Literature DB >> 27117670

Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: Analysis of progress test results.

Dario Cecilio-Fernandes1, Wouter Kerdijk2, A D Debbie C Jaarsma1, René A Tio1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students' cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.
METHODS: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom's taxonomy: "simple questions" requiring lower and "vignette questions" requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students' performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.
RESULTS: Students' performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students' judgment of knowledge decreased over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students' cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27117670     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary Science as a Method to Facilitate Higher Level Thinking and Reasoning in Medical Training.

Authors:  Joseph L Graves; Chris Reiber; Anna Thanukos; Magdalena Hurtado; Terry Wolpaw
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10-15

2.  Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis.

Authors:  Dario Cecilio-Fernandes; Harro Medema; Carlos Fernando Collares; Lambert Schuwirth; Janke Cohen-Schotanus; René A Tio
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  The Impact of Curriculum Design in the Acquisition of Knowledge of Oncology: Comparison Among Four Medical Schools.

Authors:  Dario Cecilio-Fernandes; Wytze S Aalders; André J A Bremers; René A Tio; Jakob de Vries
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The Impact of Massed and Spaced-Out Curriculum in Oncology Knowledge Acquisition.

Authors:  Dario Cecilio-Fernandes; Wytze S Aalders; Jakob de Vries; René A Tio
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Practical points for brain-friendly medical and health sciences teaching.

Authors:  Sahar Ghanbari; Fariba Haghani; Malahat Akbarfahimi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2019-10-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.