 Invitrogen) were used. The cutoff values were 10% for IDH-1R132H mut, 10% for mutant p53, 10% for MGMT, and 30% for Ki-67. Representative images of high and low IDH-1R132H mut (Figure 3a, 3b), Ki-67 (Figure 3c, 3d), mutant p53 (Figure 3e, 3f), and MGMT protein (Figure 3g, 3h) levels in glioblastoma patients are shown.
Figure 3

Examples of IDH-1R132H mut, Ki-67 index, and mutant p53 and MGMT protein levels in glioblastomas

IDH-1R132H mut positive a. and negative b. Ki-67 50%-60% c. and 20% d. mutant p53 positive e. and negative f. MGMT positive g. and negative f.

Examples of IDH-1R132H mut, Ki-67 index, and mutant p53 and MGMT protein levels in glioblastomas

IDH-1R132H mut positive a. and negative b. Ki-67 50%-60% c. and 20% d. mutant p53 positive e. and negative f. MGMT positive g. and negative f.

Statistics

SPSS 22.0 was used for all statistical analyses. The χ2 test was applied to assess the co-occurrence of IDH-1 mutation patient characteristics or the presence of other disease biomarkers. Survival curves were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Breslow test. A p<0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant.
  36 in total

1.  Malignant clinical features of anaplastic gliomas without IDH mutation.

Authors:  Ichiyo Shibahara; Yukihiko Sonoda; Takuhiro Shoji; Masayuki Kanamori; Ryuta Saito; Tomoo Inoue; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Yoji Yamashita; Takashi Watanabe; Toshihiro Kumabe; Mika Watanabe; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  ATRX and IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry with subsequent copy number analysis and IDH sequencing as a basis for an "integrated" diagnostic approach for adult astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and glioblastoma.

Authors:  David E Reuss; Felix Sahm; Daniel Schrimpf; Benedikt Wiestler; David Capper; Christian Koelsche; Leonille Schweizer; Andrey Korshunov; David T W Jones; Volker Hovestadt; Michel Mittelbronn; Jens Schittenhelm; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Platten; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Immunohistochemical profiles of IDH1, MGMT and P53: practical significance for prognostication of patients with diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ogura; Yoshihiro Tsukamoto; Manabu Natsumeda; Mizuho Isogawa; Hiroshi Aoki; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Seiichi Yoshida; Kouichiro Okamoto; Hitoshi Takahashi; Yukihiko Fujii; Akiyoshi Kakita
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 1.906

4.  Integrated DNA methylation and copy-number profiling identify three clinically and biologically relevant groups of anaplastic glioma.

Authors:  Benedikt Wiestler; David Capper; Martin Sill; David T W Jones; Volker Hovestadt; Dominik Sturm; Christian Koelsche; Anna Bertoni; Leonille Schweizer; Andrey Korshunov; Elisa K Weiß; Maximilian G Schliesser; Alexander Radbruch; Christel Herold-Mende; Patrick Roth; Andreas Unterberg; Christian Hartmann; Torsten Pietsch; Guido Reifenberger; Peter Lichter; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Michael Platten; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  MGMT CpG island is invariably methylated in adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations.

Authors:  Shani Mulholland; Danita M Pearson; Rifat A Hamoudi; Deborah S Malley; Caroline M Smith; Jamie M J Weaver; David T W Jones; Sylvia Kocialkowski; L Magnus Bäcklund; V Peter Collins; Koichi Ichimura
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.316

Review 7.  Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in gliomas.

Authors:  Magdalena Megova; Jiri Drabek; Vladimira Koudelakova; Radek Trojanec; Ondrej Kalita; Marian Hajduch
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.433

8.  ATRX mRNA expression combined with IDH1/2 mutational status and Ki-67 expression refines the molecular classification of astrocytic tumors: evidence from the whole transcriptome sequencing of 169 samples samples.

Authors:  Jinquan Cai; Pei Yang; Chuanbao Zhang; Wei Zhang; Yanwei Liu; Zhaoshi Bao; Xing Liu; Wenzhong Du; Hongjun Wang; Tao Jiang; Chuanlu Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-15

9.  IDH mutations: genotype-phenotype correlation and prognostic impact.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Wang; Pietro Ciccarino; Marta Rossetto; Blandine Boisselier; Yannick Marie; Virginie Desestret; Vincent Gleize; Karima Mokhtari; Marc Sanson; Marianne Labussière
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.246

10.  IDH mutation, 1p19q codeletion and ATRX loss in WHO grade II gliomas.

Authors:  Heather E Leeper; Alissa A Caron; Paul A Decker; Robert B Jenkins; Daniel H Lachance; Caterina Giannini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-06
View more
  14 in total

1.  Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Julia A Bridge; Peter Canoll; Howard Colman; Meera R Hameed; Brent T Harris; Eyas M Hattab; Jason T Huse; Robert B Jenkins; Dolores H Lopez-Terrada; William C McDonald; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lesley H Souter; Carol Colasacco; Nicole E Thomas; Michelle Hawks Yount; Martin J van den Bent; Arie Perry
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.686

2.  Analyzing the interactions of mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs to predict competing endogenous RNA networks in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yang Yuan; Li Jiaoming; Wang Xiang; Liu Yanhui; Jiang Shu; Gou Maling; Mao Qing
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Contribution of the Wnt Pathway to Defining Biology of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marton Tompa; Ferenc Kalovits; Adam Nagy; Bernadette Kalman
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 4.  Introduction to immunotherapy for brain tumor patients: challenges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Montoya; Noriyuki Kasahara; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-03-09

5.  Non-canonical IDH1 and IDH2 mutations: a clonal and relevant event in an Italian cohort of gliomas classified according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Authors:  Michela Visani; Giorgia Acquaviva; Gianluca Marucci; Alexandro Paccapelo; Antonella Mura; Enrico Franceschi; Daniela Grifoni; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini; Alba A Brandes; Dario de Biase
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Preoperative inflammation markers and IDH mutation status predict glioblastoma patient survival.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Wang; Hong-Wang Song; Hong-Qing Cai; Ling-Wei Kong; Kun Yao; Tao Jiang; Shou-Wei Li; Chang-Xiang Yan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 7.  An Insight into the Increasing Role of LncRNAs in the Pathogenesis of Gliomas.

Authors:  Yuanliang Yan; Zhijie Xu; Zhi Li; Lunquan Sun; Zhicheng Gong
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.639

8.  Mutation profiling of anaplastic ependymoma grade III by Ion Proton next generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ejaz Butt; Sabra Alyami; Tahani Nageeti; Muhammad Saeed; Khalid AlQuthami; Abdellatif Bouazzaoui; Mohammad Athar; Zainularifeen Abduljaleel; Faisal Al-Allaf; Mohiuddin Taher
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-02

9.  Radiomic prediction models for the level of Ki-67 and p53 in glioma.

Authors:  Xiaojun Sun; Peipei Pang; Lin Lou; Qi Feng; Zhongxiang Ding; Jian Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Detection of programmed death ligand 1 protein and CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration in plurihormonal pituitary adenomas: A case report and review of the literatures.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Tingjian Wang; Yakun Yang; Chunjiang Yu; Ning Liu; Changxiang Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.