Literature DB >> 27118453

Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients.

Bruno Paiva1, Maria-Teresa Cedena2, Noemi Puig3, Paula Arana1, Maria-Belen Vidriales3, Lourdes Cordon4, Juan Flores-Montero5, Norma C Gutierrez3, María-Luisa Martín-Ramos2, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez2, Enrique M Ocio3, Miguel T Hernandez6, Ana-Isabel Teruel7, Laura Rosiñol8, María-Asunción Echeveste9, Rafael Martinez10, Mercedes Gironella11, Albert Oriol12, Carmen Cabrera13, Jesus Martin14, Joan Bargay15, Cristina Encinas16, Yolanda Gonzalez17, Jacques J M Van Dongen18, Alberto Orfao5, Joan Bladé8, Maria-Victoria Mateos3, Juan José Lahuerta2, Jesús F San Miguel1.   

Abstract

The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM) has been more frequently investigated in transplant-eligible patients than in elderly patients. Because an optimal balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity is of utmost importance in patients with elderly MM, sensitive MRD monitoring might be particularly valuable in this patient population. Here, we used second-generation 8-color multiparameter-flow cytometry (MFC) to monitor MRD in 162 transplant-ineligible MM patients enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2010MAS65 study. The transition from first- to second-generation MFC resulted in increased sensitivity and allowed us to identify 3 patient groups according to MRD levels: MRD negative (<10(-5); n = 54, 34%), MRD positive (between <10(-4) and ≥10(-5); n = 20, 12%), and MRD positive (≥10(-4); n = 88, 54%). MRD status was an independent prognostic factor for time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; P = .007) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 3.1; P = .04), with significant benefit for MRD-negative patients (median TTP not reached, 70% OS at 3 years), and similar poorer outcomes for cases with MRD levels between <10(-4) and ≥10(-5) vs ≥10(-4) (both with a median TTP of 15 months; 63% and 55% OS at 3 years, respectively). Furthermore, MRD negativity significantly improved TTP of patients >75 years (HR, 4.8; P < .001), as well as those with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 12.6; P = .01). Using second-generation MFC, immune profiling concomitant to MRD monitoring also contributed to identify patients with poor, intermediate, and favorable outcomes (25%, 61%, and 100% OS at 3 years, respectively; P = .01), the later patients being characterized by an increased compartment of mature B cells. Our results show that similarly to transplant candidates, MRD monitoring is one of the most relevant prognostic factors in elderly MM patients, irrespectively of age or cytogenetic risk. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01237249.
© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118453     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-705319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  47 in total

Review 1.  Approach to the treatment of the older, unfit patient with myeloma from diagnosis to relapse: perspectives of a US hematologist and a geriatric hematologist.

Authors:  Tanya M Wildes; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  Current Review on High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Henry S H Chan; Christine I Chen; Donna E Reece
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Impact of minimal residual negativity using next generation flow cytometry on outcomes in light chain amyloidosis.

Authors:  Surbhi Sidana; Eli Muchtar; M Hasib Sidiqi; Dragan Jevremovic; Angela Dispenzieri; Wilson Gonsalves; Francis Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Prashant Kapoor; Ronald S Go; Rahma Warsame; Nelson Leung; S Vincent Rajkumar; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Multiple myeloma patients in long-term complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation express a particular immune signature with potential prognostic implication.

Authors:  A Arteche-López; A Kreutzman; A Alegre; P Sanz Martín; B Aguado; M González-Pardo; M Espiño; L M Villar; D García Belmonte; R de la Cámara; C Muñoz-Calleja
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  Clinical value of measurable residual disease testing for multiple myeloma and implementation in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takamatsu
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Does Not Overcome Poor Prognosis in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chutima Kunacheewa; Hans C Lee; Krina Patel; Sheeba Thomas; Behrang Amini; Samer Srour; Qaiser Bashir; Yago Nieto; Muzzaffar H Qazilbash; Donna M Weber; Lei Feng; Robert Z Orlowski; Pei Lin; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 8.  Is molecular remission the goal of multiple myeloma therapy?

Authors:  Faith E Davies
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 9.  Comprehensive characterization of circulating and bone marrow-derived multiple myeloma cells at minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Johannes M Waldschmidt; Praveen Anand; Birgit Knoechel; Jens G Lohr
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 10.  Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More.

Authors:  Ashley Rosko; Sergio Giralt; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.