Literature DB >> 27113537

Strain mapping in the Achilles tendon - A systematic review.

Stijn Bogaerts1, Hannelore Desmet2, Pieter Slagmolen3, Koen Peers4.   

Abstract

Achilles tendinopathy remains one of the most prevalent overuse injuries in elite as well as recreational athletes. Regardless of the fact that the aetiology of tendinopathy has not been fully understood, therapeutic mechanical loading programs have emerged as being the treatment of choice. In this light, mechanical properties of the tendon and their response to changes in loading or unloading have been the subject of many previous investigations. One of these properties often investigated is strain, a measure of relative deformation. By means of a systematic review, an overview was given of research in this field, with a primary objective to list the methods used and secondary aim to synthesize data on strain mapping in the Achilles tendon. Following the guidelines of the PRISMA statement, 47 articles were found appropriate for qualitative assessment. Achilles tendon strain has been investigated across a variety of contexts, including the response to exercise, walking, unloading, ageing, hormonal changes and weight. Only three studies investigated the effect of the presence of tendinopathy on strain. Ultrasound was the most often used imaging modality to measure or estimate strain. Further methodological parameters, e.g. the location of measurement, differed greatly between all different studies. Nearly all studies considered global strain. Some studies investigated the transverse strain response of the Achilles tendon. Recently, however, the role of local - intratendinous - strain distribution has been found to be of critical importance and further studies should focus on imaging modalities to investigate these local changes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles; Review; Strain; Tendon; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27113537     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  The challenges of measuring in vivo knee collateral ligament strains using ultrasound.

Authors:  Laura C Slane; Josh A Slane; Jan D'hooge; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Strain imaging of the lateral collateral ligament using high frequency and conventional ultrasound imaging: An ex-vivo comparison.

Authors:  Kaj Gijsbertse; André Sprengers; Hamid Naghibi Beidokhti; Maartje Nillesen; Chris de Korte; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Foundational Principles and Adaptation of the Healthy and Pathological Achilles Tendon in Response to Resistance Exercise: A Narrative Review and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Kohle Merry; Christopher Napier; Charlie M Waugh; Alex Scott
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Active-Sensing Epidermal Stretchable Bioelectronic Patch for Noninvasive, Conformal, and Wireless Tendon Monitoring.

Authors:  Sheng Shu; Jie An; Pengfei Chen; Di Liu; Ziming Wang; Chengyu Li; Shuangzhe Zhang; Yuan Liu; Jianzhe Luo; Lulu Zu; Wei Tang; Zhong Lin Wang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Treatment of partial injury of the calcaneus tendon with heterologous fibrin biopolymer and/or photobiomodulation in rats.

Authors:  Enéas de Freitas Dutra Júnior; Sílvia Maria Cardoso Magalhães Hidd; Marcello Magri Amaral; Antonio Luiz Martins Maia Filho; Livia Assis; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Benedito Barraviera; Cintia Cristina Santi Martignago; José Figueredo-Silva; Rauirys Alencar de Oliveira; Carla Roberta Tim
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Evaluation of tissue displacement and regional strain in the Achilles tendon using quantitative high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Stijn Bogaerts; Catarina De Brito Carvalho; Lennart Scheys; Kaat Desloovere; Jan D'hooge; Frederik Maes; Paul Suetens; Koen Peers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.