Literature DB >> 27114605

Response to Cetuximab With or Without Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring the KRAS G13D Mutation: Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group ICECREAM Study.

Eva Segelov1, Subotheni Thavaneswaran2, Paul M Waring2, Jayesh Desai2, Kristy P Robledo2, Val J Gebski2, Elena Elez2, Louise M Nott2, Christos S Karapetis2, Sebastian Lunke2, Lorraine A Chantrill2, Nick Pavlakis2, Mustafa Khasraw2, Craig Underhill2, Fortunato Ciardiello2, Michael Jefford2, Harpreet Wasan2, Andrew Haydon2, Timothy J Price2, Guy van Hazel2, Kate Wilson2, John Simes2, Jeremy D Shapiro2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: RAS mutations predict lack of response to epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but preclinical studies and retrospective clinical data suggest that patients with tumors harboring the exon 2 KRAS G13D mutation may benefit from cetuximab. We aimed to assess cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with molecularly selected (G13D mutation) chemotherapy-refractory mCRC in a randomized phase II trial of this rare molecular subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS G13D mutation-positive mCRC who had progressed within 6 months of irinotecan therapy were randomly assigned to cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and then 250 mg/m(2) once per week with or without irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival; secondary end points were response rate, overall survival, quality of life, and toxicity.
RESULTS: Fifty-one of 53 patients recruited over 2 years were eligible. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 10% (95% CI, 2% to 26%) for cetuximab versus 23% (95% CI, 9% to 40%) for cetuximab plus irinotecan with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.32). Response and stable disease rates were 0% and 58% for monotherapy versus 9% and 70% for combination treatment, respectively. Overall survival and quality of life were similar; toxicities were higher with combination therapy.
CONCLUSION: In patients with G13D-mutated chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, there was no statistically significant improvement in disease control at 6 months with either cetuximab monotherapy or cetuximab plus irinotecan. No responses were seen with single-agent cetuximab. The responses observed with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan may reflect true drug synergy or persistent irinotecan sensitivity. The ICECREAM (Irinotecan Cetuximab Evaluation and Cetuximab Response Evaluation Among Patients with a G13D Mutation) study demonstrates the need to prospectively evaluate hypotheses that were previously supported by retrospective analyses and exemplifies the value of international collaboration in trials of rare molecular subtypes.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114605     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.6843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

1.  Therapeutic Response of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring a KRAS Missense Mutation After Combination Chemotherapy With the EGFR Inhibitor Panitumumab.

Authors:  Emil Lou; Donna D'Souza; Andrew C Nelson
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  KRAS G13D sensitivity to neurofibromin-mediated GTP hydrolysis.

Authors:  Dana Rabara; Timothy H Tran; Srisathiyanarayanan Dharmaiah; Robert M Stephens; Frank McCormick; Dhirendra K Simanshu; Matthew Holderfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A systems mechanism for KRAS mutant allele-specific responses to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Thomas McFall; Jolene K Diedrich; Meron Mengistu; Stacy L Littlechild; Kendra V Paskvan; Laura Sisk-Hackworth; James J Moresco; Andrey S Shaw; Edward C Stites
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 4.  Primary and acquired resistance to biologic therapies in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Sam J Lubner; Nataliya V Uboha; Dustin A Deming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  The biological complexity of colorectal cancer: insights into biomarkers for early detection and personalized care.

Authors:  Marina De Rosa; Daniela Rega; Valeria Costabile; Francesca Duraturo; Antonello Niglio; Paola Izzo; Ugo Pace; Paolo Delrio
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 6.  Precision oncology in metastatic colorectal cancer - from biology to medicine.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Pietro Paolo Vitiello; Silvia Marsoni; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Livio Trusolino; Rene Bernards; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Mechanisms of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sforza; Erika Martinelli; Fortunato Ciardiello; Valentina Gambardella; Stefania Napolitano; Giulia Martini; Carminia Della Corte; Claudia Cardone; Marianna L Ferrara; Alfonso Reginelli; Giuseppina Liguori; Giulio Belli; Teresa Troiani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  RAS, wanted dead or alive: Advances in targeting RAS mutant cancers.

Authors:  Clint A Stalnecker; Channing J Der
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  Clinical and Functional Characterization of Atypical KRAS/NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Yucai Wang; Muddassir A Syed; Alexey V Sorokin; Oluwadara Coker; Joanne Xiu; Benjamin A Weinberg; Ari M Vanderwalde; Anteneh Tesfaye; Victoria M Raymond; Benjamin Miron; Gabi Tarcic; Ori Zelichov; Russell R Broaddus; Patrick Kwok Shing Ng; Kang Jin Jeong; Yiu Huen Tsang; Gordon B Mills; Michael J Overman; Axel Grothey; John L Marshall; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Mathematical Modeling to Study KRAS Mutant-Specific Responses to Pathway Inhibition.

Authors:  Edward C Stites
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.