| Literature DB >> 27118761 |
Afif El-Khuffash1, Dany E Weisz2, Patrick J McNamara3.
Abstract
Despite a large body of scientific evidence on the management of premature infants with a patent ductus arteriosus controversy remains and neonatologists remain challenged for knowing which patient to treat, what is the most optimal timing of treatment and which treatments have a positive impact on both short-term and long-term outcomes. In this review article we discuss the increased body of evidence over the past 10 years, much of which questions the role of treatment and suggests the need to reconsider how haemodynamic significance is adjudicated. In addition, we discuss novel approaches to assessment and diagnosis, and highlight areas for future investigation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/Entities:
Keywords: hemodynamics; myocardial performance; patent ductus arteriosus; targeted neonatal echocardiography
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27118761 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ISSN: 1359-2998 Impact factor: 5.747