Literature DB >> 27114373

Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.

Simon King1, Margaret Dimech2, Susan Johnstone3.   

Abstract

We examined whether introduction of a structured macroscopic reporting template for rectal tumour resection specimens improved the completeness and efficiency in collecting key macroscopic data elements. Fifty free text (narrative) macroscopic reports retrieved from 2012 to 2014 were compared with 50 structured macroscopic reports from 2013 to 2015, all of which were generated at John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW. The six standard macroscopic data elements examined in this study were reported in all 50 anatomical pathology reports using a structured macroscopic reporting dictation template. Free text reports demonstrated significantly impaired data collection when recording intactness of mesorectum (p<0.001), relationship to anterior peritoneal reflection (p=0.028) and distance of tumour to the non-peritonealised circumferential margin (p<0.001). The number of words used was also significantly (p<0.001) reduced using pre-formatted structured reports compared to free text reports. The introduction of a structured reporting dictation template improves data collection and may reduce the subsequent administrative burden when macroscopically evaluating rectal resections.
Copyright © 2016 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RCPA Macroscopic Cut-up Manual; Rectal cancer; dictation template; key data elements; macroscopic description; rectal resection; structured macroscopic report; synoptic report

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114373     DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  5 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection in rectal cancer].

Authors:  H-R Raab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  New Operative Reporting Standards: Where We Stand Now and Opportunities for Innovation.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Soegaard Ballester; Kristin E Goodsell; Jae P Ermer; Giorgos C Karakousis; John T Miura; Nicole M Saur; Najjia N Mahmoud; Ari Brooks; Julia C Tchou; Peter E Gabriel; Lawrence N Shulman; Heather Wachtel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Intraepithelial lymphocytes, scores, mimickers and challenges in diagnosing gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease).

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Fan Shen; Gerd Bouma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Assessing the Quality of Rectal Cancer Pathology Reports in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-04/NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Shonan Sho; Greg Yothers; Linda H Colangelo; Patricia A Ganz; Michael J O'Connell; Robert W Beart; Marian Hemmelgarn; Formosa C Chen; Clifford Y Ko; Marcia M Russell
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.412

5.  Standardised reports with a template format are superior to free text reports: the case for rectal cancer reporting in clinical practice.

Authors:  P J Brown; H Rossington; J Taylor; D M J Lambregts; E Morris; N P West; P Quirke; D Tolan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.