Literature DB >> 27114553

Potential follow-up increases private contributions to public goods.

Todd Rogers1, John Ternovski2, Erez Yoeli3.   

Abstract

People contribute more to public goods when their contributions are made more observable to others. We report an intervention that subtly increases the observability of public goods contributions when people are solicited privately and impersonally (e.g., mail, email, social media). This intervention is tested in a large-scale field experiment (n = 770,946) in which people are encouraged to vote through get-out-the-vote letters. We vary whether the letters include the message, "We may call you after the election to ask about your voting experience." Increasing the perceived observability of whether people vote by including that message increased the impact of the get-out-the-vote letters by more than the entire effect of a typical get-out-the-vote letter. This technique for increasing perceived observability can be replicated whenever public goods solicitations are made in private.

Entities:  

Keywords:  field experiment; get-out-the-vote; observability; public goods; reputation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114553      PMCID: PMC4868414          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524899113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Do you have a voting plan?: implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making.

Authors:  David W Nickerson; Todd Rogers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-08

Review 2.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.

Authors:  Christopher J Bryan; Gregory M Walton; Todd Rogers; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reputation can enhance or suppress cooperation through positive feedback.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Polly Doodson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Alexander Peysakhovich; Gordon T Kraft-Todd; George E Newman; Owen Wurzbacher; Martin A Nowak; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.

Authors:  Robert M Bond; Christopher J Fariss; Jason J Jones; Adam D I Kramer; Cameron Marlow; Jaime E Settle; James H Fowler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment.

Authors:  Erez Yoeli; Moshe Hoffman; David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Adam Bear; David G Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Shame and honour drive cooperation.

Authors:  Jennifer Jacquet; Christoph Hauert; Arne Traulsen; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  2 in total

1.  Think global, act local: Preserving the global commons.

Authors:  Oliver P Hauser; Achim Hendriks; David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Accountability: a missing construct in models of adherence behavior and in clinical practice.

Authors:  Elias Oussedik; Capri G Foy; E J Masicampo; Lara K Kammrath; Robert E Anderson; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.