Literature DB >> 27114370

Diagnostic performance of a commercial immunoblot assay for myositis antibody testing.

Chris Bundell1, Arada Rojana-Udomsart2, Frank Mastaglia3, Peter Hollingsworth1, Andrew McLean-Tooke4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish a population based reference range for a commercial immunoblot assay detecting myositis specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis associated autoantibodies (MAAs), and to assess the diagnostic performance of this reference range against the manufacturer's recommended ranges in a myositis patient cohort. A total of 124 patients from a myositis cohort and 197 healthy controls were serologically assessed using a commercial immunoblot containing eleven autoantigens (Jo-1, EJ, OJ, PL7, PL12, Mi-2, SRP, Ku, PMScl75, PMScl100 and Ro52) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Use of the manufacturer's reference ranges resulted in detection of MSAs in 19.4% of myositis patients and 9.1% of controls; MAAs were detected in 41.1% of myositis patients and 14.2% of controls. Reference values derived from the healthy control population resulted in significant differences in cut-off values for some autoantibodies, particularly Ro52 and PMScl75. Use of local reference ranges reduced detection of MSAs to 16.9% of myositis patients and 3% of healthy controls, with MAAs 23.4% of patients and 2% of healthy controls. Application of population based reference ranges resulted in significant differences in detection of MSAs and MAAs compared to the manufacturer's recommended ranges. Cut-off levels should be assessed to ensure suitability for the population tested.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoantibodies; dermatomyositis; diagnosis; immunoblot; myositis; polymyositis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114370     DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  11 in total

1.  [Correlation study on anti-Ro52 antibodies frequently co-occur with other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies].

Authors:  Y M Zheng; H J Hao; Y L Liu; J Guo; Y W Zhao; W Zhang; Y Yuan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 2.  Autoantibodies in myositis.

Authors:  Neil J McHugh; Sarah L Tansley
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Autoantibodies in juvenile-onset myositis: Their diagnostic value and associated clinical phenotype in a large UK cohort.

Authors:  Sarah L Tansley; Stefania Simou; Gavin Shaddick; Zoe E Betteridge; Beverley Almeida; Harsha Gunawardena; Wendy Thomson; Michael W Beresford; Angela Midgley; Francesco Muntoni; Lucy R Wedderburn; Neil J McHugh
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 7.094

4.  The reliability of immunoassays to detect autoantibodies in patients with myositis is dependent on autoantibody specificity.

Authors:  Sarah L Tansley; Danyang Li; Zoe E Betteridge; Neil J McHugh
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  A comprehensive clinical and laboratory evaluation of 224 patients with persistent symptoms attributed to presumed tick-bite exposure.

Authors:  Kenneth Nilsson; Elisabet Skoog; Viktor Jones; Lisa Labbé Sandelin; Christina Björling; Ester Fridenström; Marie Edvinsson; Andreas Mårtensson; Björn Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Dermatomyositis autoantibodies: how can we maximize utility?

Authors:  Luqman Mushila Hodgkinson; Tiffany Tingshuen Wu; David Franklin Fiorentino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

7.  Positioning of myositis-specific and associated autoantibody (MSA/MAA) testing in disease criteria and routine diagnostic work-up.

Authors:  Carolien Bonroy; Yves Piette; Yves Allenbach; Xavier Bossuyt; Jan Damoiseaux
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Identification of a unique anti-Ro60 subset with restricted serological and molecular profiles.

Authors:  A Y S Lee; D Beroukas; L Brown; C Lucchesi; A Kaur; L Gyedu; N Hughes; Y H Ng; O Saran; T P Gordon; J J Wang
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The promise, perceptions, and pitfalls of immunoassays for autoantibody testing in myositis.

Authors:  Sarah L Tansley; Julia Snowball; John D Pauling; Anya Lissina; Masataka Kuwana; Lisa G Rider; Johan Rönnelid; Neil J McHugh
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Anti-TIF-1γ Antibody Detection Using a Commercial Kit vs In-House Immunoblot: Usefulness in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anaís Mariscal; Milena Milán; Andrés Baucells; Maria Angeles Martínez; Andrea Garcia Guillen; Ernesto Trallero-Araguás; Marcelo Alvarado-Cardenas; Laura Martínez-Martínez; Leticia Alserawan; Teresa Franco-Leyva; María Teresa Sanz-Martínez; Laura Viñas-Giménez; Hector Corominas; Cándido Juárez; Iván Castellví; Albert Selva-O'Callaghan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.