Literature DB >> 27120254

Comparison of Learning Curves for Major and Minor Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Woohyung Lee1, Jung-Woo Woo1, Jin-Kwon Lee1, Ji-Ho Park1, Ju-Yeon Kim1, Seung-Jin Kwag1, Taejin Park1, Sang-Ho Jeong1, Young-Tae Ju1, Eun-Jung Jeong1, Young-Joon Lee1, Sang-Kyung Choi1, Soon-Chan Hong1, Chi-Young Jeong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has a steep learning curve, analyzing experience is important for trainees. Several authors have described the learning curve of LLR, without comparing the learning curves between major and minor LLR.
METHODS: Perioperative data were retrieved from the medical records of 170 consecutive patients who underwent LLR by a single surgeon at a tertiary hospital. Learning curves were generated and compared between major and minor LLR using cumulative sum control charts and the moving average.
RESULTS: Major and minor LLR was performed in 96 and 74 patients, respectively. The learning curves showed a steady state after case 50 for major LLR. Because of discordant results in minor LLR, subgroup analyses were performed, showing competency in LLR after cases 25 and 35 for left lateral sectionectomy and tumorectomy, respectively. Transfused red blood cell volume (0.6 versus 2.2 packs, P < .001) decreased after achievement of competence in major LLR. Blood loss exceeding 500 mL (odds ratio 2.395, 95% confidence interval 1.096-5.233, P = .028) was independently associated with LLR failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of cases required to accomplish LLR differed according to the extent of resection. Extensive blood loss was independently associated with LLR failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27120254     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  11 in total

1.  Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.

Authors:  Emin Kose; Bora Kahramangil; Husnu Aydin; Mustafa Donmez; Federico Aucejo; Cristiano Quintini; John Fung; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The learning curve in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: a cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kyung Chul Yoon; Jeong-Moo Lee; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Technical Aspects of Stapled Hepatectomy in Liver Surgery: How We Do It.

Authors:  Arianeb Mehrabi; Katrin Hoffmann; Alexander Johannes Nagel; Omid Ghamarnejad; Elias Khajeh; Mohammad Golriz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Stéphane Berdah; Olivier Farges; Laura Beyer Berjot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective.

Authors:  Carolijn L Nota; Inne H Borel Rinkes; Jeroen Hagendoorn
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Woohyung Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Jaewoo Kwon; Yejong Park; Seung Jae Lee; Guisuk Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Kuemmerli; Robert S Fichtinger; Alma Moekotte; Luca A Aldrighetti; Somaiah Aroori; Marc G H Besselink; Mathieu D'Hondt; Rafael Díaz-Nieto; Bjørn Edwin; Mikhail Efanov; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Krishna V Menon; Aali J Sheen; Zahir Soonawalla; Robert Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Steven A White; Lloyd Brandts; Gerard J P van Breukelen; Jasper Sijberden; Siân A Pugh; Zina Eminton; John N Primrose; Ronald van Dam; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Vinícius Campos Duarte; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Alain Valverde; Divia Danoussou; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Kevin Zuber; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Paulo Herman; Renato Micelli Lupinacci
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.