| Literature DB >> 27119372 |
Bogdan Timar1, Romulus Timar2, Laura Gaiță3, Cristian Oancea4, Codrina Levai5, Diana Lungeanu1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a prevalent complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with a major impact on the health of the affected patient. We hypothesized that mediated by the dysfunctionalities associated with DN's three major components: sensitive (lack of motion associated sensory), motor (impairments in movement coordination) and autonomic (the presence of postural hypotension), the presence of DN may impair the balance in the affected patients. Our study's main aim is to evaluate the possible association between the presence and severity of DN and both the balance impairment and the risk of falls in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27119372 PMCID: PMC4847853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient’s characteristics, stratified according to the presence of diabetic neuropathy.
| Without overt neuropathy | Overt neuropathy present | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male gender | 64 (45.4%) | 25 (43.9%) | 0.845 |
| Age (years) | 59 [12] | 64.5 [10.5] | 0.001 |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 7 [9] | 7 [9] | 0.867 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.0 ± 1.8 | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 0.620 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.9 ± 4.3 | 31.9 ± 3.9 | 0.030 |
| PHQ-9 score (points) | 7.2 ± 5.3 | 12.2 ± 7.9 | 0.011 |
| Smokers | 50 (35.5%) | 15 (26.3%) | 0.215 |
| Hypertensive patients | 117 (83.0%) | 45 (78.9%) | 0.505 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 20 (14.2%) | 32 (56.1%) | <0.001 |
| Retinopathy | 31 (22.0%) | 31 (54.4%) | <0.001 |
* Differences are statistically significant at α<0.05 threshold
.
.
.
HbA1c –Hemoglobin A1c
BMI—Body mass index
PHQ-9 –Patient’s health questionnaire-9
Balance parameters in patients with vs. without diabetic neuropathy.
| Without overt neuropathy | Overt neuropathy present | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBS (points) | 43.7 ± 5.0 | 40.5 ± 5.3 | <0.001 |
| TUG (s) | 7.6 [3.1] | 8.9 [3.0] | 0.002 |
| SLS (s) | 10.3 ± 2.0 | 9.3 ± 1.8 | 0.003 |
| FES—I (points) | 33 [14.0] | 38 [12] | 0.034 |
* Differences are statistically significant at α<0.05 threshold
.
.
BBS—Berg Balance Scale
TUG—Timed up and go
SLS—Single leg stand
FES-I—Falls Efficacy Scale—International
Fig 1The correlation between MNSI and BBS score.
MNSI—Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument; BBS—Berg Balance Scale.
Correlations between neuropathy’s severity and balance parameters.
| MSNI score (points) | p | |
|---|---|---|
| BBS (points) | -0.479 | <0.001 |
| TUG (s) | 0.122 | 0.088 |
| SLS (s) | -0.169 | 0.017 |
| FES—I (points) | 0.116 | 0.104 |
* Correlations are statistically significant at α<0.05 threshold
MNSI—Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument
BBS—Berg Balance Scale
TUG—Timed up and go
SLS—Single leg stand
FES-I—Falls Efficacy Scale—International
Balance parameters in patients with vs. without orthostatic hypotension.
| Orthostatic hypotension absent | Orthostatic hypotension present | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBS (points) | 42.8 ± 5.3 | 42.7 ± 5.4 | 0.902 |
| TUG (s) | 7.8 [2.9] | 8.7 [3.2] | 0.054 |
| SLS (s) | 10.2 ± 2.0 | 9.3 ± 1.9 | 0.028 |
| FES—I (points) | 32 [13] | 37 [16] | 0.048 |
* Differences are statistically significant at α<0.05 threshold
.
.
BBS—Berg Balance Scale
TUG—Timed up and go
SLS—Single leg stand
FES-I—Falls Efficacy Scale—International
Multivariate regression analysis results (dependent variable: BBS score).
| B | Exp (β) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MNSI score (points) | -1.208 | -0.622 | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | -0.051 | -0.100 | 0.021 |
| PHQ-9 (points) | -0.149 | -0.183 | 0.015 |