Literature DB >> 32852779

Identification of a unique anti-Ro60 subset with restricted serological and molecular profiles.

A Y S Lee1,2, D Beroukas1,2, L Brown1, C Lucchesi1, A Kaur1, L Gyedu1, N Hughes1, Y H Ng1, O Saran1, T P Gordon1,2, J J Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Anti-Ro60 is one of the most common and clinically important serum autoantibodies that has a number of diagnostic and predictive capabilities. Most diagnostic laboratories report this simply as a qualitative positive/negative result. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical and serological relevance of a novel subset of anti-Ro60 in patients who display low levels of anti-Ro60 (anti-Ro60low ). We retrospectively identified anti-Ro60 sera during a 12-month period at a major immunopathology diagnostic laboratory in Australia. These all were anti-Ro60-precipitin-positive on the diagnostic gold standard counter-immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP). Lineblot immunoassay was used to stratify patients into either anti-Ro60low or anti-Ro60high subsets. We compared the medical and laboratory parameters associated with each group. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and mass spectrometry techniques were used to analyse the serological and molecular basis behind the two subsets. Anti-Ro60low patients displayed less serological activity than anti-Ro60high patients with less intermolecular spreading, hypergammaglobulinaemia and less tendency to undergo anti-Ro60 isotype-switching than anti-Ro60high patients. Mass spectrometric typing of the anti-Ro60low subset showed restricted variable heavy chain subfamily usage and amino acid point mutations. This subset also displayed clinical relevance, being present in a number of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). We identify a novel anti-Ro60low patient subset that is distinct from anti-Ro60high patients serologically and molecularly. It is not clear whether they arise from common or separate origins; however, they probably have different developmental pathways to account for the stark difference in immunological maturity. We hence demonstrate significance to anti-Ro60low and justify accurate detection in the diagnostic laboratory.
© 2020 British Society for Immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-Ro60; antibodies; autoantibodies; diagnostics; laboratory medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32852779      PMCID: PMC7744494          DOI: 10.1111/cei.13508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  35 in total

Review 1.  Extrafollicular antibody responses.

Authors:  Ian C M MacLennan; Kai-Michael Toellner; Adam F Cunningham; Karine Serre; Daniel M-Y Sze; Elina Zúñiga; Matthew C Cook; Carola G Vinuesa
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 2.  Germinal-center organization and cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher D C Allen; Takaharu Okada; Jason G Cyster
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  T cell-independent and toll-like receptor-dependent antigen-driven activation of autoreactive B cells.

Authors:  Robin A Herlands; Sean R Christensen; Rebecca A Sweet; Uri Hershberg; Mark J Shlomchik
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.

Authors:  Nancy Agmon-Levin; Jan Damoiseaux; Cees Kallenberg; Ulrich Sack; Torsten Witte; Manfred Herold; Xavier Bossuyt; Lucille Musset; Ricard Cervera; Aresio Plaza-Lopez; Carlos Dias; Maria José Sousa; Antonella Radice; Catharina Eriksson; Olof Hultgren; Markku Viander; Munther Khamashta; Stephan Regenass; Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade; Allan Wiik; Angela Tincani; Johan Rönnelid; Donald B Bloch; Marvin J Fritzler; Edward K L Chan; I Garcia-De La Torre; Konstantin N Konstantinov; Robert Lahita; Merlin Wilson; Olli Vainio; Nicole Fabien; Renato Alberto Sinico; Pierluigi Meroni; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Autoantibodies present before symptom onset in primary Sjögren syndrome.

Authors:  Roland Jonsson; Elke Theander; Bitte Sjöström; Karl Brokstad; Gunnel Henriksson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Utility of the HEp-2000 antinuclear antibody substrate.

Authors:  Adrian Y S Lee; Dimitra Beroukas; Peter J Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Within germinal centers, isotype switching of immunoglobulin genes occurs after the onset of somatic mutation.

Authors:  Y J Liu; F Malisan; O de Bouteiller; C Guret; S Lebecque; J Banchereau; F C Mills; E E Max; H Martinez-Valdez
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  The predictive value of anti-SS-A antibodies titration in pregnant women with fetal congenital heart block.

Authors:  Ai Anami; Kotaro Fukushima; Yoshinari Takasaki; Takayuki Sumida; Masako Waguri; Norio Wake; Atsuko Murashima
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.023

9.  Utility of cardiac monitoring in fetuses at risk for congenital heart block: the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) prospective study.

Authors:  Deborah M Friedman; Mimi Y Kim; Joshua A Copel; Claudine Davis; Colin K L Phoon; Julie S Glickstein; Jill P Buyon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Autoantibody response to the Ro/La particle may predict outcome in neonatal lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  E D Silverman; J Buyon; R M Laxer; R Hamilton; P Bini; J L Chu; K B Elkon
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antibodies to Both Ro52 and Ro60 for Identifying Sjögren's Syndrome Patients Best Suited for Clinical Trials of Disease-Modifying Therapies.

Authors:  Berkan Armağan; Susan A Robinson; Adriana Bazoberry; Jamie Perin; Thomas Grader-Beck; Esen K Akpek; Jean Kim; Alan N Baer
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.178

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.